LectureHop: Bill Kristol (no, not that one)

Written by

Analyze THAT!

Analyze THAT!

The latest in the J-School’s Delacorte Lecture featured Fox News contributor and Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol. In a room packed with J-School students and retirees hoping Kristol would use the opportunity to “debunk” global warming, political peer Adam Shapiro listened on.

Professor Victor Navasky (former longtime editor of The Nation) introduced Kristol by mentioning his work for the Reagan and Bush administrations and the McCain 2008 campaign. Navasky then told the audience to brace for “something completely different.”

Kristol began by thanking the Columbia Journalism School for being “fair and balanced” enough to invite a conservative to speak. He candidly talked about becoming Republican, explaining that being conservative was a form of rebellion growing up on the Upper West Side. He half jokingly explained that he later read books to justify the prejudices he developed.

Kristol focused most of his lecture on his belief that the internet is radically reshaping the political and media landscape. Despite his “normal inclination as a conservative to debunk claims of novelty,” he posited that in the last twenty years things have changed at unprecedented speed. As a conservative, he’s enthusiastic about the changes the internet is bringing and sees them as healthy for democracy and good for the individual.

However, he thinks this is only the beginning, comparing it to the invention of the steam engine when people sensed horses would become passé but couldn’t predict passenger trains or cars. Kristol predicts that the next thing to be radically challenged will be university campuses. He compared a physical university campus to a Borders book store; it may be nice but ultimately feels archaic and inefficient.

He shifted to politics today and why he thinks we’re approaching a new era of American politics. He admitted that elites have never failed more than the housing crisis and haven’t been held accountable for their failings. He noted that the nomination of Mitt Romney was almost a caricature of this reality and played into stereotypes the public has about Wall Street and Washington elites. He predicts politics will continue to take an increasingly populist bent and will look more similar to the European political landscape.

He cited Sarah Palin and Obama (in 2008) as people who tapped into populist fervor. He posited that we’re living in a rather unique historical moment that is fluid and unpredictable, and in which we’ll see movements start from the bottom, against elites, which will have profound effects on the direction of the country.

In concluding, Professor Navasky asked how someone who comes across as so reasonable can support such unreasonable social programs, which elicited chuckles.

Tags: , , , , , ,


  1. Anonymous  

    1/4 students in the graduating class of SEAS is from the 3+2 program. It is a scheme for rich people to get guaranteed admission into Columbia for only a 3.3 gpa at schools like kentucky state. The administration thinks they're pulling a fast one on us. But we won't stand for it any longer. They didnt accept these mediocre students in the first place to protect its stats, so why accept them later just to bolster funds? It hurts all of us. Especially, these sub-par imbeciles who don't belong at Columbia.

    We wont stand for this any longer. Thats why we should all go on strike against Columbia

    • Deandra TheNewGirl  


      Well, I don't want to be rude, but that story was VERY long and much more involved than I originally thought it would be, and I've had to poop through most of it.

      So if you'll excuse me....

© 2006-2015 Blue and White Publishing Inc.