Not all beauty on campus is the kind that makes you nostalgic while you’re still here. Some of it falls more into the stunning-glass-building-reflection class. Go enjoy the weather while it’s nice!
@Anonymous I don’t understand the tremendous controversy surrounding this building. Considering the engineering constraints, it’s a wonderful piece of architecture. Designs and materials improve, and a building built more than 100 years later than Pupin and Havemeyer should reflect these changes.
The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members.
A comment may be moderated if it contains:
A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
7 Comments
@Anonymous I heard that the building is so tall that it blocks 9% of the range of view of the telescope on top of Pupin…. fail
@Joe Nice pic!
@Anonymous If it isn’t fashioned from a thousand quarries and topped in precious metals its a travesty. Waaahhh
@Anonymous I don’t understand the tremendous controversy surrounding this building. Considering the engineering constraints, it’s a wonderful piece of architecture. Designs and materials improve, and a building built more than 100 years later than Pupin and Havemeyer should reflect these changes.
@Wow. This is beautiful, and I usually go on rants about what an eyesore this building is…
@Anonymous that photo is so amazing it looks like it was photoshoped. who is ccs? good work!
@Anish Our very own Claire Sabel!