Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

Graduate Workers Of Columbia University Vote To Unionize

almaGraduate Workers of Columbia University-UAW has announced that votes are counted and graduate students at Columbia have voted to unionize. This comes after the National Labor Relations Board ruled this summer that graduate students at universities throughout the United States should be able to unionize, overturning a 2004 precedent-setting case involving Brown University.

This year’s case involved specifically Columbia University graduate students, after they pushed for unionization for two years. After the ruling this summer, Columbia University Media Relations Director Caroline Adelman made a statement disagreeing with the NLRB’s decision, stating “While we are reviewing the ruling, Columbia — along with many of our peer institutions — disagrees with this outcome because we believe the academic relationship students have with faculty members and departments as part of their studies is not the same as between employer and employee.” Keep in mind this is the statement regarding this summers allowing of a vote, rather than the newly announced vote outcome to utilize the ruling and unionize at Columbia. However, Columbia has advertised (through promoted social media posts) a website advocating to vote against unionization.

Update 12/9/16 6:00pm: Columbia has released their official statement on the vote in an email from the provost.

Statement from Columbia University’s Provost John Coatsworth:

Since the last week of August, when the NLRB reversed its position and decided that students at private universities may be treated as employees, Columbia’s administration has communicated two principal messages to our University community and to eligible voters: We have always believed that the magnitude of the decision at issue in this election, in combination with Columbia’s values, required an open and respectful conversation that explained the arguments for and against unionization. Having heard those arguments, the research and teaching assistants who voted have chosen to be represented by the United Auto Workers.

Second, as I said in my letter of August 24 to the Columbia community: “Regardless of the outcome of the election, we will continue to ensure that Columbia remains a place where every student can achieve the highest levels of intellectual accomplishment and personal fulfillment.” This sentiment remains as true today as it was then.

Caroline Adelman

Media Relations Director

Office of Communications and Public Affairs

Columbia University

 

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

Have Your Say

What should you actually Venmo people for?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Popular This Week

Sorry. No data so far.

Recent Comments

What a racist and reactionary comments section. Ignoring the real concerns of those advocating for restorative justice is a bad (read more)
Concerns Over Tess Majors Investigation Grow As New Developments Emerge
January 16, 2020
Fabulously wealthy college students... (read more)
e’s Bar Has Closed
January 16, 2020
Restorative justice is just the "woke" thing to say. None of these kids have any idea what they're talking (read more)
Concerns Over Tess Majors Investigation Grow As New Developments Emerge
January 11, 2020
Yeah. It is all city money and property and infrastructure. New York should be doing the same for its (read more)
The Aftermath: Columbia’s Relationship With The Greater Harlem Community
January 11, 2020

Comment Policy

The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
  • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
  • Hate speech
  • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
  • Personal information about an individual
  • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
  • Spam or self-promotion
  • Copyright infringement
  • Libel