11 Comments
Bwog presents a couple of blind items for campaign season. Any guesses?
WHICH Class Council member, running for re-election, admitted to a Bwog reporter at a mandatory candidates’ rules meeting that she was intoxicated? She spent the meeting text-messaging and gossipping about the uselessness of the meeting – and she seemed none too pleased with the top of her ticket, either.
WHICH Class Council member spent all January telling friends she was running against her President, whom she had run with in the last election? She decided against it, ultimately, preventing a fair deal of drama.
And finally, Seth Berliner sends in this report from his Intro to East Asian Civ: Japan class:
Student: So, are you running for University Senator?
Senator-to-Be: Yeah!
Student: I feel like Student Council never gets anything done.
Senator-to-Be: Paper towels!
[pause]
Senator-to-Be: Didn’t you see my e-mail?! I got paper towels installed in eight
frickin’ kitchens!
– DPD
Loading …
11 Comments
@number one only describes one person?
@witness.... Lindsey clearly was not drunk last night
@Number 1 Can’t be Lindsey. She isn’t a councilmember running for reelection. She wasn’t elected to council last year and she is running for Exec Board this year.
@informed poster good guess on the first one, but on 2 & 3 no no no, #5. i’m not sure about #1, but the answer to
#2 is Molly Conley
#3 (the informed pick of the day) is Phil Hadley
When adjusted for the typical columbia curve , i’m sure a solid A- will be coming my way.
@ooh lindsey = cutie though. i wont hold intoxication against her. (hmm i see an opening for a lame line about holding her against me or something)
@watcher I’m game. Let’s say #1 is Lindsey Lazopolous, #2 is Jessica Becker-Venega, and #3 as Daniel Free.
Am I close?
@ummm it wasn’t lindsey
@oh bwog bwog, lets stick to the facts and not make things up. we have enough problems and drama on our own.
@oops #3 you seem to have missed the obvious…bwog adds/leaves out details as they please. so its a gossip blog, so thats fine. now i only get pissed when they try to pass it off as real reporting. and tell people that they are “obliged” to answer their questions.
@gossip rag is gossipy
@confidential? if this is what bwog does with confidential sources, thats pretty shitty