LectureHop: Obama Girl


Lecture Hop editor Pierce Stanley reports on a strange visitor in the hallowed halls of American history.

(Hi Daily Intelligencer!)



Recent semesters at Columbia have seen the arrival of some of the world’s brightest and most eloquent speakers at fair Alma, broadening academic discourse on campus in a very fruitful way. Unfortunately, for all of the good speakers that come to Columbia, some bad ones happen to slip through the cracks. Indeed, these years have also been witness to some of the most controversial, questionable, and even disgraceful speakers on campus in recent years.

The appearance this afternoon of Obama Girl (a.k.a. actress Amber Lee Ettinger) in Professor David Eisenbach’s American Presidency history course likely falls into the latter category, with Eisenbach’s choice of speaker being questionable at best.  Amber’s visit this evening to Mike Gravel’s Communications Director’s course (just in case you missed her live-chat on YouTube last night) sparked both interest in the topic at hand–the role of viral videos and the YouTube generation in determining the eventual outcome of the 2008 Presidential election–and it sparked much controversy as to whether a minor actress (who doesn’t even do her own singing, failed to vote in the last election, and claims that she does not even really have a crush on one of Columbia’s favorite alums) should receive such a reception in the hallowed halls of the classroom.  Many Columbia students left the classroom in IAB befuddled by Amber’s appearance and by Professor Eisenbach’s impromptu decision to hold such an event.  Some left not knowing quite what to make of Obama Girl’s appearance on campus.  Overheard: “Are we really paying $40,000 plus a year to line up and take pictures with her like shes Santa?  I feel like a five year old kid again.”

Amber spoke about a total of ten words this evening. This worked out well, because the mastermind behind the website barelypolitical.com, Ben Relles, handled the bulk of the class’s queries quite well, mixing videos from his site with a rather engaging explanation about the nature of his enterprise. Relles argued that hopefully viewers of the Obama Girl video will be able to gain some interest in the candidate and perhaps the political process as a whole. Relles indicated that while he is delighted that candidates are forced to actually watch and respond to these videos, his original intention was not to provoke political events. The video’s main goal, according to Relles, is to create an online culture of humor surrounding the political process.

University of Chicago senior Michael Stevens, the creator of the Barack O’Bollywood gem, characterized Internet video humor as emblematic of the next generation of voters. Eisenbach suggested that perhaps YouTube, viral videos in the vein of Obama Girl (and all of her competitors including the McCain Girls and Hott 4 Hill Girl), and even blogs are the future of American politics. They are one step ahead of traditional media sources and reach the younger generations, all a plus in a country that is increasingly apathetic about politics. But what does this all mean about the American public if the information that they get about politicians comes exclusively from satirical online video shorts?

While Professor Eisenbach’s email to the course last night seemed to indicate that the Obama Girl herself would field many of the questions, the event turned into a montage of all the videos that Relles had made for his website. Later, it became a photo-shoot with the budding young actress. However, most were left wondering whether they had just killed an hour and fifteen minutes watching YouTube videos that they would have come across anyway while they put off writing a paper.

Perhaps it is still far too early to tell the impact of this movement on elections, but Professor Eisenbach may have put it best when he asked a gushing Obama Girl, “What do you think of the prospect that college classes on the Presidency may be watching your very video a hundred years from now to demonstrate its lasting impact?” Obama Girl just smiled and replied coyly, “That’s why you’re a professor.”

- PHS


  • AlexandraPosted from campus

    Shout out to Mr. Grumbach

  • PiercePosted from campus

    Jake, this one is a classic for all days to come

  • ...Posted from campus

    a stylized t-shirt “it’s as real as it gets san francisco general hospital”… i don’t get it. is it related to the book with the same title? the book appears to have disappeared into obscurity…

    • JakePosted from campus

      And how hard is it to understand my shirt? SF General is a public hospital that treats underserved and uninsured patients, and they thus keep it real over there. That’s where the doctors who wanna make a difference go, instead of treating old ladies with headaches on the Upper East Side. And the primary care physicians at public hospitals like SF General make less than a quarter of what the private specialists make.

      As real as it gets.

  • RayPosted from campus

    Her outfit is hideous. You can’t wear a sack without a belt.

  • fashion police

    You would have at lest expected her to look sexy. That was the whole point, if there ever was one. She should have come wearing the same attire that she wore in the Obama flick.

  • randomPosted from campus

    damn Jake! You look like you are enjoying that picture a little too much. Out of curiosity, where is your right hand at in that picture?

  • hmmmPosted from campus

    Hmm I don’t pay over 40k per year (scholarships/finaid) so I guess it is ok if I waste time with the Obama Girl!

  • pleasePosted from campus

    fire eisenbach. worst professor ever. He seems to be actively trying to discredit himself, from being a Mike Gravel groupie, to hosting his bizarre friendly fire which evolved into a Gravel love fest, to this hilarious if totally wortheless stunt. all eisenbach wants is attention, and he’s willing to stoop as low as is necessary to get it. all spectacle, no substance, give the fool the boot, please!

    • please

      dave is the man. his class was probably my favorite one freshman year. one of the reasons i stuck it out for a second.

    • seriouslyPosted from campus

      right fucking on. can we get rid of this clown already? does he have tenure? how ’bout we wage an abu-el-haj/MEALAC style public smear campaign? he’s a gravel campaign director, he must be somehow associated with some sort of harsh rhetorical attack on the US or israel, right?

  • veinPosted from campus

    NOT vain.

  • ........

    I would have been envious of those in his class if the Obama girl did in class what she did in the video. Then of course, I would have also fallen on the floor laughing. It’s a two-edged sword, you see…

  • wtf?Posted from campus

    is Eisenbach crazy? how is she relevant at all?

  • seriouslyPosted from campus

    this was the worst thing I ever have sat through in class. It was obvious that every girl in that room was incredibly uncomfortable watching their classmates forsake intellectual enterprise just so they can watch a “hot” girl.

  • What?Posted from campus

    This is just ridiculous. Next up: Perez Hilton lecturing at the J-School.

  • It appearsPosted from campus

    david eisenbach will stop at nothing to receive attention. that is, nothing except actual scholarship or insight.

  • ...Posted from campus

    if you don’t see the relevance of this, then you are both foolish and narrow minded.

    the democratization of media brought about by widespread adoption of the internet is a fucking sea-change for our culture that is only just getting started. (what the end result of this change will be, and whether it leads out down a desirable path is still an open question…)

    it’s her irrelevance that makes her relevant. she might not have any direct insights to add, but now you’ve seen first hand that anyone can easily participate in the political process regardless of whether they have any power or anything interesting to add. that alone is a very interesting development.

    when he said that she will be in the history books, he was right on the money.

    • IMOPosted from campus

      I don’t really see Obama Girl as being any kind of “sea change”. People have been composing pop/folk songs for presidential candidates for quite a while. All that is new is the medium. I would be extremely surprised if Obama Girl is remembered as anything more than an extremely obscure historical footnote; trivia question fodder.

      So far Eisenbach leeched onto the Minuteman/Ahmedinejad controversies with his Friendly Fire forum, made an enormous deal about his Gravel connections and now he pulled this, which is nothing more than a publicity stunt. Eisenbach is the Paris Hilton of academia.

  • ...Posted from campus

    ps. if you want to talk about publicity stunts, then why don’t we talk about our old friend mahmoud ahmadinejad. there’s been hundreds of mahmoud ahmadinejads throughout history. how many “obama girls” have there been?

    • wellPosted from campus

      how many years has Hawaiian Tropic been doing their Miss Hawaiian Tropic contest?

      • ...Posted from campus

        and how many times has it been relevant to the presidential election. zero.

        your feeble attempt at drawing a parallel fails.

        if you think “obama girl” herself is a sea-change, or the point… then you’re a fucking idiot.

        think! please?

  • honestlyPosted from campus

    I really like Eisenbach and I agree that the internet is important (to be blunt) but this was a total joke. Even the bros in the class seemed unimpressed.

  • Dr. Pangloss

    To maintain this as the best of all possible worlds, we must stamp out cutesy. Cutesy is a fatal disease that turns people into caricatures of themselves.

    Eisenbach is indeed the Paris Hilton of academia. He does not belong at Columbia or at any other institution of learning.

    If he is promoting Obama Girl as the face of New Politics, then let him do it elsewhere.

  • Anonymous

    It’s amazing to find out that there are so many dummies who attend such a great school where I have to pay $40,000 a semester. Most of you really missed the whole point of the topic of discussion, maybe because they were too busy staring at the Obama Girl and not focusing. The Obama Girl was really very well spoken and we should appreciate that she took time out of her day to come join us. I think that most of my classmates are just haters and from what I see, I can undrstand why.

    • anonymous

      It’s just that it seems so ridiculous that any educated person would go in for this Obama crap…

  • Dr. Pangloss

    Hail to anonymous who can see that the emperor is not wearing a stitch of anything worth seeing.

  • JakePosted from campus

    I was trying to get her number. We’ll see how it goes between us hahahaha.

    PS: Eisenbach is the man, and that class was relevant, and you all know that. Obama Girl did almost none of the talking…the guy who wrote/produced the video had some interesting things to say.

    And it beats taking notes for an hour and a quarter

  • Wang

    Barack Obama is the greatest!
    _______________
    SCANDAL! SCANDAL! SCANDAL!

    EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY!

    George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her.

    “In her suit, Margie Schoedinger states that George W. Bush committed sexual crimes against her, organized harassment and moral pressure on her, her family members and close relatives and friends. As Schoedinger said, she was strongly recommended to keep her mouth shut. . . . Furthermore, she alleges that George Bush ordered to show pressure on her to the point, when she commits suicide” (blog of drizzten).

    “One of those ‘very leasts’ [was] George Bush’s personal complicity in the death (murder to be precise) of my friend Margie Schoedinger in September of 2003. Determining the exact whereabouts and contacts of [then] president-elect George Bush on September 21 thru 22, 2003, should be entirely lacking in difficulty” (Leola McConnell—Nevada Progressive Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate in 2010).

    Leola McConnell is correct: Bush applying pressure (continuously criminally stalking Margie Schoedinger) purposefully to force Margie Schoedinger to commit suicide does in fact constitute murder.

    BEWARE: If the president of the United States hates one—for whatever reasons—he can continuously criminally stalk one to the point that one cannot get away from it, and one ultimately commits suicide in desperation to escape. He can murder people in this way.

    Bush is getting away with his murder of Margie Schoedinger—with no sheriff, prosecutor, or court willing to uphold the rule of law.

    Bush’s method of murdering Margie Schoedinger cannot exist in a vacuum: he must have murdered other people in the same way.

    Bush should confess, come out with the names of all of the people whom he murdered in the disgusting way he murdered Margie Schoedinger, undergo execution, and accordingly find himself at the intersection where he would be free.

    (There are thousands of copies of the information above on the Internet. It exists very extensively in all major search engines. Please feel free to go to any major search engine, type “George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her,” hit “Enter,” and find innumerable results.)
    _______________
    Andrew Wang
    (a.k.a. “THE DISSEMINATING MACHINE”)
    B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
    Messiah College, Grantham, PA
    Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

61 °F, Cloudy

Contact Us

It's Bwog, not BWOG.

Follow us on Twitter!

Questions or concerns?

Bwog is always looking for new writing talent. to inquire about contributing.

Housing

Subscribe

Archives

Have Your Say

Which summer plans will you zealously make and then subsequently abandon to watch TV online?

View Results

Comment Policy

Favorite Comments

Recent Comments

Bwogroll

Paying the Bills

NYC Jobs for Columbians

FreshGrad is building software that matches Columbians with Fortune 500‘s. Complete our private beta in 15 min and get $10.

Advertise with Us

Inquire at ads@bwog.com

Upcoming Events

  • View the calendar of campus events!

  • View the Bucket List

  • View Where Art Thou

Lost and Found

  • Lost: Columbia ID (May 11 2012)

    Name: Emily Selinger, lost 5/10 somewhere at Senior Ball, gaslight, or 1020. ess2168@columbia.edu

  • Found: Blue iPod Nano (May 08 2012)

    Found in one of the couches in the Wallach Sky Lounge. Returned to Hartley Hospitality Desk.

  • Lost: Jacket and Scarf (May 03 2012)

    Dark blue-green plaid Old Navy jacket and green scarf. Misplaced in EC on April 30. If found, please email abc2160@columbia.edu. Thank you!

  • Lost: Phone Charger (Apr 28 2012)

    PointMobl Black Retractable Micro USB AC Phone Charger. Lost it in Hartley lounge. E-mail: nnamdi.nwaezeapu@gmail.com

  • Lost: Black High Sierra Backpack (Apr 26 2012)

    Lost a Black High Sierra backpack containing a white binder and a red pencil bag in Ferris Booth Dining Hall on Wednesday, April 25th, around 7:30 to 8pm. It was left on a chair in the second floor in a table around the middle of the room close to the staircase. If spotted someone taking it or found, please call immediately at 208-964-6780 or email rm2999@columbia.edu

  • Lost: Vis a Vis French Textbook (Apr 23 2012)

    Light blue, hardcover. Beginning Level. Lost last Tuesday in the Barnard 2nd floor women’s bathroom.

    If found, please contact jac2295@columbia.edu

  • Lost: Blackberry (Apr 22 2012)

    Lost a Blackberry Bold from Verizon Wireless at ADP on Saturday night. If found please email rsf2121@columbia.edu or call 601-994-3697. There will be a $$ reward!!

  • Lost: Flower Earrings & Mood Ring (Apr 18 2012)

    These were lost potentially on philosophy lawn on the evening of April 17th. The earrings are large silver flower cutouts and the mood ring is a blue band with small flowers inset. Both are old with a lot of sentimental value attached. Would greatly appreciate their return if found. Please contact on2139@columbia.edu/

    646-496-3613, will reward with home baked goods and eternal gratitude.

  • Lost: Droid Phone (Apr 18 2012)

    Droid II Phone without any particular markings. Possibly left at the street fair or in Math. Contact cw2453.

  • Lost: Grey Hamper (Apr 16 2012)

    I left my grey, cylindrical hamper in the Hartley laundry room and when I returned it was gone. I left it on the washing machine farthest from when you first walk in. If you have it, please return it, no questions asked. Email cgs2133@columbia.edu

  • Send us your notices of lost or found items!