Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

Bwoglines: Lack of Transparency Edition

The Man just doesn't want you to find out the truth

Turns out Bank of America’s $5 monthly debit fee was actually an attempt to be more transparent, but consumer outrage killed the surcharge before it reached fruition. (Atlantic)

The Murdochs, no strangers to lying to the public, could be in more trouble as new legal documents suggest that News Corp paid off victims once they realized their position was “perilous.” (Reuters)

After numerous visits from Jordanian Royalty, PrezBo returns the favor, visiting the Queen of Jordan to discuss “[Columbia University Middle East Research Center]’s strategy and programmes for the upcoming year and their accomplishments to date.” (Petra)

China is funding “Confucius Institutes” at various universities across the country, including Columbia. The catch: if you want the money, you have to avoid touchy topics like Taiwan, Tibet, and the like. (Businessweek)

More controversy over the Manhattanville expansion plans as the $150 million given to the West Harlemt Local Development Fund has not been properly distributed and lacks transparency, coming under fire from local politicians. (Spec, DNAinfo)

Not the world’s most transparent document via Wikimedia Commons

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 
Ad

Have Your Say

What should Bwog's new tagline be?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Comments

I made that post hoping more people would look into this situation, but never could I have expected an article (read more)
Spec Editors Halt Publication, Allegedly Over Lack Of Staff Constitution
October 1, 2020
my section head has been totally transparent w/ us about the reason for the strike, and none of my friends (read more)
Spec Editors Halt Publication, Allegedly Over Lack Of Staff Constitution
October 1, 2020

Comment Policy

The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
  • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
  • Hate speech
  • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
  • Personal information about an individual
  • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
  • Spam or self-promotion
  • Copyright infringement
  • Libel
  • COVID-19 misinformation