Bwog football correspondent CML reports on the Lions’ dismal loss to Penn, of all places.
This last Saturday, among the verdant foliage, obtrusive infrastructure, and thoughtless mélange of architectural styles that defines
The game started on an auspicious note for the Lions, who received the kickoff flawlessly and proceeded to obtain two first downs in quick succession. But the usually moribund offense soon found itself facing a fourth down situation on the Penn 34-yard line – too close to the end-zone to punt, and too far to kick a field goal with significant chance of success. The Quakers’ defense stuffed the conversion attempt, and the Penn offense took over. The Lions’ defense held, but after the offense busted out what has become its signature move – the three-and-out – the Quakers were able to advance up the field far enough to kick a field goal, putting the score at 3-0.
This three-point deficit essentially put the game out of the reach of the Lions’ offense, which proved to be the personification of Oscar Wilde’s aesthetic ideal: somewhat pretty to look at, but completely useless. Of course, the Columbia Peacock Feathers strived to score, even coming close a couple of times, but all these endeavors ended in failure. An artistic field-goal attempt in the second quarter was brusquely blocked by the Philadelphian Philistines, while the Columbia Blue China’s four attempts from the four-yard line to ram the hard, long ball through a gaping wide hole in the opposing defense and into the end-zone were summarily denied by the Pennsylvanian Anti-Sodomy Statutes. To blow one opportunity like that may be regarded as a misfortune; to blow both looks like carelessness.
As time expired in the fourth quarter, with Penn up 16-0 from two additional touchdowns (one of which had a missed PAT),
It was a fitting and tragic end to this Picture of Offensive Incompetence.
9 Comments
@CML Of course, the problem is they don’t!
@CML #5: awesome.
@whoah who wrote the 3rd paragraph? its caustic, lurid, and funny. has our CML joined the ranks of embittered columbia fans resigned to expecting an annual rite of futility instead of an actual season?
or is he just turning into a Fed writer?
@To Be Fair To be fair, that is much cleverer and less single-joked than something by a Fed writer
@Ernest The Lions don’t play accurately – anyone can play accurately – but they play with wonderful expression.
@poop no we have a good kicker hes a sohpmore and usually gets the ivy league speacial team player of the week award
@CML Though sports analysis isn’t really my province (I write these things from a layman’s perspective), I’m fairly certain we don’t have a good kicker. A 44-yard field goal attempt is certainly stretching it, especially given that his other attempt was blocked.
-CML
@rp no the 34 yard line is pretty much kicking territory. they were stupid to go for it on 4th down especially that early in the game. that is unless our kicker is horrible/hurt/we dont have a good kicker
@DHI 34 yard line is a 51 yard field goal (add 7 for the snap, 10 for the end line), which doesn’t require a “horrible” kicker to expect a miss especially, by college standards. Kickers who can reliably hit 50+ aren’t all that common even in the NFL. Adam Vinateiri, the famed New England Patriots kicker and among the best in the NFL is 8-for-17 career on 50+ kicks, less than 50%.
I thought we did have a fairly good kicker, or did he graduate?