Oct

17

Junior Class Councils Hold University Unity Forum at Barnard, Barnard Attends

Written by

Puppies bring unity too…

Monday night saw the anticipated coming-together of Columbia University under the roof of the Diana Center. As with most other things that happen under the hallowed roof of the Diana Center, Renée Kraiem was there.

Monday’s University Unity Forum was hosted by the Junior Class Councils of Barnard, CC, and SEAS (GS lacks an equivalent as there is technically no “Junior class”). The evening began with an introduction by the organizers, CCSC ’14 President Conan Cassidy; CCSC ’14 VP Joanna Kelly; Barnard’s 2014 president and vice president Aliza Hassine and Colleen Mulvihill, respectively; and SEAS ’14 President Daniel O’Leary. The speakers thanked the 40ish in attendance and reminded participants: “whatever you say here, it has implications one way or another.”

The group then split up into smaller tables to discuss the relationship between the four undergraduate schools at Columbia through questions moderated by class council representatives.  Discussions varied, clearly, based on the participants at each table, but a few things were consistent throughout—the majority of the participants were Barnard students, those who weren’t Barnard students were pretty psyched to be at Barnard, and what we were really talking about here was Barnard.

“The goal of this event,” Hassine said, “was that we felt like there wasn’t any discussion in May regarding what happened on a university-wide stage.” As individuals addressed questions at their tables, such as whether they identified with their respective college or the university at large, or whether they had ever experienced any form of discrimination based on the college that they went to, discussion abounded. The discussions tended to have a common theme, which was that the distinction between Barnard and the schools to the east of Broadway was substantially larger than that between those eastern-side schools. It was generally agreed that this had led to problems. Surprise, surprise. But, like Hassine said, this sentiment had implications, and those implications are interesting.

Once the entire (30ish, now) group of participants reconvened, a discussion about the very room that held the forum led to a consensus about promoting awareness. Numerous comments comprised the usual suggestions, like the dorm sign-in policy, email addresses, and programming locations. The most productive conclusion, however, came from the general sentiment that what had to change was the dispersal and internalization of information about the relationship between individual schools and the whole. “Until the administration takes the stance and they say what the relationship is…I think the change in campus culture should start there,” Cassidy said. Or, suggested a few other participants, “the change starts with us.”

That change may start with those (20ish, at this point) at the forum, but at the end of the evening, the question was really about with whom those at the Forum should be connecting, and how. Breaking the chain of stereotypes that perpetuate themselves through incoming classes—be it through student culture and admissions material—is a must, participants stressed.  For the whole, united University’s sake, though, here’s hoping that the “we” who are starting the change are a tad more than the 20 who stuck out the whole evening—even if midterm week month accounts for another ten who meant to come before falling asleep in 209.

Balls o’ fluff via Shutterstock

Tags: , , , ,

6 Comments

  1. Anon  

    Colleen Mulvihill is the BC '14 Class Vice President not secretary

  2. But  

    Columbia really does only have 3 undergraduate schools. Columbia and Barnard didn't do a merger, so it's weird to talk about Barnard as something that belongs to Columbia. Barnard isn't Columbia's bitch. We're talking about one congregation of undergraduates, not one institution of undergraduates, and acknowledging that doesn't have to be divisive.

    • Anonymous  

      so, what exactly is barnard? where does that leave barnard? and what implications do these answers have in terms of how we (the three Columbia undergrad schools) interact with barnard?

      • OP  

        Barnard is a nearby institution. Barnard doesn't have to be "left" anywhere. The strength of our community is reason enough to have undergraduate councils meet regardless of institution, and that the councils do meet cross-institutionally is a great way of accounting for Barnard's importance in the neighborhood population of undergraduates. That is, the students all interact anyway and it would be stupid to make each campus have its own chapter of a student organization, so we might as well have that manifest in certain administrative functions even if the students don't all go to the exact same school.

  3. Didn't read post,  

    Just really want that puppy !

  4. N.B.

    'Barnard is both an independently incorporated educational institution and an official college of Columbia University—a position that simultaneously affords it self-determination and a rich, value-enhancing partnership.'

    source: http://barnard.edu/catalogue/college

    Does this resolve the issue?

© 2006-2015 Blue and White Publishing Inc.