Connect with us

All Articles

JSchool to Obama: Don’t Prosecute WikiLeaks

A good chunk of the Columbia JSchool faculty has signed a letter to Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder claiming that the recent publication of diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks is “protected by the First Amendment.” The faculty looks back a few decades and points out that “as a historical matter, government overreaction to publication of leaked material in the press has always been more damaging to American democracy than the leaks themselves.” Letter after the jump.

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500

Attorney General Eric Holder
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

December 13, 2010

Dear Mr. President and General Holder:
As faculty members and officers of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, we are concerned by recent reports that the Department of Justice is considering criminal charges against Julian Assange or others associated with Wikileaks.

Journalists have a responsibility to exercise careful news judgment when classified documents are involved, including assessing whether a document is legitimately confidential and whether there may be harm from its publication.

But while we hold varying opinions of Wikileaks’ methods and decisions, we all believe that in publishing diplomatic cables Wikileaks is engaging in journalistic activity protected by the First Amendment. Any prosecution of Wikileaks’ staff for receiving, possessing or publishing classified materials will set a dangerous precedent for reporters in any publication or medium, potentially chilling investigative journalism and other First Amendment-protected activity.

As a historical matter, government overreaction to publication of leaked material in the press has always been more damaging to American democracy than the leaks themselves.

The U.S. and the First Amendment continue to set a world standard for freedom of the press, encouraging journalists in many nations to take significant risks on behalf of transparency. Prosecution in the Wikileaks case would greatly damage American standing in free-press debates worldwide and would dishearten those journalists looking to this nation for inspiration.

We urge you to pursue a course of prudent restraint in the Wikileaks matter.
Please note this letter reflects our individual views, not a position of Columbia University or the Journalism School.


Emily Bell, Professor of Professional Practice; Director, Tow Center for Digital Journalism

Helen Benedict, Professor

Sheila Coronel, Toni Stabile Professor of Professional Practice in Investigative;
Director, Toni Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism

June Cross, Associate Professor of Journalism

John Dinges, Godfrey Lowell Cabot Professor of Journalism

Joshua Friedman, Director, Maria Moors Cabot Prize for Journalism in the Americas

Todd Gitlin, Professor; Chair, Ph.D. Program

Ari Goldman, Professor

LynNell Hancock, Professor; Director, Spencer Education Journalism Fellowship

Marguerite Holloway, Assistant Professor; Director, Science and Environmental Journalism

David Klatell, Professor of Professional Practice; Chair, International Studies

Nicolas Lemann, Dean; Henry R. Luce Professor

Dale Maharidge, Associate Professor

Arlene Morgan, Associate Dean, Prizes and Programs

Victor S. Navasky, George T. Delacorte Professor in Magazine Journalism; Director,
Delacorte Center for Magazine Journalism

Michael Schudson, Professor

Bruce Shapiro, Executive Director, Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma

Alisa Solomon, Associate Professor; Director, Arts Concentration, M.A. Program
Paula Span, Adjunct Professor

Duy Linh Tu, Assistant Professor of Professional Practice; Coordinator, Digital Media Program

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Fuck says:

    @Fuck Julian Assange

  • honestly says:

    @honestly Does anyone even care what’s going on in Journalism (the building) anymore? It’s pretty clear all the school does nowadays is provide a tired reaction to the actual innovators in the hopes that someone will actually still believe in their relevance.

    1. umm says:

      @umm yes and no. Do people care about the publication of traditional media and reporting models? probably not because our modernity is all but obliterating the way we get “stuff”. Do the principles of proper journalism and the history of truth and spin matter? yes, probably more than ever given what’s happened in the last century or two. how do you manage your the inputs to your beliefs and perceptions in the world? is it is a world that gives you too much of the same view, not enough of the different stuff, and far too little of the most intriguing and novel?

  • The name says:

    @The name “Julian Assange” makes me think of “Pascal Sauvage,” a character from the ever-hilarious film, Johnny English (starring Rowan Atkinson). Sauvage is an evil mastermind. Coincidence??? I think not.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous You’re an idiot. It would only be a coincidence if “Sauvage” had any real connection to the name “Assange.” If the only coincidence you can see there is that they’re both French words, then congratulations, you’re a dumbass and should go back to studying.

      1. Lighten up says:

        @Lighten up There’s a half-rhyme there, as well.

      2. A ha ha! says:

        @A ha ha! My good sir or madam! Though French-sounding, “Assange” is not actually a French surname. So congratulations to YOU!

  • Punish Assange says:

    @Punish Assange The government isn’t even going after reporters for reporting on Wikileaks. What a sanctimonious defense of naked self-interest. Wikileaks is a bonanza for media careerists, who don’t care about the actual harm caused by Wikileaks except how it can be used to further themselves.

    1. Hells yeah says:

      @Hells yeah Bring back the guillotine!

      1. Funny you says:

        @Funny you should say that, since our head-chopping enemies will benefit most from the damage that Wikileaks causes us. There’s a real war going on out there, and what weakens us makes our enemies stronger. We can lose, you know.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Yay for the JSchool, press freedom, and transparency in government and diplomatic affairs!

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous That’s definitely Eliza Schapiro’s dad right there….

    1. Eliza says:

      @Eliza Nope! That’s not my dad’s name. Also, that’s not how you spell my name. Try again!

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    It's clear from all the hysterical comments that Barnard girls aren't getting any in lockdown. (read more)
    Racist Messages In FIJI GroupMe Surface, Involved Members Asked To Disaffiliate
    June 3, 2020
    Maybe you haven't noticed but the criminal justice system has been absolutely failing to deliver justice--particularly to women who have (read more)
    Racist Messages In FIJI GroupMe Surface, Involved Members Asked To Disaffiliate
    June 3, 2020
    You have to be an idiot to believe recruiters have any say in the hiring process. They're administrators who set (read more)
    Racist Messages In FIJI GroupMe Surface, Involved Members Asked To Disaffiliate
    June 3, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel