@ugh This is what they call inside baseball. Spec and Bwog folk trade meaningless barbs, and both end up looking petty and stupid. How ’bout you leave that for your publication circle jerks, k?
@hehe such huge egos. Spec sucks. Horrendous writing. Will print absolutely anything on the op ed page. Bwog – less snarky and incisive than in days gone by, but still a good place to check out whats going on. Fed – used to be funny, sort of.
@UMM! IF I POST MY OPINIONS IN CAPITAL LETTERS THEY ARE AUTOMATICALLY MORE VALID. MAYBE IF I’M LUCKY I WILL EVEN BE VALIDATED BY HAVING MY COMMENT PUT ON THE SIDEBAR. I HAVE ALWAYS WANTED TO BE SOMEONE’S FAVORITE SOMETHING.
@... Agreeing with comment #1. I was in Spain at the time Barajas happened, and it wasn’t a joke then and isn’t now. For you to post that picture here in this context is just grossly insensitive, and is a wonderful example of how far down the tubes you’ve gone.
Honestly, QuickSpec isn’t even worth it. It’s links to just another website, links whose text have little to no correlation to the actual article, and generally just trash everyone and everything. Just another example of this site’s overwhelming hubris.
@Overwhelming hubris? Or overwhelming inferiority complex to the Spec?
Remember, the B&W are the people who will always resort to telling themselves they’re better than the Spec, going so far as to write an utterly baseless and idiotic article a year ago claiming that the Spec was racist. Gee, that went really well, didn’t it B&W?
@oh freshman You’re clearly a freshman writer for Spec and you have no idea what you’re talking about. I give you until the end of this year, tops. Then if you’re any good you’ll find another publication.
The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members.
A comment may be moderated if it contains:
A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
22 Comments
@ugh This is what they call inside baseball. Spec and Bwog folk trade meaningless barbs, and both end up looking petty and stupid. How ’bout you leave that for your publication circle jerks, k?
@Bwogger Speaking of which, when is hte next publication circle jerk? John? Lydia? Chas? Care to fill me in?
@GEOMETER THE CIRCLE JERK IS THE MOST RADIALLY SYMMETRIC OF ALL THE MASTURBATORY ACTS. MOST PLEASING.
@hehe such huge egos. Spec sucks. Horrendous writing. Will print absolutely anything on the op ed page. Bwog – less snarky and incisive than in days gone by, but still a good place to check out whats going on. Fed – used to be funny, sort of.
@agreed spec’s op eds are completely void of substance, or purpose.
@let me guess you’re a club hockey player, eh?
@Yo... M. Dianne is absolutely not so far so good. She simply doesn’t understand athletics.
@WOW I LOVE ACID!!!!!!
@UMM! IF I POST MY OPINIONS IN CAPITAL LETTERS THEY ARE AUTOMATICALLY MORE VALID. MAYBE IF I’M LUCKY I WILL EVEN BE VALIDATED BY HAVING MY COMMENT PUT ON THE SIDEBAR. I HAVE ALWAYS WANTED TO BE SOMEONE’S FAVORITE SOMETHING.
@The King of Spain NO PICTURES OF BAD THINGS THAT ARE NOT SAD. HUMOR IS WRONG. PEOPLE DIED. IT IS SACRED.
YOU ARE NOT CRYING. YOU BASTARD.
@fed sucks
@ARGHH I HATE THE BWOG SO MUCH THAT I WILL CONTINUE TO READ IT AND COMMENT ON ITS WORK
@INDEED MY HATRED FUELS MY ETERNAL PATRONAGE TO THE ALL MIGHTY BWOG.
@dang... You guys don’t even link to the epic Sports column that mentions BWOG?! Shame.
@curious Does anyone know who the student is in the bomb article?? So curious!
@-.- the links don’t work!
@what a tasteless picture, bwog. people actually died in the explosion in madrid, you insensitive assholes.
@yeah replace it with a picture of the world trade center, everyone knows that was a hoax
@shutup Idiot.
@... Agreeing with comment #1. I was in Spain at the time Barajas happened, and it wasn’t a joke then and isn’t now. For you to post that picture here in this context is just grossly insensitive, and is a wonderful example of how far down the tubes you’ve gone.
Honestly, QuickSpec isn’t even worth it. It’s links to just another website, links whose text have little to no correlation to the actual article, and generally just trash everyone and everything. Just another example of this site’s overwhelming hubris.
@Overwhelming hubris? Or overwhelming inferiority complex to the Spec?
Remember, the B&W are the people who will always resort to telling themselves they’re better than the Spec, going so far as to write an utterly baseless and idiotic article a year ago claiming that the Spec was racist. Gee, that went really well, didn’t it B&W?
@oh freshman You’re clearly a freshman writer for Spec and you have no idea what you’re talking about. I give you until the end of this year, tops. Then if you’re any good you’ll find another publication.