Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

Possible Progress on Study Days Mess

Study days revolt!One or two (but certainly not three!) of you had something to say about last semester’s unfortunate Study Day(s?) timing. No one wants to study for Econometrics two days before Christmas, so Marisa Rama and Jordan Hewson, both CC ’12, created a Facebook group as a form of petition against future years following the same winter break calendar.

According to Rama, 1,647 people have written on the group’s wall, adding their names to a petition being brought to the University Senate this Friday the 29th. The petition, copy-pasted from the Facebook wall, was sent to the offices of the Registrar and the Provost last night, but names are still being collected in the group.

Bwog should have an update on the Study Day Debacle from the student government perspective soon.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

1 Comment

  • ... says:

    @... Tempest in a teapot?

  • Have Your Say

    What should you actually Venmo people for?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    That is not legally true. Context such as self-defense or mental illness can excuse murder. This isn't the National Enquirer (read more)
    Barnard Affiliate Charged With Murder
    February 26, 2020
    This is fucked (read more)
    Barnard Affiliate Charged With Murder
    February 26, 2020
    How can you call yourself student news when you erase her narrative. You not only had the chance to (read more)
    Barnard Affiliate Charged With Murder
    February 26, 2020
    "Imagine the deep trauma and pain she is going through" "biased harmful narrative" This is a news story reporting the facts (read more)
    Barnard Affiliate Charged With Murder
    February 26, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel