Dec

7

Two Iranians Pedal for Peace

Written by

Zahra Khimji and Bwog editor Maryam Parhizkar write about a very long cycling trip with a very noble mission.

zahraWhile in the United States people are constantly striving for ways to save the environment and stop global warming, Iranians too are striving for ways to promote peace environmental awareness.  Somayeh Yousefi and Jafar Edrisi, an athletic couple who first met on a mountain peak near Tehran in 1998, are just such people — this year, the Iranian cyclists began their journey to promote peace and environmental conservation, one country at a time.

Professor Dennis Dalton, well-known in the last few months for taking part in the recent hunger strike, introduced the event. “This word, peace — that matters most to me,” Professor Dalton said, while physically pointing to the word on the large banner hung on the table in front of the room.  Dalton warmly welcomed the cyclists, stating that although we must work to resolve conflict that we had gotten into with Iran, “violence spreads like a cancer . . . we are plagued with that cancer now, and we must cure it.”

Yousefi and Edrisi then proceeded to explain their mission, which involves cycling around the world and creating a “green line” of newly planted trees along the way to promote peace and environmental awareness. “No one will be living in a peaceful world without the environment,” Yousefi, the English speaker of the two, said. Yousefi and Edrisi have been tracking every step of their trip and blogging whenever they have the chance. Starting from Iran, they have cycled through major parts of Europe such as Greece, Italy, France, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and have crossed the Atlantic ocean (by flight, of course!). As of today, the couple has planted a total of 14 trees, with 2 in New York State.



According to senior Shirin Soufiyan, one of the organizers of the event, Somayeh and Jafar’s were invited by an individual group of Iranian students on campus, who had heard about the cyclists’ journey through a news article. The students were able to reserve space for the event thanks to the Sephardic Club at Hillel.

“They sold their car, everything, and decided one day to go on this trip to promote peace,’ Maryam Fereydoun, another organizer said. The couple has often stayed economical by cooking their own food pitching their tent in public areas to rest. However, since gaining attention from the media, they’ve received hundreds of emails from people all over the globe, inviting them to be their guests. “We have a lot [of invitations], ” Yousefi said, “and now we have to choose to go to their houses!”

Yousefi and Edrisi noted that the process of organization for them was tedious in that they have had to ask for visas and special permission to travel from country to country and cross borders legally. There have been other problems, inevitably — in the first week of being in New York the couple had suffered flat tires and gotten lost, but have always managed to find help along the way.”The place that gave us the easiest time with our visas was the US,” Yousoufi said. “In fact, we were touched by the hospitality of the people that we first met.”

Yousoufi went on to describe the couple’s interaction with an American woman that had housed them on their first night in the United States, whilst showing a slideshow of their travels and the different lands they have crossed. After they had finished speaking, the pair took questions from the crowd, including concerns about environmental activist groups in Iran. The couple made note that after the Gulf War with Iraq, Iran had lost many of its animals and natural attractions; recently government groups there have been working to rehabilitate natural habitats, and the Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization has begun teaching courses on Iran’s environment to proactive citizens.

While images of Tehran floated across the screen, one woman in the audience expressed her concerns about the couples’ invitation to visit their country. “What do you feel about the present [political] situation as Iranians? . . . How is it to live in Iran? Why should I go there?” she asked.

The couple answered the question to the best of their abilities. “It is not [a dangerous place], we cannot make decisions for 17 million people… in Iran I am just like this,” Yousefi said, making reference to her colorful headscarf and sleeve-covered arms. “I am a normal citizen, but I don’t know about politicians.”

“It is very natural to fear the unknown,” Edrisi, translated by a student, said, “but once immersed in the culture you learn to appreciate very different perspectives. Go to the right people and the right places; there are places there of course, like anywhere, that are unfit for foreigners.’

 By the end of the discussion, the couple invited the audience to sign their “Cycling the World for Peace” banner, filled with positive inscriptions from those they have met. In polite Iranian gesture, they invited the entire audience to stand behind them with the banner in front for photographs. In good nature and smiles, everyone took part.

Yousefi and Edrisi hope to complete their journey within the next two years, with a coast-to-coast tour of the US in coming months. You can find out more and track this couple as they continue to tour the USA, by going to www.rmc4peace.com.

Tags: , , ,

11 Comments

  1. SAD  

    this "mission" is retarded

  2. why?  

    seriously why? what could you possibly find objectionable about what they're doing?

    I could see how one could argue that this doesn't tangibly create peace or a more sustainable environmental future, but if nothing else it most definitely starts a dialogue about these issues. clearly their goal seems to have garnered a fair amount of attention - i seriously don't see what there is to dislike.

    if it's too cheesy for you, then there's a very logical choice that you can make: don't circumnavigate the globe on a bike for peace and environmental sustainability

  3. SAD  

    i've already chosen not to "circumnavigate the globe on a bike for peace and environmental sustainability"

    you sir are retarded

    • #2 still: cmon  

      you (presumably) go to Columbia: i'm convinced you're smart enough not to resort to attacks to make your point -- i tried not to attack you, even though your comments piss me off.

      so c'mon, answer the question: what do you find objectionable about what they're doing?

      • lol  

        i can't believe you're actually trying to hold a serious argument in bwog's comment section!

      • guys...  

        I can speak for myself (a person who does not use the word "retarded" lightly), and say that the advertising for this event was awful. "What have you done for peace? These IRANIANS have been circumnavigating the globe for peace."
        First of all, why capitalize Iranians? Are you implying that I should be surprised that any Iranians are working towards peace? Are you trying to highlight it, as if that's the special thing about this event ("ooooh, Iranians!")? I can't come up with a reason to capitalize that word. Help?
        Second of all, the "What have you done for peace" is annoying and confrontational. You couldn't make casual passers-by more hostile to peace if you tried.
        What have I done for peace - screw that, what has peace done for me?
        What have I done for peace? Gosh, I haven't been actively physically violent?
        What on earth could be a valid response to that question? Even "I rode a bicycle a whole bunch and talked to a lot of people" doesn't really sound like a good answer. Unless, of course, it's backed up with this mealy-mouthed, knee-jerk, bland "it generates dialogue" argument.
        Fine. I'm done being manipulated. I think I can speak for a lot of people when I say that I'm tired of people thinking that they know the one thing that I should want: more "dialogue".
        And that's what I found objectionable about the advertising for the event. I didn't attend, for what I hope are now obvious reasons.

        • i see  

          what you're saying that dialogue is a sort of a fall back that people use to justify stuff that lacks substance, and maybe i did it a disservice by using the dialogue argument.

          and i never even heard about this even much less attended, so maybe it actually sucked, that's not what bothered me about 1/3/6. its just that i feel like there's this stupid-ass attitude at Columbia that goes beyond apathy at some points, where people don't just say "i don't give a fuck" but they extend that logic to "anybody who does give a fuck is gay/ retarded/ generic un-PC insult" which just pisses me off.

          If you don't give a shit fine, but don't diminish what gives other people's lives meaning ya know?

          • No, you shut up  

            Seriously, why is it that no one is allowed to express an opinion as a Bwog Comment which states that maybe, just maybe, we shouldn't hide behind the safety of anonymity and snipe at other people, especially when everyone else is allowed to spew any and every kind of vitriol imaginable?

            Why is it that any challenge to that "right" is invariably met with attempts to infantilize or otherwise invalidate their commentary, attempts which invariably cast the attackers as the petulant children instead of the offending commentor. If you can't defend the position you've asserted with non-playground bully terms, have you considered the fact that perhaps its just untenable and that if it were to be associated with you --if you could not cloak yourself in the anonymity Bwog so generously provides you-- that you would never be caught dead defending it?

            Either grow a pair or stop playing dress up.

  4. this

    is wonderful! thanks for reporting.

© 2006-2015 Blue and White Publishing Inc.