Connect with us

All Articles

Did Columbia Football Deserve Its Dartmouth Win?

As Columbia football players celebrate, one in the foreground holds up a baseball bat while he sticks out his tongue.

Defensive Lineman Alexander Holme is trying out for the baseball team.

It’s a common fallacy of sports journalism to rest an entire game on a single play. In a 60 minute (or 3 hour) game of football, a point scored on the opening play matters just as much to the final score as a point as the clock expires. If a last-second touchdown is a team’s last chance, then they had dozens of other chances beforehand.

In that sense, it’s not right to focus only on the final play of the Columbia Football team’s (6-0, 3-0 Ivy) victory over Dartmouth (5-1, 2-1 Ivy). The final play wouldn’t have mattered had Columbia not racked up four 3-and-outs during the last half, or had quarterback Anders Hill not lobbed the ball into triple coverage when the Lions had a chance to close out the game with ten minutes left in the fourth quarter. Similarly, Dartmouth could have made the last play irrelevant by converting their third down attempts (0 for 9 on the day), or by making a chip shot field goal at the end of the first half. And, per head coach Al Bagnoli, Dartmouth would have been stopped earlier were it not for an illegal block below the waist call made during that fateful final drive.

With all of those disclaimers in mind, the end of the Dartmouth game was an absolute mess.

The game’s fourth quarter played out like a nightmare where the Lions were running through molasses, which made Dartmouth’s victory appear nearly inevitable. After the aforementioned interception in the Dartmouth endzone, the Big Green took only seven plays and under three minutes to score a touchdown, as the Lions failed to stop the run and the pass alike. The drive ended when Columbia attempted a massive blitz on first down, leaving an open Drew Estrada on the left side to receive a 38-yard touchdown pass. The Lions then went three-and-out, giving a red-hot Dartmouth team the ball with 5:18 left on the clock, with the score at 22-17 Columbia. The Big Green once again wasted no time, quickly reaching the Columbia 6-yard line on six plays. While the Lions did put up a formidable goal-line stand, they were also aided by 20 yards worth of Dartmouth penalties. On 4th-and-goal from the 27, Dartmouth failed to convert. The Lions once again went three-and-out, and the Big Green, for a third straight time, plowed through the middle of the gridiron without an ounce of resistance.

After running roughshod over the Lions for 15 whole football minutes, Dartmouth seemed posed to score with 17 seconds left on the clock at the Columbia 7-yard line. Mike Hinton rushed with a host of Columbia defenders and sacked Dartmouth quarterback Jack Heneghan for a ten-yard loss. The referees proceeded to play an animated game of hot potato for the remaining eternity of twelve to fourteen seconds. After Dartmouth handed the ball to the officials, they bobbled it towards the Dartmouth endzone. Once they retrieved it, they placed the ball at the wrong yardline. By the time the both the ball and the referees were in position, there was not a second left on the clock. Dartmouth’s red-hot offense was neutralized not by the defense, but by the officials.

Would Dartmouth have won without official intervention? Per ESPN, the Big Green had only a 14% chance of winning after the final sack. But at the game, the offense seemed unstoppable. The Big Green would have had to make an astonishing play, after already pulling off a series of last-minute victories during their last few weeks of football. It felt more than possible. So while Columbia’s win was hard-fought, it would be naive to ignore the messy end to another episode in the Lions’ undefeated streak.

The bat of truth via Gregory Fisher

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous It’s true that Columbia really fell apart in the last quarter, but their phenomenal performance in the first half more than made up for it. So yes, they deserved the win.

  • Richard Forzani says:

    @Richard Forzani Nice take on the game, but it doesn’t play.
    For the bulk of the game, Columbia dominated in points and statistics.
    In the last 10 minutes, a gutsy comeback by Dartmouth brought them close. BUT………this was contingent on a series of very fortunate plays and questionable penalty calls against CU. Luck like this does not usually last indeterminately. And unfortunately for Dartmouth, it ran out.

    Remember, both squads have pulled out several last minute wins this season. The main thing was that CU earned the win throughout the game, and held on at the end.

  • Ad

    Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    the article literally explains the situation i dont understand why people are tripping so hard in the comments (read more)
    Spec Editors Halt Publication, Allegedly Over Lack Of Staff Constitution
    October 1, 2020
    The virus isn't deadly for college-aged kids. Well that's not true. It's deadly less than .005% of the time with (read more)
    Steps To Keeping And Maintaining Friends On Campus In the Middle Of A Pandemic
    October 1, 2020
    "Because of fire management techniques that were imported from Europe during the colonial era, forests in North America are now (read more)
    Understanding The Causes And Implications Of Wildfires On The West Coast: A Lecture On Climate Crisis
    October 1, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel
    • COVID-19 misinformation