Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
Articles

Prezbo Reacts to Supreme Court Sort Of Upholding Affirmative Action

PrezBo doesn't look at cameras.

He looks great, whether chilling at Baker or responding to Supreme Court decisions .

Yesterday, the Supreme Court sort of upheld race-based affirmative action. In the case of Fisher v. Texas, in which a white girl named Abigail Fisher sued the University of Texas for not admitting her and practicing race-based affirmative action, a lower court ruled in favor of the University.

Many Supreme Court watchers expected the conservative justices on the Supreme Court would overturn the lower court’s decision and rule that affirmative action was unconstitutional. Instead, the Court ruled 7-1 (with 1 abstention) that the case should be reargued in the lower court. Basically, the Court dodged the question of whether race-based affirmative action is constitutional.

So the press turned to the next best authority on affirmative action: Prezbo, who was involved in two landmark affirmative action case back in 2002, when he was president of the University of Michigan. In those cases, Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court basically ruled that it was OK for schools to consider race in admissions, as long as they didn’t set racial quotas or say that being black was equal to a certain number of SAT points. The Court also insisted, as they had in an earlier case called Bakke v. University of California, that race could only be used for the purpose of having a diverse class, not to correct for historical discrimination against minorities.

Bwog asked Prezbo for comment and he sent us this exclusive statement (emphasis ours):

For American colleges and universities, today’s Supreme Court ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas is most significant for its reaffirmation of the educational value in preserving our decades-old ability to assemble racially and culturally diverse student bodies that advance our mission. At Columbia, we take great pride in an undergraduate student body with as high a percentage of low- and moderate-income students as any of our peer institutions and the largest number of military veterans, as well as the highest percentage of African American students among the nation’s top 30 universities. Over and over, our students tell us that they come for the intellectual excitement produced by the various kinds of diversity on our campus. In fact, when I addressed Columbia’s class of 2013 at last month’s commencement, the loudest applause from the graduates came in response to my suggestion that encountering the diversity of their talented classmates was the most influential part of their experience on campus.

To be sure, the Court has insisted on strict scrutiny of how we achieve these valuable goals. But as decades pass from the Civil Rights era defined by the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision, we should be mindful that that we don’t lose a vital sense of connection to the larger social issues that animate these policies and constitutional principles. As scholars and citizens we must understand both our history and the continuing reality of a society that has struggled with racial equality. Our great system of higher education is just one among our public and private institutions and businesses in embracing the importance of diversity in our country.

Prezbo also talked to lesser other media outlets. He wrote an op-ed for The New York Times and was interviewed by Huffington Post reporter (and Barnard alum) Joy Resmovits.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

12 Comments

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous The decision did not uphold affirmative action at all. It states that universities have the burden to prove that diversity is beneficial, and that they must use all race neutral ways to create a diverse class first, and use race as a last resort to create that diversity. They punted back to the lower court because they felt the lower court did not test the University of Texas’ process of diversity sufficiently to determine whether they had committed discrimination or not.

    1. Peter says:

      @Peter Many people thought the Court would overturn the Fifth Circuit decision and overrule Bakke and Grutter. They didn’t. Hence “sort of upholding.”

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous blow me

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous thank god. fuck prezbo and fuck reverse racism.

  • What did says:

    @What did Justice Scalia say to the Columbia track team during his visit to NYC?

    Why does it always have to be about race?

    1. Clarification. says:

      @Clarification. I’m on my phone responding to this. I fat-fingered it and accidentally gave you a thumbs up when you’re joke deserved two thumbs down.

      Have a good day.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous socioeconomic affirmative action for the win. who gives a shit about the pigment of your skin? that way, poor blacks and hispanics – and not exters / del bartons / horace manns – benefit. it makes everything more fair.

  • Bwog! says:

    @Bwog! You’re back! *clings*

    Don’t ever leave me again.

  • @devis demenagement france Amazing content, thanks for talking about this information.
    Amazing to know that this subject is being successfully effectively properly secured also in this web page.

  • Alum says:

    @Alum “Prezbo, who was involved in two landmark affirmative action case back in 2002, when he was president of the University of Michigan”

    Those cases were heard and decided by the Supreme Court in 2003, after Bollinger had become Columbia’s president.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous that girl on the right is cute.

  • MLK says:

    @MLK I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

  • Have Your Say

    Most exhausting walk on campus?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Favorite Comments

    SGA is too emotional (read more)
    SGA Gets Destroyed By Facts And Logic From DAD
    March 26, 2019
    can you smoke weed in watt (read more)
    Housing Reviews 2018: Watt
    March 26, 2019

    Recent Comments

    SGA is too emotional (read more)
    SGA Gets Destroyed By Facts And Logic From DAD
    March 26, 2019
    can you smoke weed in watt (read more)
    Housing Reviews 2018: Watt
    March 26, 2019
    https://barnard.edu/reslife/housing-options/andersen (read more)
    Barnard Housing Mystique: The Lottery, Explained
    March 26, 2019