Sexism…it’s in your language!
Activism…it’s gone!
Racism…it’s in gentrification!
Zionism…it doesn’t recognize Nakba!
Spectator-ism…it sucks!?
Sexism…it’s in your language!
Activism…it’s gone!
Racism…it’s in gentrification!
Zionism…it doesn’t recognize Nakba!
Spectator-ism…it sucks!?
13 Comments
@aha!- I get what your saying. Everyone knows that Jimmy Carter is a Palestinian, right?
@Hmmmmm.... So what is David Judd? A Palestinian or an Israeli?
@cem take a wild guess. or maybe just base it on the fact that anybody unaffiliated doesn’t care enough to moan about it.
@WHY OH WHY do the Israeli and Palestinian camps have to take their wars here?! why can’t they fight and kill each other back in the middle east? why can’t they leave each other alone and die and peace?! NOBODY HERE CARES
@................... I’ll tell you what sucks. Bwogism.
@sincere question is that distinct from Bwog sucking? if so, how?
@hmmmmm Agreed on #4!
@you guys you guys are all poopy people eaters.
@various thoughts a) #2 is correct. annoying format, bwog.
b) go finn!
c) the “sexism” one is right on one point – at least in philosophy writing, even anglo-american, its become conventional to use “she” as a gender neutral pronoun, and this reads pretty naturally after only a few examples. it’s really far superior to attempts to invent new words.
d) i would think that the gossip-blog worthy part of the “zionism” one is that it calls out columbia hillel specifically…
@Hmmmm Agreed on B! Go Finn!
@anonymous Language is not sexist, you stupid ho.
@wag These formulations … they’re fucking intolerable!
@curious Why is the sexism/languages article listed under the Spec’s news section?
Sticking quotations into an op-ed piece doesn’t transform an article into “news.”