Connect with us

All Articles

Kick ’em while they’re down: the CC 2010 Debate

pictureLast night, a sizable and enthusiastic crowd gathered in JJ’s Place to see the three parties running for 2010 Class Council debate (and eat free chicken fingers). While Mark Modesitt’s reconstituted Alma Matters [Remix] Party has the advantage of incumbency, the other two parties, AJ Pascua’s Go Party and Maximo Cubilette’s TOGA Party, seemed to possess far more energy – and focused that energy on ways to improve upon Modesitt’s policies.

There’s not a lot of original stuff you can say as a serious student council candidate – everyone hit on increasing aid to study abroad programs – but debates are the time to make as many promises as possible, and they did not disappoint. Modesitt’s ticket (dressed, inexplicably, in somber black) focused on “class cohesiveness” and proposed a class email highlighting the achievements of class members, while Cubilette’s party suggested further off-campus programming and dinners with constituents at local restaurants, and Pascua’s promised to move back the CC Add/Drop deadline and throw another Winter Wonderland-esque party (Go VP candidate Sue Yang claimed responsibility for the success of the first-year formal).

For probably the first time ever, each party had a green plank in their platform. Modesitt promised to focus on environmental concerns in a second term, going so far as to question other parties as to their plans to reduce Columbia’s “anthropogenic effects” on the environment. The sitting president recommended awareness – “turning off lights when you leave the room” – in his opening statement, which TOGA largely echoed, while the Go Party (dressed in green!) suggested campus-wide dorm room inspections over winter break to ensure windows were closed and appliances unplugged.

Having covered saving the planet, candidates moved on to social justice. An audience question about Manhattanville prompted Modesitt and Cubilette to side with Team Columbia. “The area needs a lot of development; there aren’t a lot of residents who actually live there, only about 400 residents,” said Cubilette, a New York resident. Go Party Representative candidate Claytoya Tugwell struck a tone of compromise: “We are totally against gentrification or bullying, but we do believe in Columbia expanding experience for Columbia students.”

Issues aside, Go and TOGA couldn’t resist swarming the ailing incumbent. Go Party charged Modesitt (the only member of Alma Matters currently on Class Council) – with failing to make good on his pledge to cooperate with 2010’s grandfather class to open up internships (he claimed he had followed the terms of his promise, which was to provide networking opportunities for 2010 class members). The TOGA Party asked Modesitt why he has not “implemented the changes that would fix the inefficiencies [he had] noted.” Modesitt claimed success on all ideas in his previous campaign’s platform.

Unlike the notably vocal Go party, Alma Matters [Remix] didn’t celebrate after any of their speaking opportunities. Still, there was no clear victor in the debate – two elections insiders were overheard whispering, “The parties are pretty evenly matched in terms of support.” Go Party and TOGA both seemed to come out ahead, but Modesitt has had experience pulling out surprise victories.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • sooo says:

    @sooo why does 2010 suck so much?

  • Student Government says:

    @Student Government IS Incredibly Lame.

  • i love says:

    @i love claytoya tugwell. so much. :)

    1. i agree says:

      @i agree she is my boo.

  • HEY HEY!@ says:

    @HEY HEY!@ Cool photo!

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous SUCKS?
    The Student Government. It’s lame and there is 5% productivity coming from them.

    Claytoya is way too much for it.

  • yea rite says:

    @yea rite sue yang is so full of shit. she didn’t do anything except stand around and act like a fucking cheerleader.

  • let's be honest says:

    @let's be honest TOGA was the msot impressive and I definitely think Valerie should be my class rep… for many reasons…


    @POPULARITY CONTEXT come on people. Just say it. P-O-P-U-L-A-R-I-T-Y W-I-N-S.

    And Claytoya Tugwell has the most whiny annoying voice i’ve heard in my life.

  • Cubilette says:

    @Cubilette wouldn’t understand the first thing to Manhattanville, being an upper-class gentrified new yorker. He’s even worse off than non-natives.

    1. Kidding, right? says:

      @Kidding, right? What are you talking about upper-class gentrified new yorker? So much for passing judgements without knowing someone. He is one of the most down-to-earth and socio-economically conscious individuals I know.

  • Inspections? says:

    @Inspections? Sue Yang thinks the student body would enjoy inspection?

  • actually says:

    @actually last time I checked Jessica is on class council… get your facts straight bwog

  • DPD says:

    @DPD She is on Class Council, but not as an elected member. Only Mark was elected last fall. Should have been more clear.

    1. What's says:

      @What's with all the mud-slinging? No one ever has anything constructive to say.

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    It's clear from all the hysterical comments that Barnard girls aren't getting any in lockdown. (read more)
    Racist Messages In FIJI GroupMe Surface, Involved Members Asked To Disaffiliate
    June 3, 2020
    Maybe you haven't noticed but the criminal justice system has been absolutely failing to deliver justice--particularly to women who have (read more)
    Racist Messages In FIJI GroupMe Surface, Involved Members Asked To Disaffiliate
    June 3, 2020
    You have to be an idiot to believe recruiters have any say in the hiring process. They're administrators who set (read more)
    Racist Messages In FIJI GroupMe Surface, Involved Members Asked To Disaffiliate
    June 3, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel