Connect with us

All Articles

Lecture Hop: Veritas Forum

Bwog Lecture Hop editor Pierce Stanley observes as religion is reconciled with just about everything, for once.

Coming on the heels of a Super Duper Tuesday that saw former Arkansas governor turned evangelical preacher Mike Huckabee decisively win five Republican primaries in the South and the recent dropping out of Republican contender Mitt Romney—a figure previously under the heavy scrutiny of the public eye for his devout Mormonism—the intersection of religion and politics has never been more apparent than in the current election cycle.

Yesterday’s nationwide Veritas Forum proved to be a well-timed and informative event for the throngs that showed up in Roone to flesh out the tensions between religion and politics. Washington Post columnist Dale Hanson Bourke led Columbia professors Andrew Delbanco (director of the American Studies program) and Religion and Humanities professor Mark Lilla, as well as the Senior Pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church Timothy Keller in a discussion about the tensions between religion and pluralism.

The always dapper and bespectacled Lilla, author of The Stillborn God, kicked off the night by arguing that society faces a continuous struggle of trying to reconcile different spheres into an integrated whole that he termed pluralism. Moreover, Lilla suggested that exclusive religion was very simply orthodox religion, in which someone has very comprehensive views about what God, life, reality, and the world are that they are unable to reconcile with others.

The discussion quickly moved to the presidential campaigns and the question of whether candidates are going too far in their use of religion to win votes. Lilla suggested that a balance needs to be kept between religious rhetoric and politics. Delbanco, his usual wry spunk in place, chimed in by wondering if politics are even more humane because of religion. “I think not,” the American Studies professor suggested. 

When the discussion of the political exterior was exhausted, the speakers tackled a more nuanced discussion of the internal later in the night as they tossed around questions of conversion and evangelism. While many entered the evening believing that Delbanco and Lilla would clash heartily with Pastor Keller on the more technical issues of Christianity, the men seemed to agree about most of the topics they discussed. Delbanco even suggested that he is an evangelist to some extent in the classroom, arguing that the fervor to which he puts forth his ideas in the classroom and professes his faith about certain ideas that he believes to be true is in a sense an “evangelic transaction.” Keller agreed that evangelism is a two way street. He criticized Christians that he believed to be unwilling to accept other viewpoints and “exhibit enough humility to think in someone else’s shoes.”

The Veritas Forum provided for brief a moment some keen insights into the role of exclusive religion in a pluralistic society while commenting deeply on the nature of American democracy. More importantly however, last night’s event showed that the debate over the role of religion in politics will be something we will have to confront for years to come. 

Click to show comments

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • What the hell...? says:

    @What the hell...? So far as I can tell, pushing bad science and trying to convince people that Christianity is compelling are two different things.

    1. Mi mi mi mi says:

      @Mi mi mi mi Not to the cool kids.

  • yeah says:

    @yeah great event; deserves more publicity/attention (although roone was pretty packed)

  • ... says:

    @... i didn’t make it, but from what i can tell, these guys are kinda like a watered down on-campus version of the discovery institute…

    1. well says:

      @well i think that is the point of the veritas forum, but at columbia you actually get some serious speakers from both sides, and some serious debates, disagreements, as well as compromise.

      so yes, the point of veritas is evangelization, but given the stellar credentials of those in anti-theological camps at columbia, you generally get very balanced and interesting debates.

      1. Yes says:

        @Yes Scientists are given prominent roles in these debates, including anti-religion ones, so it ends up being a fair examination. Wish it had been publicized better though.

  • yes says:

    @yes this event was fantastic and thought-provoking. very civil, even when they did disagree.

  • Ad

    Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    didn't know I needed this until now, thank you <3 (read more)
    LNB: Lin-Manuel Miranda At Columbia
    October 20, 2020
    yung nuggies you are my late night homie to bop and vibe with (read more)
    A Conversation With SoundCloud Rapper Yung Nugget
    October 19, 2020
    Wow. Who would have thought that someone who made a song about hecking someone then running away like lightning mcqueen, (read more)
    A Conversation With SoundCloud Rapper Yung Nugget
    October 19, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel
    • COVID-19 misinformation