At promptly 3 pm at the Graduate School of Journalism, Sig Gissler,
administrator of the Pulitzer Prizes, announced the 2006 winners. By
announced, I mean that press kits that had a list of winners and other
information about them were made available to those present. And by those
present, I mean approximately ten journalists and a dozen other people
affiliated with the school. All of the journalists then proceeded to open
their cell phones and read the winners to their respective news
organizations. Overheard: “Yes, you were a finalist in Public Service.
Bye.” “You’ve never heard of Mike Luckovich? I don’t know what rock you
live under.”
Since 1917, Pulitzer Prize jurors for each category
have nominated three selections to be considered by the board, which then votes on two finalists and a winner. Gissler described the
process as “often complicated,” as it is possible to override the jury¹s
rejection of any submission with a 3/4 vote by the board. Such was the
special case this year, as the board awarded the New Orleans Times-Picayune in the Public Service and Breaking News categories for coverage of Hurricane Katrina although those pieces had not made it through the first round of judging. Also apparent this year was the absence of a Drama Award, as the board did not find majority support for any one of the plays nominated.
Amid much criticism of the news media, Gissler said the winners this year are “heartening-examples of high-quality journalism.” He noted the watchdog function of some of the winning pieces, including the Washington Post‘s reporting of the Abrahamoff Abramoff scandal and the New York Times’ exploration of domestic wiretapping. Gissler also noted the inclusion of online journalism (ostensibly the local Katrina coverage) into the selection process, and pointed out the somewhat rare “Special Citation” awards given to the historian Edmund S. Morgan (American Slavery, American Freedom) and
posthumously to Thelonius Monk. “The board feels [these awards] are fully
deserved for lifetime achievement,” he said.
Update: 2006 Pulitzer Prize Winners
Jessica Cohen
9 Comments
@the copy editor you should have If you’re going to have a holier-than-thou attitude about being one of the select few to show up for the Pulitzers, at least get your national news figures straight.
I don’t know who “Abrahamoff” is—but there was a Pulitzer given for reporting on one Jack Abramoff.
@dude news is not bwog’s strong suit, copy editor. bwog, stick to free food announcements. the details of reporting actual news (like getting names right) is tricky.
@Bitter Spec Douches Are at it again. Bwog schooled them hard with that SHOCC interview. Good thing the Spec’s always got its facts (http://www.columbiaspectator.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/02/09/43eaef7bb496f)
and names (http://bwog.net/index.php?page=post&article_id=431)
right.
@for the record I’m “dude,” and I’m not on spec. I’m an equal-opportunity hater.
@There's been a mistake! Where’s Bwog’s prize? Three cheers for the only source of worthwhile and timely campus news. Huzzah!
@yo Bwog You missed a scoop. There was something crazy going down in front of Miller Theater around 8 PM.
@Anna Corke Actually we didn’t miss it. Check out the May issue for the whole story.
@sd do you have a full list of the winners?
@IMD Just added a link to the winners.