Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

QuickSpec: April Funnies Edition

No power struggles with new Provost, says PrezBo.

Noteworthy politician who previously liked to turn us down, to speak on Class Day.

Two hours, nine judges, and PrezBo’s haircut.  It all comes down to this?

Hey! something new: Columbia hates ROTC.

Hobsbawm revises revisionist history, again. 

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

5 Comments

  • Say My, says:

    @Say My, yeah. these kinds of things stopped being funny years ago, bwog.

    how about a real quickspec?

  • ehhh says:

    @ehhh april fools…

  • come again? says:

    @come again? “If you are against the war, you are against having ROTC on Columbia’s campuses.”

    …that’s just not fucking true.

    I, for one, would take comfort knowing that at least some of the officers leading my military have taken CC. The reasons for keeping ROTC off campus are weak. If it’s not the army’s asinine stance on homosexuality, it’ll be another thing. Let them back on.

    1. not on this campus says:

      @not on this campus ROTC should definitely stay off campus (and will, thanks to the University Senate vote a few years ago), but a dislike of the military in general is not a good enough reason. I was active in the anti-ROTC campaign that preceded the senate vote, and it drove me INSANE that instead of just adhering to the only pertinent anti-ROTC argument (namely, that the military’s stance on gays violates the university’s non-discrimination clause), many people tried to claim that because “war is bad,” ROTC has no place here. the logical problems with that argument are astounding. and i agree with #3–I want people in the military to have taken the Core.

  • for Columbia ROTC says:

    @for Columbia ROTC Read the case for ROTC at Columbia:
    http://www.advocatesforrotc.org/columbia/case/index.html

  • Have Your Say

    What should you actually Venmo people for?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    The article sticks to the facts that are known and doesn't presume anything more. What would be unethical is to (read more)
    Barnard Affiliate Charged With Murder
    February 26, 2020
    The article has been updated with this correction. We regret the error. (read more)
    Barnard Affiliate Charged With Murder
    February 26, 2020
    What about justice for Innell (read more)
    Barnard Affiliate Charged With Murder
    February 26, 2020
    #Justice4Innell (read more)
    Barnard Affiliate Charged With Murder
    February 26, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel