Sep

29

LectureHop: The KKK And Separation Of Church And State

Written by

Some good old political cartoonage

Some good old political cartoonage

Non-KKK-supporter Elizabeth Self attended this week’s lecture on the KKK. Let her educate you. 

Yesterday, Philip Hamburger, professor of law, gave a talk on the KKK and the Separation of Church and State. I dropped in, intrigued because I’ve always been confused about just what the KKK was. In textbooks I was told they were a weirdly well-organized lynch mob of the South, but my older, male, white relatives back in Alabama always vehemently insisted that this misunderstood little club was actually designed to protect women and force men to be genteel and bring home the bacon and was simply vilified by the Yankee media, which chose to focus on there oh-so-few not-so-pleasant activities. Though I was more inclined to believe the book, I thought I would go be sure.

Now I’m even more confused.

In order to accurately describe the Klan’s role in the politics of the 20th century, Hamburger organized his talk as “a table of strange facts,” with such servings as the roles of women’s groups, the meaning of the fiery cross, the goals of the KKK for public education, different meanings of the slogan “Separation of Church and State”, and the role of the clan in nativist movements today. As he dished out all of these odd servings, I learned that the Klan presented itself as a rather progressive group, pledging to dispel ignorance and encourage liberated minds, as well as, you know, defend white supremacy. Many of us would even agree with their stance on public education, too: “Children should be taught how to think, not what to think.”

I was even shocked to hear from Professor Hamburger (if you’re beginning to get hungry, maybe I should also mention that salad, pita bread, and fudge were also served) that the KKK was so popular up north that there was a women’s KKK group in every major city of New York State. Meanwhile, in the South the wealthy considered the whole organization to be brutish and even disgusting and wouldn’t have anything at all to do with it.

After about a half hour of his lecture, Hamburger opened the floor to discussion, during which I learned that I was probably the only person without a degree and/or career in political science or history there. Even though much of the historical, theoretical jargon was over my head, it was enlightening to hear about how many ways the idea of separation and state had been interpreted and applied. Hamburger also got pretty darn metaphysical, comparing racism to public bathrooms, fleshing out the dangers of phrases, and declaring, “History is more than just the past.”

The takeaway: Southerners were in fact not the only ones who bought into the Klan, the Klan like to spell things with lots of K’s, not everyone who has a nice slogan is actually nice, and go to lectures because odd things happen and there’s sometimes free food. Look out for the next talk in this series, “The Politics of Irreligion: The Political Causes of America’s Growing Secularism” by David Campbell on October 17th.

Questionable art via Wikimedia

Tags: , , , ,

3 Comments

  1. procrastinator  

    this sounds so interesting. i really need to take advantage of these lectures

  2. Tom Metzger

    To understand the Klan you must research the differant phases of the Klan.
    1. The phase of unconventional wafare against northern un constitutional occupation.
    2. The 20's was a lot differant. Copying the Masons, mostly political activity.The Klan was far stronger in the north and west. For business contacts it was similar to the other lodges.The Southern Klan was more right wing tending to support the establishment business community. In the midwest the Klan supported some socialists for office and were more populist.
    3. 40's onward. Unable to get complete race separation because of the southern financial ruling class. As under the Capitalist plantation system poor whites in the south had little power. After the war the money power simply shifted but the plight of Southern working class whites did not change. It became worse as massive numbers of freed slave's caused further depression in wages among the poor White workers. segregation was simply a bone the ruling class gave the white poor so the moneyed class could exploit black and white workers. The invasion of the south again in the 50's by northen business interests under cover of human rights was the last straw for white southern workers.

    They a small percentage came out swinging but unfortunatly as is usually goes instead of attacking the oppressive ruling class they attacked the bottom.

    "THE CURSE OF CAPITALIST SLAVERY UNDER THE PLANTATION SYSTEM AND ITS SIDE ISSUES UNFORTUNEATLY WILL NEVER END" without a revolutionary struggle

  3. Guy who remembers names

    Hey everybody. Read Tom Metzger's comment above.

    If he is the real Tom Metzger then it is worth reading as he a former Klan Grand Dragon. Got his own wikipedia article, Tom Metzger (white supremacist), and a Nova TV program on how his group White Arayan Resistance murdered a guy based on race.

    The real McCoy. And not in a good way.

© 2006-2015 Blue and White Publishing Inc.