Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

Late Night Check-In With CDCJ

This evening, Managing Editor Maddie Stearn had the opportunity to interview Lucas Zeppetello, SEAS ’16, one of the Columbia Divest for Climate Justice (CDCJ) protesters currently inside of Low Library. The interview was somewhat difficult to orchestrate (think Rapunzel), but the results were interesting to say the least. [Note: we usually reserve Late Night Bwog posts for our more obscure content, but this update on CDCJ’s Weekend at Bollinger’s seems well-suited to a Late Night post.] 

When I checked in with the CDCJ protesters outside of Low, they had just “escorted” Suzanne Goldberg, Executive Vice President for University Life, to her cab. The CDCJ members outside were letting their comrades inside the building know that they had found Goldberg, spoken to her, and seen her off. I say “found” because the CDCJ members inside the Rotunda were unsure if she had left the building and could not locate her for some time.

During her visit to Low, Goldberg distributed letters to each of the 9 students conducting the sit-in. The letters were actually just printed versions of an email she had sent earlier to those same students. She also printed copies of the Rules of Conduct for each person. The irony of the wasted paper was not lost on the CDCJ members.

After Goldberg’s departure, CDCJ members yelled up to one of Low’s windows (which was not actually low to the ground), promising a delivery of pancakes in the morning to their fellow CDCJ-ers inside. The students inside were thankful, and asked only that dairy products not be included (they currently have an excess of dairy, but no refrigeration).

After the protesters outside left to store their signs for the night, Daniella Lapidous facilitated an interview between myself and Lucas Zeppetello. He and I spoke (yelled) to each other through a window roughly 12-feet off the ground and that only opened a few inches. It worked out surprisingly well.

We made it work

We made it work

 

Despite the breakdown in talks between the protesters and administrators, there was no lack of drama inside Low library today. Zeppetello spoke about a particular incident that resulted in the protesters’ expulsion from Prezbo’s office, which they had previously occupied for several hours.

According to Zeppetello, protesters were assured that if they went into Low Rotunda to speak with Peter Cerneka about their next steps, they would be able to go back into the President’s office. However, after the last person left Prezbo’s office, Public Safety immediately locked all doors leading into the office.

A new debate thus ensued over the protesters’ ability to retrieve their belongings still locked in Prezbo’s office. Zeppetello told me that, at first, Public Safety said that officers would retrieve the belongings only if the Spectator reporters did not record the process. Zepetello said that he and the other CDCJ members inside became concerned about the lack of transparency this implied. The CDCJ-ers pushed back against this proposal until Public Safety agreed to allow Spectator record the officers’ retrieval of the protesters’ belongings.

Zeppetello also told me that, upon receiving their belongings in bags from Public Safety, one protester discovered that her computer screen had been damaged (it now has a dead spot in the corner). She is confident that the damage occurred during the transfer.

While the argument over the protesters’ belongings may not be directly tied to CDCJ’s demands, the debate over transparency is certainly relevant to CDCJ’s call for the University to divest from fossil fuels.

After my conversation with Zeppetello, I asked Daniela Lapidous whether the sit-in was purposely timed to coincide with Days on Campus. She said that was definitely the aim. CDCJ believes that prospective students deserve to know about the concerns of current students, including the University’s investments in fossil fuels. This sentiment calls to mind No Red Tape’s infamous protest during last year’s Days on Campus. However, as of now CDCJ’s sit-in appears to be less contentious among students than the No Red Tape protest.

When asked if CDCJ has a timeline for their sit-in, Lapidous said that they are prepared to continue the protest indefinitely. She pointed to examples from other schools, including MIT’s 116-day sit-in for divestment. In that case, CDCJ’s Weekend at Bollinger’s could turn into an Extended Vacation at Bollinger’s.

Photo or Diagram? via Maddie Stearn

Click to show comments
3 Comments

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

3 Comments

  • CC2016 says:

    @CC2016 LUCAS YOU ROCK!!!!

  • Van Owen says:

    @Van Owen Too funny. Rookie mistake leaving the president’s office.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous You got this guys!!!!

  • Ad

    Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    AGJFFNNFHVIDVMVOYOUUUUYYYYYYGOGOGINNHYG TGOTOOIOGGJHHKINNHJ AssoppSM DDDDDDDMDMCMSAAASSSCMMFVVNMMMMCMCCKMFRMRMRYOUOUOUUOUYYJJFFFJFFFJFFFFJFJFJFFFFFJFFJFFYYJGGJWWFFGVUFVUFVBHFDJBFFFUJVRUBNFUV JUGJFI BGBGFBFGBFBFFFHHFHFHFHFHFHFHFHGHRHRHBVDJSSJUOYOYOYIUUJNNNNMM,O,MOKMMIOTHHDHFRIFoiytjghnf (read more)
    Butler Archetypes: Dicking Around
    October 26, 2020
    ILL TRY BUT IF THIS DOSENT WORK IM GOING TO BLOCK THIS WEBSITE (read more)
    How To Impress Your Class Crush On Zoom
    October 26, 2020
    Ok so i'm 11 and i'm on my nintendo and i'm really into this boy and i'm see if this (read more)
    How To Impress Your Class Crush On Zoom
    October 25, 2020
    this will go good but not having no pants on is to much but he's gonna love me after (read more)
    How To Impress Your Class Crush On Zoom
    October 25, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel
    • COVID-19 misinformation