Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

CCSC 2010: The Naked Party

Bwog presents the first installment of today’s series of interviews of the competing tickets for the upcoming CCSC elections on Tuesday. The Naked Party, comprised of Eugenio Suarez, Opal Hoyt, Laura Gabriele, Beezly Kiernan, and Stephanie Wilhelm, are campaigning for the executive board based on ‘accessibility, transparency and accountability, as well as innovation.’ Check back with us the rest of the day as we interview the other CCSC parties.

How would you evaluate the job done by the current student council, especially the current executive board?

Eugenio: Sue Yang has had a lot of great ideas, and all of them are on the table, but she has not had the time nor the resources to see all of them through.

Beezly: She’s done a fabulous job, and we want to continue her legacy. She has done wonders for the image of student council, and developed ties with the administration. I think we now need to be more assertive with the administration.

Stephanie: Sue Yang has done a really great job of making the administration understand what we want, but the administration needs to understand why they should take our opinion into consideration. They’ve also done a really great job with the CCSC cafés, getting people to come and say what they think.

Eugenio: Our rationality has been heard, but not the emotion that is motivating it, and why we matter… There’s only so far you can push, but there are different ways of pushing, different angles you can approach from.In light of the struggles over the academic calendar, gender neutral housing, and other issues, what sort of relationship do you envision for your exec board with the Columbia administration?

Beezly: We do need to be more assertive. We need to come to the table with specific demands. We need to do a better job at communicating how students really feel.

Opal: There’s a difference between telling them what we want and showing them why our opinion matters.

Eugenio: We want to reclaim the student council from the administration.

What campus life events do you plan on holding next year?

Opal: Right now I’m working with CU Records. People do so many amazing things but they are all isolated events. We need to create an atmosphere that says, this is why you need to come to our campus. I’d really like to increase our off-campus relations. We need to make other people come to see Columbia. We want school spirit to be more incorporated with the city in general. We want to make it more possible to have outdoor events. It’s really hard to create awareness when everything is inside.

Laura: We are working to make CU Travels happen. Our aim is to provide subsidized trips for students to get off campus and outside the city. It would also foster school spirit to travel in groups and get perspective on places off campus and out of New York.

Besides issues that are already being discussed by this year’s council (smoking ban, gender neutral housing, etc.), what would be your board’s top new policy priority?

Eugenio: Our priorities are based on what’s most feasible. The Core Lounge would be great and we feel it is extremely important to have a communal space. However in terms of feasibility that would be extremely difficult, so that’s a long-term goal. I think the fundamental problem is the lack of information that’s flowing between the students and the administration.

Opal: Not one of the bullet points on our ticket stands above the rest, but the most important goal is to increase communication. Any parts of any of our projects that we can make happen, and that also increase communication, they’re the top priority.

Beezly: You can focus on one policy really hard, but if the administration bars it, then it bars it.

Laura: One strength of our platform is that we’re not thinking just about a one-year life-span of one governing council. These are projects that we want to initiate, and even if they don’t come to fruition while we’re here, we want to get them rolling and hope that future councils want to continue them.

What experiences do each of your ticket members bring to the CCSC executive board?

Eugenio: I was a representative and then Treasurer for the Student Governing Board, I’ve also worked for the Office of Public Affairs and Communications.

Opal: Right now I’m the vice-president of CU Records, and I also work for the CU Arts Initiative

Stephanie: I’ve been involved with student council for the past three years. I’m also the president of the Economics Society, and the vice-president of the Finance of the Ivy Council.

Laura: Despite being a CC student I’ve served on ESC for two years, and the Student Life Committee for one. I’m also the Vice President of the French Cultural Society.

Beezly: This past year I was secretary of SGB and treasurer of the Campus Life Committee for CCSC.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

22 Comments

  • All they did was repeat themselves says:

    @All they did was repeat themselves I don’t want to see these people naked.

  • article needs says:

    @article needs a copyeditor. bad.

  • Me says:

    @Me This article sucks! Bwog get a new editor!

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous too much nakedness

  • Claire says:

    @Claire I apologize. There were some glaring grammatical errors in this post, due to lack of editing – this is not a reflection on the candidates!

  • Beezly Kiernan says:

    @Beezly Kiernan Point of clarification: I don’t think I ever said “You can focus on one policy really hard, but if the administration bars it, then it bars it.”

    When the administration says no to a policy proposal, like the study days proposal made by this year’s councils, we won’t give up. We will continue to push the administration using all means at our disposal to ensure that student concerns are recognized. We won’t back down next year, not after three years of being frustrated by a non-responsive administration–we’re too damn angry.

    I don’t remember my exact words, but my point was simply that some policy proposals take a long time for the administration to approve, and in the meantime you can focus on other issues without abandoning the big ones. We’ll make sure we get open housing, we’ll defend fall break, but we’ll pursue many other policy initiatives in the meantime.

  • Harmony Hunter says:

    @Harmony Hunter seriously, what’s going to be done about this problem?

    personalized walking tours? clearly labeled maps? personal GPS devices?

  • Bill Clinton says:

    @Bill Clinton “There’s only so far you can push, but there are different ways of pushing, different angles you can approach from”

    I SUPPORT THIS MESSAGE.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous lol.

  • woo says:

    @woo Stephanie naked! lol if I vote for you guys, can we get more free food and study breaks? That would be awesome. Chuck in some brownies too.

  • you guys says:

    @you guys need to step it up…renew cu is kickin’ it!

    1. renewcu says:

      @renewcu should probably cheat less.
      coughcoughAHEM, we commoners see u2 isaac

  • yay! says:

    @yay! the naked party has my vote
    beezly is too awesome

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous So your platform is: “SHOW THEM HOW EXCITED WE ARE AND WE WIN”?

    Kinda weak. Also, their website decries the exclusivity and elitism of school politics, and yet under the “about me” of one of the representatives is the exact phrase — after a series of nauseating phrases, mind you — “I’m elitist.” Seems a bit off.

  • GO NAKED says:

    @GO NAKED finally some candidates who seem to be actually passionate about this school

    1. or says:

      @or passionate about sex. awesome.

      1. GO NAKED says:

        @GO NAKED both work for me :]
        sex and politics????? HAWT

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Not only is their campaign incredibly stupid, its also vulgar and pointless. I don’t think any sane person who cares even a little bit about Columbia would ‘vote naked’.

    1. Dear Anonymous, says:

      @Dear Anonymous, as a seas-er who will not be able to vote but hopes you see SOME sense, I’d like to point out that the naked-ers’ platform is incredibly feasible, reflects passion for the school and isn’t shallow like some of the other candidates who claim they’ll make columbia a better place. i respect the naked party for… what did they state in one of their articles? “taking a chance”!
      naked party, you have my (non-existent) vote!!!!

      1. AGREED! says:

        @AGREED! I like where the naked party is going with this campaign! new faces on ccsc? YES PLEASE!!!!! youve got my vote guys keep it up!!!!

  • person says:

    @person I spot a bra in the bottom left. In my opinion, Naked Party has lost all credibility.

  • My Money says:

    @My Money is on third place.

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    how did the group name 'beta fish fight club' not make this list (read more)
    March Madness: Housing Edition
    March 30, 2020
    Every Ivy had a decline in applications. There are fewer high school seniors every year as well as fewer international (read more)
    Class Of 2024 Regular Decision Results Have Been Released
    March 30, 2020
    This answered so many questions for me. Thank you. (read more)
    In Defense of Calling The Milstein Center “Millie”
    March 30, 2020
    I’ll never forget when King Princess in the middle school we went to together made fun of me for having (read more)
    What To Listen To, Read, And Watch If You Miss New York
    March 29, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel