WordPress database error: [Got error 28 from storage engine]
SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON t.term_id = tt.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag', 'post_format') AND tr.object_id IN (8305) ORDER BY t.name ASC

Bwog » LectureHop: Uighur Leader Rebiya Kadeer

WordPress database error: [Got error 28 from storage engine]
SELECT t.*, tt.* FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON t.term_id = tt.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (8305) ORDER BY t.name ASC

Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu

LectureHop: Uighur Leader Rebiya Kadeer


Rebiya Kadeer, leader of the World Uighur Congress, has attracted plenty of international attention since the Chinese government accused her of orchestrating the Urumqui riots of July. Despite strict security measures, experienced Bwog contributor Mark Hay managed to get close enough to hear last night’s lecture, sponsored by CIRCA in 309 Havemeyer.

Rebiya Kadeer is no Dalai Lama. She is a brilliant woman, a staunch defender of her native Uighur culture, and an internationally significant figure. But until this year she enjoyed only a modicum of the symbolic power afforded certain Tibetan leaders with comparable relationships to the Chinese government. It is evident that accusations of her involvement in the July riots in Urumqi (in the remote Uighur region of China) still cling to her. Precautions taken for her lecture were perhaps more than necessary;  public safety was our in force and entrance was refused to anyone not on the pre-approved CIRCA guest list.

As a result, the attendance was lower than one might expect. The sparse numbers, the ample CIRCA personel standing around, and the muffled voice of her translator gave Ms. Kadeer an almost surreal aura as she spoke in her native Uighur tongue. The moment Ms. Kadeer opened her mouth there was a great commotion from the back of the room as three guards swarmed a young man trying to unveil a banner. He was removed from the event with relative ease and a few light swears. Stoic, Kadeer showed no reaction. Nor did she appear to notice to the small cabal of Chinese students in the back of the hall holding hastily-printed signs reading: “Rebiya Kadeer is a Terrorist.” Per capita, it was an overdose of intrigue, but Kadeer and most audience members seemed resolved to ignore every strange element of the night.

Despite their efforts, Kadeer’s reputation and controversy outshone the content of her speech. It seemed that everyone in the room already knew the basic history of the Uighur nation, or at least the similar story of Tibet. The Chinese government claims authority over both small, resource-rich lands with drastically different cultures from the Chinese majority. The Chinese, seeking to develop the areas, have sent ethnic Chinese populations to settle in both places, crowding the natives. Eventually the government imposed laws that favored the ethnic Chinese and diluted the culture of the native group by shipping off youth to become isolated minorities in mainland China’s factory towns. As Kadeer told the story of the Uighur and the Tibetans in an even tone, Bwog realized that it is a story so well known today that its power to move an audience has sadly diminished.

As Kadeer explained the plight of the Uighur it became apparent that her approach differs from the Dalai Lama (to whom she has been compared) in one vital way. She is an unequivocal nationalist, whereas he is a world citizen. Where His Holiness communicates in terms and stories appropriate to his audience and grasps the variety of audiences and situations, Ms. Kadeer lives in the realm of martyrdom. In her world, the Chinese government has initiated every evil and the Uighur are completely peaceful and innocent people, incapable of participating in the terrorist activities the Chinese accuse them of. In her world, an Uighur can do no harm. As such, she refuses to admit the real possibility the some Uighur initiated violence in parts of Urumqi, or that some of her people are involved in terrorist organizations. But the Chinese are capable of every exploitation, every foul misdeed known to man.

Her vision is, of course, no more measured than the picture the Chinese have painted of Ms. Kadeer – one of a rabid separatist, Islamo-fascist extremist bent on devouring the corpses of Chinese children. Both Kadeer and her Chinese nationalist enemies demonize each other past the point of human recognition and compassion. But despite the war of words, Bwog finds it hard to ignore the various third party evidence that support the Uighur claims of oppression. It is a shame that, for whatever reason, so many seats were empty in 309 Havemeyer last night.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

11 Comments

  • Thank you Bwog says:

    @Thank you Bwog For a good summary of the event. Just for clarification, the student who was removed by Public Safety had burst into the room after Ms. Kadeer had started speaking, and was not registered for the event. Therefore he was not removed because he was trying to unfurl a banner, but rather because he had rushed past the Public Safety Guards into the room without approval.

    1. actually... says:

      @actually... he didn’t rush past security. rather he sneaked in through the back entrance of the room.

  • wow says:

    @wow either a miserable failure by security or a sad lack of publicity?? that place should have been packed

    1. The former says:

      @The former Many people had to be turned away at the door for security reasons.

  • I thought says:

    @I thought that Ms. Kadeer was an incredibly passionate, engaging and moving speaker. She made clear that Xinjiang’s case is very different in to Tibet’s in respect to land distribution and education. She also made clear that while Tibet has been in the international spotlight for a long time, Xinjiang hasn’t, and deserves to be. It is sad if the writer of this article could not appreciate the quality of her message or the immediacy of her cause.

    1. bullocks! says:

      @bullocks! The article was great (despite the “our” /”out” typo), presented a pretty good summary of the situation. If the Chinese government demonizes Kadeer, and Kadeer demonizes China, then the Chinese people, regardless of their involvement in their government, may be natually offended by her sensationalist actions. Therefore, the individual who was escorted out of the auditorium (he was trying to unfurl a Chinese flag) could be viewed as the oppressed one here, just as people who tried to wave Tibetan flags along the Olympic Torch route were taken away by security. This irony may be lost on Kadeer, however, as she seems ignorant of her hypocrisy.

  • ... says:

    @... hot event. CIRCA rocks!

  • The protester says:

    @The protester who was taken out, I repeat, was taken out because he was not authorized to be in the room. Sorry, but that’s not “oppression.” Especially when there were people in the back holding banners saying “Rebiya Kadeer is a Terrorist” who were not removed.
    CIRCA specifically chose to do nothing about that because those people were registered for the event. In fact the president of CIRCA called on one of the Chinese protesters to ask a question. Again, hardly oppression.

    The student who was escorted out was escorted out because he did not have approval to be in the room. Public Safety approached him and asked for his ID. He physically resisted them and yelled an obscenity. Public Safety was therefore acting completely according to protocol.

  • Laughable! says:

    @Laughable! is what it is to call the ethnic Han Chinese majority repressed!

  • ..... says:

    @..... Bwog, the student removed was not unfurling a banner or anything of the sort, this is unnecessary and untrue gossip, shoddy reporting, please change your article. He came in through the wrong entrance, without anyone’s permission, he was not on the list so Public safety followed protocol.

    In terms of turn out, CIRCA wanted to fill the room, but security insisted on containing the event to 100 guests who had registered beforehand for security management purposes.

  • I was says:

    @I was a little surprised by but very much appreciative of this report’s objectivity, and I’m sure I’m not the only one. Thank you, Bwog.

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Popular This Week

    WordPress database error: [Got error 28 from storage engine]
    SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_options`

    WordPress database error: [Got error 28 from storage engine]
    SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_options`

    WordPress database error: [Got error 28 from storage engine]
    SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_options`

    WordPress database error: [Got error 28 from storage engine]
    SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_options`

    1. Class Of 2024 Regular Decision Results Have Been Released
    2. How To Recreate Columbia Culture From Home
    3. What To Listen To, Read, And Watch If You Miss New York
    4. Cooking With Bwog: Fettuccine Alfredo
    5. Housing Reviews 2020: Carlton Arms

    Recent Comments

    I would recommend CUNY professor William Helmreich's "The New York Nobody Knows." It's a great work of urban sociology (read more)
    What To Listen To, Read, And Watch If You Miss New York
    March 31, 2020
    how did the group name 'beta fish fight club' not make this list (read more)
    March Madness: Housing Edition
    March 30, 2020
    Every Ivy had a decline in applications. There are fewer high school seniors every year as well as fewer international (read more)
    Class Of 2024 Regular Decision Results Have Been Released
    March 30, 2020
    This answered so many questions for me. Thank you. (read more)
    In Defense of Calling The Milstein Center “Millie”
    March 30, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel