Connect with us

All Articles

Lions Mauled By Bears

Columbia men’s basketball came into this evening’s game against Cornell with high hopes—after all, some sports prognosticators and portents had picked the Lions in the preseason as league champions, and opening league play with a hard-fought six-point loss at Ithaca against Cornell, there seemed to be no reason that the senior-studded lineup couldn’t better their performance at home in the veritable high-school gym that is Levien.

A win would mean a respectable 1-1 record with twelve ostensibly easier league games to go; a loss would consign Columbia to the cellar of the Ivy League, with a pitiful record of 0-2 and prospects for a league championship dim for not just one but probably several years. So how did the Lions respond to what may have been the biggest basketball game in years? In a word, poorly. Cornell came out of the gate strong by scoring ten unanswered; Columbia’s clunky offense failed to score until more than six minutes had elapsed.

Given the Lions’ slow, methodical, halfcourt-oriented mode of scoring points, an early-game deficit is always bad, and an early-game deficit against a superior team even worse. Easy interior points were impossible against Cornell’s corn-fed frontcourt, and on the rare occasions when the drives drew fouls, horrible free-throw shooting ensured that the deficit remained as huge as ever. Meanwhile, the defense, which forced a number of turnovers, would play solidly and smotheringly for the first fifteen or so second of every possession before breaking down at the most inopportune of times and surrendering an unfortunate trifecta or layup off the glass.

Impassioned cheers from the student section were squelched whenever Cornell scored a basket, which was frequent: every exchange seemed to result in either a preservation or a widening of the deficit, and by halftime, the score was Cornell 40, Columbia 22. Like in the non-conference home opener against Fordham, the Lions were able to recover their poise during the second half, but it was already too late: Cornell simply answered every Columbia basket with a basket of their own—Columbia never came within less than a dozen points—and in doing so cruised to an easy victory, far easier than their effort at home a week earlier.

The referees, at times complacent and at others fickle, failed to help either side, the accurate three-point shooting of the Lions capitulated to the relentless interior attack of the Bears, and the game grew ever more out of reach as time elapsed and expired. In the end, Columbia succumbed to what Camus might have called “the indifference of the universe,” lost the game by a score of 72-54, and forfeited the better part of their chances for a share of the league title and an NCAA tournament berth. The general agreement was that it’s not fair to have a state school in the Ivy League, which is, after all, no more than an athletic conference. But with twelve games left against mostly inferior opposition in a league with a lot of parity, we can still hope, right?

– Christopher Morris-Lent

The grisly details can be viewed here

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • What about says:

    @What about the women’s game?

  • Hey Bwog says:

    @Hey Bwog Suharto’s dead. :-(

    1. Uhh says:

      @Uhh and you’re sad because?

  • Did anyone see... says:

    @Did anyone see... …that movie where Tom Cruise gets eaten by a bear?

  • well says:

    @well This was a bit of an overblown analysis. Cornell is the pre-season favorite to win the league, so splitting with Cornell would’ve been a big deal in terms of vying for the title, assuming we don’t drop the ball against the rest of the league.

    On the other hand, Penn and Yale are supposed to be very good this year as well. It’s entirely possible that Cornell will lose 2 games over the course of the conference schedule. But that means we still have to run the table for a tie. I don’t know if there’s a league tie-breaker rule, but I’d assume we’d lose on head-to-head play :(

    Assuming our team gets back on its feet and sweeps next weekend, this should still be a good season of exciting basketball. I mean, the billboard advertising Columbia Basketball on the Westside Highway says so!

    1. really? says:

      @really? there is a billboard advertising columbia basketball on the westside highway? bwog…a picture please!

  • writing? says:

    @writing? If one game is the difference between a respectable record and the cellar, I think it’s clear that too few games have been played to tell anything.

  • Dbag writer says:

    @Dbag writer A pitiful record of 0-2? Or a pitiful observation by someone who fails to recognize there is a 14-game league schedule? And Columbia did not lose to Brown as your headline suggests.

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Popular This Week

    Sorry. No data so far.

    Recent Comments

    Thanks for writing this! Definitely enjoyed the easy reading part and loved the art! (read more)
    Bwog Book Club: W.I.T.C.H. (The Graphic Novel Series)
    May 23, 2020
    TRULY GREAT TIPS BWOG 🦁❤️🦁❤️🎈 (read more)
    Open Letter To Our Professors: Zoom Do’s And Don’ts
    May 22, 2020
    I thought she was a great CC prof. (read more)
    Happy Grad Students: Part One in a One Part Series
    May 20, 2020
    I disagree, she was my TA and she was awesome! Really helpful with reading rough drafts of papers, and a (read more)
    Happy Grad Students: Part One in a One Part Series
    May 20, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel