Lili Brown spoke with our friends over at Spectator to better understand their Managing Board’s restructuring.
Yesterday, Spectrum released Spectator’s new Managing Board, and some clear structural changes have been made to a long-standing newspaper and tradition on Columbia’s campus. This will be Spectator’s first year without the formal title of “Editor-in-Chief” heading its Managing Board; instead, this is the beginning of a board headed by an “Executive Editor.” The new position covers a large domain of titles and responsibilities: the individual in charge of all editorial processes is now also the President of Spectator Publishing Company, which seemingly adds a business aspect to what was previously a mostly editorial position.
To discuss the motivations for and the process of this marked change in Spectator’s organization, Bwog contacted the inaugural Executive Editor, Michael Ouimette, who filled in some of the holes not addressed in the formal Spectrum release.
Michael, who served as Publisher of Spectator on the 138th Managing Board, sees the structural changes to the board to fit the fact that Spectator now offers more diverse content. Between its traditional journalistic aspects and productions of Spectator Publishing Company — such as Courses@CU — Spectator is dedicated to providing as much information as possible to Columbia students. According to Michael, the best way to address the newfound scale and diversity of Spectator’s content is to unite all of the aspects of the newspaper under one position. This also contributes to a more unified main goal of Spectator: to provide information to students.
Michael recognizes that the changes might be confusion considering his business and publishing background within Spectator, but the Executive Editor is to be solely an editorial position. He states, “Though I am coming from a publishing role, this should not diminish my role in an editorial position.” The main difference here in responsibility is that of a broader allocation of resources; the Executive Editor is now also the President of Spectator Publishing Company. Under the Executive Editor, the resources will be allocated from an editorial standpoint, given that this power has shifted from Publisher to Executive Editor.
His newfound position was overseen by Spectator’s “Turkeyshoot Board,” which is comprised of current Managing Board members who are not returning to the staff and are in charge of the editing process of Spectator.
The new position and structure was not a “spontaneously generated idea,” and has been in discussion in Spectator circles for the past few years. This fall, the decision was approved by Spectator’s Board of Trustees as well as the Turkeyshoot Board. Michael also pointed out that The Harvard Crimson and The Daily Pennsylvanian, Ivy journalistic counterparts, use a similar structure to that of the new Spectator Managing Board.
With regard to other changes in the board, a question posed in the comments section of the Spectrum’s release noted the removal of a multimedia/video editor from the Managing Board. In previous years there has been a separate multimedia/video section of Spectator. However, Michael explained that in restructuring the Managing Board, they would like to see videos embedded in all other various sections of Spectator. Each section of Spectator will have its own multimedia editor.
In the wake of lots of change and the beginning of a Spectator run by an Executive Editor, Michael is “most excited to up the news Spec releases” and continue to expand their content.
Ch-ch-ch-changes via Shutterstock.
17 Comments
@Alum “Yesterday, Spectrum released Spectator’s new Managing Board….”
Spectrum was holding them hostage?
@Anonymous since when is bwog spec’s bitch?
@Hm The fact that Bwog favorited that comment reeks of desperation…
@I heard That the reason no editor in chief was elected was at least partly because people didn’t like the only person who was a contend or and so they abolished it rather than let him win the position…
@concerned bwogger what the fuck does this have to do with rape or black people or both
@Anonymous Hush,child. Grownups are talking.
@formerspeccie Although I have nothing against Ouimette, I do have concerns about someone who hasn’t written a page of content for Spec becoming the lead content editor on all the stories. Especially because Spec doesn’t call its reporters in for edits and most edits are over google docs etc. it’s already so easy for things to get lost in translation between editors and reporters. I’m not sure how having someone who hasn’t been a reporter for Spec before edit and oversee content will help with that problem. I don’t know if he will know what to expect from reporters (for instance in terms of the turnover of sources etc.) or whether his expectations will be realistic since they won’t be grounded in former reporting work on his part.
@Anonymous Agreed. Above all else, Abby’s strong reporting background meant a lot.
@Anonymous He went to Dalton. He can write.
@Yo English as fuck, bro.
@hmm Do you mean involved in content period or writing for content? Because plenty of previous EICs have come from non-writing sections, eg Design.
@Worrisome Isn’t this a worrying meld of the business and editorial sides? What happened to the Chinese Wall?
I’m sure Michael will navigate the conflicting business/news/editorial roles gracefully, but what happens 5 or 10 years from now?
@opinionated Ugh, this reads like a press release. Just run the numbers and positions.
-1 editor-in-chief, -1 opinion editor, -1 sports editor, -1 video editor, -1 Chief operating officer, -1 Chief development officer
+1 executive editor, +1 “digital features” editor, +1 Director of Product & Audience Development, +1 Director of Events, +1 Director of Sales
I would love to see what Spec alumni think of this. They seemed vocally supportive of the print reduction, but this is a whole nother ball game.
@former mb Partly why alumni were happy, especially the trustees, is that it means that they don’t need to subsidize spec’s business section anymore.
@Anonymous ^This is kind of misleading; before 138 there were 4 directors in the business section on mb (http://www.wikicu.com/Managing_Board_of_the_Columbia_Daily_Spectator)
@What about this? Editor in chief
The editor in chief is responsible for all aspects of the publications of the Spectator Publishing Company. S(he) ensures that the publications are producing top-quality journalism that lives up to Spectator’s mission. The EIC helps oversee Spectator as an organization in conjunction with the Executive Editor, the Managing Editor, and the Publisher. The EIC is responsible for ensuring that SPC’s publications maintain good working relationships with all members of the campus and surrounding communities. The EIC should spend equal amounts of time focused on the daily, Spectrum, and The Eye. The EIC consults with the Executive Editor and the Managing Editor when making important editorial decisions. The EIC provides regular feedback to editors, works with the staff director to develop training for content staff members, and holds educational workshops throughout the year. The EIC also works with the Executive Editor on longterm thinking about ways to improve the publications of SPC. S(he) is a vice president of the Spectator Publishing Company.
@yeah the point is that they didn’t elect an EIC, only an Executive Editor, Publisher, and then Managing Editor