Oct

3

“Barnard Speaks Out” In A Dull Roar

Written by

A two-way street as communication

Bwog’s Barnard Bureau Chief Renée Kraiem visited the Diana Center Event Oval last night. There, Barnard students and administrators gathered over falafel and hummus to cultivate better collaboration between students and administrators.

The evening began with an administrative panel on the issue that included Annie Aversa, Dean for Campus and Residential Life, Avis Hinkson, Dean of the College, and Joyce Lewandowski from Student Life, Director of Orientation and Activities, all monitored by Abigail Lewis, the Associate Director of the Athena Center.  Lewis presented three key aspects of communication for panelists to address: communication, role modeling, and transparency. “Complete transparency isn’t always appropriate, or desired,” said Lewis, but urged the panel and its audience to address what area of policy could realistically be more transparent.

Dean Hinkson, for her part, insisted that communication is a “two-way street,” and categorized the issue as “how to cultivate responses, pause, and really listen to those responses.”  Hinkson highlighted the difficulty she and other administrators have experienced in trying to cultivate responses, citing the meager ten responses she received to her email regarding housing this week. “Obviously it’s an issue of trust,” said Hinkson. “The degree to which you believe that I am being truthful will guide your opinions and your responses and what you choose to share as well…but I hope that as we enter into dialogue we are always coming with our best foot forward.”

Lewandowski and Aversa echoed AHinks’s comments, stressing that, on the housing front, “a simple question is never really a simple question,” and their respective struggles to solicit feedback from a wide range of students. “I look through comments on campus media,” said Lewandowski, and “those are the things I always keep in mind when I’m making changes to the schedule. So keep writing those op-eds, keep posting stuff on campus media because we do read it…and for me personally, I do take it very seriously.”

The evening concluded with discussions between administrators and student attendees at individual tables that included a breadth of recent policy changes on campus, including the ongoing negotiations between the college and Local 2110 UAW workers, the fall housing crisis, and the recent decrease in free counseling sessions at Furman, to name a few. All tables carried on excited discussions through the meeting’s scheduled ending at 8 pm, and for the next half hour almost all administrators remained in the Event Oval speaking with even smaller groups of students. The productivity of this notwithstanding, the issue still stands that, in the words of Aversa, “if we’re so reliant on student feedback…and we get [such] a small proportion of responses…how can we get a larger group of students…how can we communicate that to students? Apparently, Barnard is going to need more than falafel.

Metaphor via Wikimedia Commons

Tags: , , , , ,

7 Comments

  1. Ugh.

    “The degree to which you believe that I am being truthful will guide your opinions and your responses and what you choose to share as well…but I hope that as we enter into dialogue we are always coming with our best foot forward.”

    But the point is that we don't believe that you're being truthful or that you care to listen. Otherwise, why would changes to longstanding policy, or permitted practice or whatever the administration cares to call things they've promised people, have been announced without previous space for dialogue? It seems quite clear that after all of the meal plan trouble students gave Barnard, after all of the conversations with the administration that did result in concrete change, that the Deans or the Board (or whomever we're blaming is) decided that it would probably be best not to make things like this public until after the decision is already made. This way complaints don't really have to be taken into consideration, they can just be heard and promptly ignored. Communication can't be a two-way street after a decision has ALREADY BEEN MADE.

  2. Anonymous  

    yep, three times (twice illegally with part-time and returning student housing contract denial)

  3. Anonymous

    There will never be cooperation as long as the administrators remain accountable to no one. These masterminds have no incentive to listen to plebes like us. I say if they want to prove they are willing to listen to students, why not make their employment contingent on a vote by the students? Bureaucrats at Barnard, and more broadly Columbia, are out of control. Who made these people God?

  4. Anonymous

    Barnard is in trouble. That much is clear.

© 2006-2015 Blue and White Publishing Inc.