Connect with us

All Articles

Go To The Varsity Show: Bwog Reviews Almageddon



Our Arts Editor brings you Bwog’s review of The 121st Varsity Show, as well as some thoughts of his own.

V121 opens on ambitious RA and plucky heroine Gwen Ross (Gabrielle Bullard, BC ’18) returning from a semester spent abroad. She is anxious to return to her Columbia home, and we, the audience, look forward to joining her in our own return to the upbeat escapism of the Varsity Show.

The curtains open on the show, and we are led into hell.

Columbia has devolved into a battleground of angry factions. The Football Players for Social Justice literally battle the Columbia University Radical Misogynists for meeting space. Roaree’s head is brandished on a pike. Alma is soon decapitated herself.

Our peppy Gwen Ross sees opportunity in the chaos—the chance to personally bring Columbia back together. However, the administration, and the delightfully dastardly Suzanne Goldberg (Skylar Gottlieb, BC ’16), have a plan of their own: send disgruntled students elsewhere using a technologically advanced magic box, to be replaced by eager transfers.

Writers Alexandra Horn (BC ’16) and Bijan Samareh (CC ’15) make use of these fantastical elements, but wisely do not allow them to define their show. Instead, having established this hellscape, they let it serve as a backdrop, focusing their attention on the lives of their characters, and not just on the ways their world is changed. For the most part, this world actually looks remarkably like our own Columbia. Students are worn down by stress and the constant rejection of ill-conceived romantic advances. In an energetic musical number they debate passionately, then righteously, in an Introduction to Women and Gender Studies course, and can’t help but let growing disdain develop into confused attraction (“Love’s More Fun”). These students are irritated by pseudo-intellectual post-hookup pillow talk but find comfort in nights of real intimacy spent with their friends. And when they are woken up by the birth control alarm the next morning, they seriously consider raising a baby (or selling it) for the chance to sleep in. All of these minor references in the show touch on Columbia students’ realities, drawing a clear parallel between our world and the world of the show, hellish though it may seem.

The ensemble achieves this realism while still managing to characterize it with humor. Rapidly switching between roles, its members bring a sense of individuality to the characters they portray while still working together and playing off of each other. It is a challenge to identify any clear stand out members, not because there were no exceptional performers, but because the uniform distribution of talent. My personal favorite was Varun Kumar (SEAS ’16), for his range of expressions and pitch perfect line readings (“We are the Trusteeeeeees”), but yours might just as easily be April Cho (CC ’17) for her impression of a Dartmouth transfer, or Sophie Laruelle (CC ’17) for her satire of CUMB’s ‘revolutionary’ humor.

For most of the show, the two leads feel like a part of this ensemble, just two more characters appearing to make a point or a joke, standing apart only at rare moments to drive the plot forward. This is not to say they don’t play their parts well. Bullard captures the subtlety of her character, slowly revealing a pragmatic idealist who must overcome her pride and thoughtlessness to realize her goals (impressive even before considering that she is only a first-year student). As her anarchist romantic counterpart, Arrow, Isaac Calvin (CC ’17) walks the fine line between charmingly obnoxious and obnoxiously charming.

The finishing touch on this well crafted reality is the versatile score, composed jointly by Sam Balzac (CC ’17) and Fernanda Douglas (CC ’16). Highlighting a villainous monologue with the brassy notes of old Broadway in one scene, it easily transitions into something more sweet and sentimental during a moment shared between friends and to something bordering on rock opera during a call for societal destruction. At its most memorable, the score takes the urgent pitches of a late night news bulletin, introducing just an echo of “Roar Lion Roar” before the frequently revisited chorus of “WAKE UP COLUMBIA: WHAT ARE YOU FIGHTING FOR?”

Horn and Samareh apply this score, this talented cast, and this well developed world to confront  a range of problems faced by the student body. From its start, V121 explores issues relating to conflict and wellness. Not one, but two songs—“Senior Night” and “Morningside High”—explore substance abuse, and its role as a coping mechanism for isolation, helplessness, and depression. Megan Litt (BC ’17) as Karen Phillips gracefully carries an important subplot devoted to those students struggling to afford their time here. The issue of sexual assault is frequently alluded to, if not discussed directly, in an absurd administrative mishandling of clear human rights violations.

The show places the greatest blame on the administration, but not by reducing it to the cartoon villainy of past Varsity Shows. Gottlieb brings enthusiasm and electric stage presence to her Suzanne Goldberg, and Michael McKay (CC ’15) wins the hearts of the audience as Scott Helfrich, Goldberg’s second in command, but while these characters both contribute to the villainy of the plot, neither is found to be at the root of it. Nor can the scuttling Trustees, for all their staunch conservatism and undisguised self-interest. In the end the administration that permits and perpetuates so much harm is discovered to be nothing but bureaucratic loyalty, pride in long job titles, and misplaced faith, all held together by the judicious application of red tape.

This same critical outlook is brought to the nature of activism, which is here not, as in years passed, reduced to a metaphor for togetherness, but described as a frustrating and constantly shifting compromise between the idealistic pursuit of radical change and the practical need to work within the existing corrupt systems. The relationship between Gwen and Arrow is, more than a love story, a conversation between two very different theories of change and conceptions of privilege.

These ideas easily overcome the few structural issues of the show. Pacing, in particular, seems like it could have been kept tighter, though with this material it is easy to understand the desire to include as much as possible. Sound quality was wildly inconsistent, but will almost certainly be addressed in the coming shows. Eugene, a stale nerd stereotype not only isn’t very funny, but doesn’t really fit into the plot, despite a valiant effort by Asher Varon (JTS/GS ’18).

The only issue that actually threatens the show’s success comes in its second act. Without giving too much away, the show moves away from realism into a more traditional Varsity Show realm. Our heroes band together against the forces of darkness. They plumb depths never meant to be ventured. And, most crucially, though not altogether successful, they claim victory.

In grappling with so many problems facing our community, V121 puts itself in the difficult position of finding some solution for them.  The script does take on issues at Columbia that have not been resolved yet, so the challenge the writers create for themselves is coming up with a satisfying fantasy ending for the story of our own campus. I consider the terms of the victory they eventually arrive at interestingly subversive and true-to life. They might also be construed as a last minute whitewash over questions that deserve more thought.

There is no question that this is an ambitious show. Nor can it be denied that it is a clever one, a funny one, and at many points, a successful one. It will be debated however, how well V121 eventually addresses those problems it chooses to acknowledge. I admit, there is some disagreement about this point on our staff. For example, the racial diversity in the V121 cast should not be overlooked given the almost all-white ensembles of past shows, but what V121 makes up for in racial representation lacks in regards to sexuality. Almost all of the relationships in the show are heteronormative, which is a bit disappointing given the blatant possibility of a love connection between two female characters.

Ultimately though, it is our predominant opinion that the message of this show is not just acceptable, but powerful. In dropping Columbia into hell, and then believably showing life going on pretty much as it is, Almageddon makes a strong case that hell might not be so far off from where we already are, that our school faces significant problems, and that these problems continue to be addressed poorly, to the real harm of the student body. It makes the equally strong case that even in these dark times there are moments of intimacy and camaraderie, that we can overcome our differences, and that together we can heal our community, fractured today, but not broken.

We at Bwog believe in this message, and are proud to recommend V121: Almageddon. V121 will present a show tonight at 8 PM and two shows on Sunday at 2 PM and 8 PM.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous “Almost all of the relationships in the show are heteronormative, which is a bit disappointing given the blatant possibility of a love connection between two female characters.”
    Are you serious?

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous There’s literally one romantic relationship in the show lol

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous The Varsity Show was great if you like lighting design that looks like it was done by a blind man, audio technicians who seem deaf, spotlight operators who must be drunk, stagehands running actors over with props mid scene, and unrehearsed musical numbers. On the up side, the cast was great.

    3. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Really. Don’t be a heterophobe.

  • the end? says:

    @the end? I like the idea of nonresolution in the ending, but the almost cheesy ending monologue? I’m sure writing this isn’t easy, but this felt like kinda lazy. I do want to end this by saying V121 was awesome regardless!!!


  • ally horn says:

    @ally horn is actually the coolest

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous umm Cole was amazing

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous yea he a beast

  • anon says:

    @anon Saturday’s sound quality was absolutely awful. Whoever had the job should be fired and should never work in the industry again. Couldn’t hear like 20% of the lines because of their shitty job

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous OMG. Have you ever seen a show in Roone before? Sound in there is ridiculously bad always. This one sounded comparatively good.

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous No. I was sitting right behind the sound guy. He was just forgetting to turn the mics on. I could see when he would realize he forgot and watch his hand turn it on. It had nothing to do with the room.

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous This also happened Friday – entire lines weren’t amplified

  • makes some good points but says:

    @makes some good points but the show’s not as perfect as you make it out. the show manages to marginalize nearly everyone on this campus, who is not in the “mainstream radicalism.” it skewers conservatives, anyone with money (the Board of Trustees by the way is not as white or republican as this show superficially portrays), those who like ORGO night, it sends the message that no one should ever transfer, etc.

    it attacks both the administration AND the student body. we’re nowhere close to hell on this campus. granted we have issues to work out. but for this review to say we’re close to hell is absurd.

    the show literally tells us, the student body, to “Wake Up: Do you know what you’re fighting for?” as if we’ve been asleep this whole time. The show needs to get off its high horse. It does not know best.

    1. wut says:

      @wut lol it’s the varsity show. it’s supposed to exaggerate and satirize everything…that’s literally it’s only job. “the show needs to get off its high horse. it does not know best”–of course “it” doesn’t. “it” is the VARSITY SHOW, not fox news. LOL CONSERVATIVES.

    2. so basically says:

      @so basically “this show was not tailored to the tastes of people who are happy and comfortable with the way things are now, which I find upsetting because usually everything goes my way”

  • @A fan of this year's show This is the most talented cast that the Varsity Show has ever seen (yes, sorry V120, this cast is more talented … as is majority of this year’s creative team, but that’s a discussion for another day). Congratulations to everyone involved.

    But, more importantly, not enough attention has been given to Skylar Gottlieb in her portrayal of Suzanne Goldberg. Her final number in Act II was akin to watching a master-class in acting. In 20 years, we’ll all be saying that we saw the Tony-winning Miss Gottlieb in her first, major starring role, right here on the Columbia stage.

    1. k says:

      @k u clearly didn’t see V118 that had such a better main cast

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Also she’s previously played Mama Rose in Gypsy and this role seemed to channel a lot of the same qualities.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous First time seeing the show as a junior and I was highly impressed! Well done everyone! Made me proud to be a columbian again

  • "but not by reducing [the administration] to the cartoon villainy of past Varsity Shows" says:

    @"but not by reducing [the administration] to the cartoon villainy of past Varsity Shows" PREZBO WAS A BABY

    A *BABY*

  • it was okay says:

    @it was okay This is the weirdest review. It’s like a CC class post.

    The show was three hours long, first of all. I was getting really tired of everything by the end of it, and so was the rest of the audience; even the laughs started flagging by the end. The book is hilarious, but nothing makes sense. The plot was so hard to follow I had no idea what was going on and I just didn’t care. All the jokes were amazing though, and everything pointed at the administration was top notch.

    Nothing about the set? BWog, shut up.

  • 6.5/10 says:

    @6.5/10 Better than V119, worse than V118 and V120.

    Lead villain was phenomenal, as was Scott.

    Lead character was… ok.

    Male lead (hippie dude) was subpar.

    It all felt a little bit disjointed.

    Loved the senior night bit. By far the best part.

    Jokes were largely on point but A) It wasn’t nearly as subversive as it ought to have been. There were no jokes that made everyone gasp, or feel uncomfortable. It was all just incredibly PG, which is kind of dull. B) The jokes tailed off significantly in the second act. It was actually pretty boring.

    Well done though. By and large I enjoyed it.

  • Student Leader says:

    @Student Leader That representation of Goldberg was SPOT ON.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Paulina was awesome!

  • Disappointing says:

    @Disappointing Skylar Gottlieb was by far the best part. The rest was merely eh.

    1. I liked the show says:

      @I liked the show overall, but Sklyar Gottlieb was fantastic. She has a legit future in the comedy world.

      (And I don’t know her. Never heard of her until last night.)

  • what annoyed me says:

    @what annoyed me Stop feeding St. A’s ago. Although honestly McKay, who’s in the frat, did a really good job.

  • Have Your Say

    What should our staffer name her pet raccoon?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    this is the greatest header image that has and ever will exist (read more)
    Swinging With Bwog: A Power Ranking Of Riverside Park Swing Sets
    October 17, 2019
    I am a Barnard alum and a professional writer. This piece is reaching for...what? BC turns out a lot (read more)
    Pretending To Be A Barnard Student For A Week
    October 16, 2019
    i am appalled. disgusted. revolted? math is certainly red. and history is certainly purple. (read more)
    Eat Your Way Through The Core!
    October 16, 2019
    I love shareblue talking points! There is nothing missing from the transcript. What you are repeating is a conspiracy theory (read more)
    More Egregious Than Watergate: A Guide To The Recent Impeachment Scandal
    October 16, 2019

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel