Connect with us

All Articles

World Leaders Forum Talks Islam And Media With Vuslat Doǧan Sabanci

A commissioned portrait of Vuslat Doǧan Sabanci at a sunny desk Turkey

Vuslat Doǧan Sabanci That’s way neater than prezbo’s de

Vuslat Doǧan Sabanci, SIPA ’96 and the chairwoman of the Turkish news giant Hürriyet, came to Columbia as part of the World Leader’s Forum to discuss the connection between Islam and the media, and her personal experience as a self-proclaimed moderate Muslim.

“I am a Muslim woman,” Vuslat Doǧan Sabanci proclaimed to start her address in Low Library. After President Bollinger gave the introduction to “Fostering a Better Conversation and Understanding of Islam: The Vital Role of Media,” Doǧan Sabanci spoke about her view of the responsibilities of the East and West to combat Islamophobia and its effects. The event ended with a (relatively hostile) Q&A session with Doǧan Sabanci and Bollinger.

(Before I begin actual coverage, I would like to highlight the very first stumbling words out of PrezBo’s mouth at the event: “The Columbia Worlds Forum- World Forum… World Leaders Forum.”)

The most important thing in Doǧan Sabanci’s CV, according to her on Tuesday, was not her feminist activism or media accomplishments, but, “Of course, it is being a Columbia graduate.” When she graduated 21 years ago, she was convinced that globalism would lead to the world’s nations becoming one happy family. However, countries have instead retreated, becoming “hostile villages.” The new media led to accelerated polarization, and “attention became the new currency” for the media. Digital media did not fulfill its promise of promoting communication. Doǧan Sabanci targeted communication, between individuals and civilizations, as the key to successful Globalization. Her keys for better conversations included listening attentively, acknowledging each other, and displaying compassion.

On the topic of Islam, she referred to Islamophobia as a “vicious circle,” where the West’s demonization of the Middle East becomes propaganda material for extremist groups and fails to engender compassion. But, she claims, there is “responsibility on the part of Muslims, too.” The onus for better conversation falls on all parties. It falls upon moderate Muslims, she argues, to share their stories, and it especially falls on the media in all countries to present those stories and change the narratives around Muslims. For the sake of refugees, and for the larger goal of pluralism, the media must not channel “hatred and fear, but wisdom and reasoning.”

The questions for Doǧan Sabanci asked her questions in her capacity as the chairwoman of Hürriyet, a publication whose editors are mostly against an authoritarian amendment to the Turkish constitution presented by President Erdogan which will soon go to public referendum. Audience members brought up the choice not to publish an interview with a Nobel Prize laureate who spoke out against Erdogan. Another questioner wondered why, when two Hürriyet members presented their political opinions, only the anti-Erdogan anchor was silenced. Doǧan Sabanci had answers for both scenarios, referring to a miscommunication on the original purpose of the interview in the first instance, and a difference in editorial license in the second. Doǧan Sabanci’s paper, which has opposed Erdogan at times, faces pressure from the government to tone down its negative opinions.

Other questions brought up fake news, the first amendment rights of Facebook and Google, and the role of humor in Muslim media after Charlie Hebdo. The final audience statement came from another “moderate Muslim,” who found that “it’s not my job to constantly communicate that I’m not dangerous.” “You’re free to think that way,” responded Doǧan Sabanci. “I’m going to be responsible.”

The nicest stock portrait via Wikimedia Commons

Click to show comments

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Turkey must be broke up into three units, Anatolia, Phrygria and the Kurds. The Kurds speak Aramaic. The Yazidis and Druze and Parsis should get a Zoroastrian state. In this way Israel will be protected by non-mussulmanic bufffer states. Syria and Iraq must likewise be broken up and a Free Christian Assyria be reestablished. Let the Palestinians be part of a larger Sunni Hassemite state. 1919 was a fraud.

  • Radical Columbia Student says:

    @Radical Columbia Student What’s a moderate muslim? Good job writer on putting that in quotes. What a stupid category…well I suppose it isn’t stupid but in fact, very well expresses power. No one goes around saying that “I’m a moderate Western” in order to distance themselves from violent, colonial, aggressive, and indiscriminate Western imperialism and state terrorism. They do not speak like that because Western violence abroad is “legitimate” and official. But muslims have to say we are “moderate muslims” because ‘muslim terrorists’ are not state actors , are not official, and are extremely weak. Hence we can never escape the reality of world politics. It’s high time the muzlims take over and switch the hierarchy up for a little while isn’t it? Am i right??

  • Ad

    Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    WHY WOULD YOU PUT NUDES AS YOUR BACKROUND, you will get in trouble in like 0.02 seconds, this is (read more)
    How To Impress Your Class Crush On Zoom
    October 31, 2020
    You really expect me to put a nude as my bg in class??????????????? WHAT KIND OF- (read more)
    How To Impress Your Class Crush On Zoom
    October 30, 2020
    Oh goodness This happened to me today but worse becuse my friend scream out "ooouuu you farted!!!" ahh it (read more)
    How To Recover From Farting On Zoom: A Step-By-Step Guide
    October 30, 2020
    I need to know what kind of bread you have. Please. (read more)
    Dress Up As Alma (And Other Statues) For Halloween
    October 29, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel
    • COVID-19 misinformation