Connect with us

All Articles

Bwoglines: Gay Rights Please Edition

Astrophysics, elevators, and some very important Supreme Court cases in today’s Bwoglines!

Happening in the World: This year’s Nobel physics prize has been awarded to three scientists, one for his discoveries about the origin of the universe, specifically involving the use of cosmic microwave background radiation, and the other two for discovering a new planet, the first to be found orbiting a star like the sun. (BBC)

Happening in the US: Today, the Supreme Court will hear three cases involving discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, focusing on whether or not these kinds of discrimination are covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits workplace discrimination based on sex. Should the courts decide Title VII does cover these forms of discrimination, the LGBTQ+ community would receive greater protections at a more local level than before. (NPR)

Happening in NYC: The M.T.A. has pledged $5.5 million to installing new elevators in 70 subway station over the next five years. Currently, only a quarter of subway stops are accessible, a low percentage among major transit systems. Although highly frequented stations have priority, the ultimate goal of this project is for any given passenger to be no further than two stops from an accessible station. (NYT)

Happening on Campus: Columbia professors Helene Foley, Kate Brassel, and Jennifer Rhodes will be giving a lecture on The Bacchae and its politics regarding its adaptations and its place in the classroom. The speakers will be looking into themes of “gender, violence, race, and nationalism,” and the lecture will take place in Diana 504 at 6:30 pm. (event)

A Poem For You: acknowledgements by Danez Smith is maybe the best friendship poem ever and you should read it and cry with your closest pals, as I did when a fellow bwogger showed it to me :’)

Header via Bwog Archives


Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Why is this difficult for people? says:

    @Why is this difficult for people? Nowhere in Title VII is sexual orientation mentioned, and we also know that the legislators never intended for the law to cover sexual orientation. If Congress wants to extend protections to the alphabet crowd, then they need to pass a law. It is not the court’s job to manufacture new legislation. There is no sane or credible argument for extending Title VII by judicial fiat.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous lol looks like the triggered bwog fairies flew to the scene to voice their disapproval for basic legal analysis. Honk Honk

  • Have Your Say

    What should our staffer name her pet raccoon?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    this is the greatest header image that has and ever will exist (read more)
    Swinging With Bwog: A Power Ranking Of Riverside Park Swing Sets
    October 17, 2019
    I am a Barnard alum and a professional writer. This piece is reaching for...what? BC turns out a lot (read more)
    Pretending To Be A Barnard Student For A Week
    October 16, 2019
    i am appalled. disgusted. revolted? math is certainly red. and history is certainly purple. (read more)
    Eat Your Way Through The Core!
    October 16, 2019
    I love shareblue talking points! There is nothing missing from the transcript. What you are repeating is a conspiracy theory (read more)
    More Egregious Than Watergate: A Guide To The Recent Impeachment Scandal
    October 16, 2019

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel