Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

Barnard And Columbia Faculty Received Racist Robocalls Following Murder Of Tess Majors

Just over two weeks after the murder of Tess Majors, Barnard and Columbia faculty members have received racist robocalls on their landlines.

According to a statement published by the Columbia Office of University Life, several Barnard and Columbia faculty members have received racist voicemails to their landlines. The university and Mayor de Blasio denounce the messages put out in the robocalls. The university will be working closely with the NYPD to block the numbers that these voicemails are coming from.

The university asks if you have received one of these voicemails or receive one in the future to contact Public Safety.

These voicemails seem to be in line with a larger upswell of racism in the days following Majors’ murder, as a Connecticut man was arrested last week after posting racist threats online in connection to the murder.

Bwog has reached out to Barnard regarding these voicemails and will update when we hear back.

Update 12/29 7:50 PM: Bwog received an email sent to all Barnard faculty and staff sent on December 25th. The email confirms that the robocalls were sent by a white supremacist group. The email can be found below:

Dear Barnard Faculty and Staff,

A few hours ago we became aware that robocalls from a white supremacist group left a racist voicemail on landlines across campus. The contents of this message, related to Tess Majors’ recent death, are abhorrent and viciously offensive. We write to let you know that we are actively looking into this matter with the NYPD and are working to block the caller. Hateful and threatening rhetoric will not be tolerated. We encourage you to report any additional issues directly to either of us. We take this attack on our values extremely seriously and will work diligently to combat such messages in the future.

Sincerely,

Amy Zavadil, Interim Executive Director for Public Safety, azavadil@barnard.edu

Roger Mosier, Interim Vice President for Operations, rmosier@barnard.edu

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

3 Comments

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Very sad that the NYPD put more effort into finding the source of “racist” threats online than finding Tessa’s killer. It’s almost as if racist thought crime is worse than actual crime these days.

    10
    3
  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Bill DeBlasio denounced “racist” robocalls faster than he denounced Tessa’s killers. Imagine that.

    11
    4
  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Are the racist threats anti white?

  • Have Your Say

    What should you actually Venmo people for?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Popular This Week

    Sorry. No data so far.

    Recent Comments

    What a racist and reactionary comments section. Ignoring the real concerns of those advocating for restorative justice is a bad (read more)
    Concerns Over Tess Majors Investigation Grow As New Developments Emerge
    January 16, 2020
    Fabulously wealthy college students... (read more)
    e’s Bar Has Closed
    January 16, 2020
    Restorative justice is just the "woke" thing to say. None of these kids have any idea what they're talking (read more)
    Concerns Over Tess Majors Investigation Grow As New Developments Emerge
    January 11, 2020
    Yeah. It is all city money and property and infrastructure. New York should be doing the same for its (read more)
    The Aftermath: Columbia’s Relationship With The Greater Harlem Community
    January 11, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel