@Anonymous Why do people immediately assume that if bwog posts a picture depicting heterosexual male desires, it does not acknowledge the desires of homosexuals? People need lessons in logic.
@... and to think, i thought the whole point of a $200,000.00 columbian educational odyssey was to be able to click on links labeled NSFW in public with no fear or shame…
@Anonymous dudes calm down. I look at weird hilarious shit all the time in lecture and I’m sure people are freaked out by it. It’s not like he was masturbating or something. He probably found the image just as funny as Bwog found it. And I’m sure people are looking at this image via blog in lecture right now. He shouldn’t be embarrassed! C
@Anonymous I agree. This could potentially ruin his life or at the very least just severely embarrass him. I don’t think anyone would like something like this being posted on a campus-wide blog, especially because there is enough facial detail for a friend of his to know it’s him.
@Anonymous I believe bwog has steppéd over the génder line. By posting this the bwog is only promoting stereotypes about mén and encouraging this revelrous béhavior, labelling it as the norm. Notice how they post a straight male and his heterosexual desires! That is right, the very tolerane and opennness taht defines our campus is under seige and we a thé spécsucsk community will fight back!
This only feéding the pérvading overcautious superegos that force individuals to engagé in unecessary Epicureanism and orgliciousnéss in a sad attémpt to fit in. Moreover, this directly contradicts the various articlés on the spéc repudiating gendér discrimination and violence agaisnt womén. Shamé on you bwog, shame on you (I think that close up will give little childrén nightmares for théi duration of their short lives on columbia campus before they die of syphalis while older men and women will die of bubonic plage with a 99% fatality rate). For the sake of Barnard children, think before you post.
The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members.
A comment may be moderated if it contains:
A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
26 Comments
@Dale Very good post! We are linking to this great post on our website.
Keep up the good writing.
My page:Pacquiao Bradley
@If you know the anime you can find it easily on danbooru.
@Yeah http://gifb.in/E8sV
@anyone have the link to that porn site?
@Sure do Heres the link: http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/www.mediaite-1.jpeg
@nwbar I can’t top this.
@Anonymous Why do people immediately assume that if bwog posts a picture depicting heterosexual male desires, it does not acknowledge the desires of homosexuals? People need lessons in logic.
@I provide sauce http://danbooru.donmai.us/post/show/990092
@Peix OMG K-ON!!!!
Azunyan <3333
@Anonymous is K-On as good as people say it is?
@Anonymous Eh, it’s all right. Highly dependent on whether or not you enjoy slice of life.
@... and to think, i thought the whole point of a $200,000.00 columbian educational odyssey was to be able to click on links labeled NSFW in public with no fear or shame…
@Anonymous dudes calm down. I look at weird hilarious shit all the time in lecture and I’m sure people are freaked out by it. It’s not like he was masturbating or something. He probably found the image just as funny as Bwog found it. And I’m sure people are looking at this image via blog in lecture right now. He shouldn’t be embarrassed! C
@He Who Walks Behind the Rows Giggity.
@studious stanley golly, from where I was sitting I thought it was just benzene
@Anonymous but benzene is a 6 membered ring, not a 5 membered ring. it looks like pentane!
@i'm gonna be that guy by saying: you mean ‘cyclopentane’
@Anonymous or cyclopentadiene.
@That's a different Website The six-membered pictures are part of a different genre.
@Anonymous Bwog, you should at the very least blur out the guy’s face.
@How DARE you? I’m not a stereotype!
I drive well, I’m super social, I fucking hate math, and…and…what do you mean, show you my computer?!
@Anonymous Look, this isn’t appropriate to post.
@Anonymous I agree. This could potentially ruin his life or at the very least just severely embarrass him. I don’t think anyone would like something like this being posted on a campus-wide blog, especially because there is enough facial detail for a friend of his to know it’s him.
This is in really, really bad taste.
@Anonymous Playing devil’s advocate here. What was he expecting, watching that stuff in public?
@Anonymous I believe bwog has steppéd over the génder line. By posting this the bwog is only promoting stereotypes about mén and encouraging this revelrous béhavior, labelling it as the norm. Notice how they post a straight male and his heterosexual desires! That is right, the very tolerane and opennness taht defines our campus is under seige and we a thé spécsucsk community will fight back!
This only feéding the pérvading overcautious superegos that force individuals to engagé in unecessary Epicureanism and orgliciousnéss in a sad attémpt to fit in. Moreover, this directly contradicts the various articlés on the spéc repudiating gendér discrimination and violence agaisnt womén. Shamé on you bwog, shame on you (I think that close up will give little childrén nightmares for théi duration of their short lives on columbia campus before they die of syphalis while older men and women will die of bubonic plage with a 99% fatality rate). For the sake of Barnard children, think before you post.
spécsucks.wordpress.com
@Cool joke, brah Needs some editing.