A few issues of Spectator remain to be released, but Speccies celebrated the end of their year Tuesday night in considerable style. For the annual Spec Dinner, our campus broadsheet (whose facebook group, incidentally, has 175 more members than The Blue and White’s) rented out the private rooms of 420, a swanky bar on 80th and Amsterdam. Two open bars dispensed drinks to increasingly loopy journalists, who couldn’t even get through the platters of roasted peppers, pita and hummus, olives, and stuffed grape leaves—rumored to have cost the paper a cool $1,000.
You don’t get paid for pouring your heart and soul into Columbia’s paper of record. But getting royally feted twice a year makes it easier to justify the effort.
66 Comments
@taylor “unbelievable” wasn’t me.
and “no kidding” doesn’t know why i left spec for the blue and white.
@wow this has gotten a bit ridiculous… I’m not sure the spec even changes that much from year to year…
@EIC spec will be dead in the fucking water after SM.
and romoser’s hung like a mouse. don’t lie.
@trainee Hey, Megan is awesome. She’s ever enthusiastic and sweet and never got tired of the annoying questins thrown her waty. Granted I mostly interacted with her as a trainee but I can’t imagine someone could turn off/on that approachability like a lightswitch. Don’t bash her.
@Avi Avi is better looking than Steve. There. I said it. Bye Kate.
@seriously though All personal judgements aside, I’m still not sure what the paper gained under Megan as an EIC, speaking as someone with a little more perspective than the trainees. Although it does take years of work to get the Spec where it’s gotten since the tabloid days so it wasn’t just Nick – and part of that is kick-ass reporting from the likes of Megan Greenwell. I think Spec will miss Megan for sure, but not as an editor.
@wrong I’m a Spec alum who can tell you exactly what the paper gained under Megan. Nobody liked working for Nick, so the quality of the paper was only mediocre. The quality of the writing, reporting, photography, and page design skyrocketed under Megan because she pushed everyone to be better and they responded because they respected her. If Steve’s a good editor it’s because of Megan, and ditto for everyone else who currently holds a position there. Plus, Nick nearly put the paper in financial ruin, and Megan responded by putting $20,000 back in the endowment. The paper was in a bit of turmoil after Nick’s reign, and Megan stabilized the ship like no one else could. She’s the best editor we’ve had in a LONG time.
@unbelievable are you really serious? i wasn’t going to get in this thing, but you are just very wrong here.
quality of photography better? we had a photo editor leave and had zero staff, and now the photo department is still lacking.
quality of page design? SM was the production editor, so i hardly think megan had anything to do with that
and if so many people responded and respected her, how come so many people left spec for B & W? it’s because she ALIENATED them. there’s NO doubt that she herself is a great journalist, but i highly disagree that her editorship was mind-blowing.
@re: unbelievable Hi Taylor! Why didn’t you use the “Bwog staff” tag?
@no kidding who left spec for b&w other than taylor? josie is on both, as is the gaggle of freshman girls, but taylor was the only one who truly switched. if you want to work for a newspaper, work for spec. if you want to work for a magazine, work for b&w (is there really going to be a spec mag?). there doesn’t really have to be any “poaching,” and there hasn’t been. and to say taylor left because megan alienated her is pretty ridiculous.
@It's interesting that people who know the Spec clearly have a lot to say about the past editors– and they’re using the Bwog as a forum. Irony.
@why's that ironic? what other forum is there? bwog is serving a gawker-like niche here.
@speccie they’re all great, so please let’s stop this convo immediately.
@why? let’s let it all out. it’s anonymous, after all.
@yeah telis was hot too. not in an conventional sort of way, but definitely hot.
@agreed steve is fantastic, megan is great too, and nick is really hot. three-for-three.
@is it just me? steve’s pretty hot, too.
@i dont mean …to stifle free speech and all of that, but could we cut out the personal attacks here? I mean, obviously, the most avid readers of bwog are spec staffers, but this is getting a little uncomfortable, i think. i miss the innocence of “I love Steve!”
@re: i dont mean yes! please!
@new poster steve’s awesome
@setting the record straight Steve is awesome cause he’s a humble, hardworking dude.
Megan was a lousy, bitchy editor who completely lost touch with the average staffer during her tenure. (Though to be fair, she’s a great reporter and therefore great training editor).
Steve has a problem with alcohol, and someday someone will propagate a digital picture of kicking and screaming off the CAVA crew while nearly getting arrested in a Santa suit.
@average staffer she didn’t lose touch with me…
@another average staffer I have to agree – I’m one of the lowest members on the Spec totem pole and Megan has never lost touch with me, and in fact has gone out of her way to help me out several times, when she had no reason or cause to do so. I think she was a fantastic asset to the Spectator and will go on to do great things in journalism.
@umm... which one? they all look like initials of the past four eic’s to me…
@i think... he/she probably meant only one is female? yes?
@oldy telis can shoot lasers from his eyes, but nick can rally.
@re: duh hi meg.
@duh again 0 for 1 there, smartypants. Not a bad guess, I admit, but you’ll have to be a bit more creative…Meg, I’m afraid, has better things to do with her time.
@re: duh again see, it’s funny because she’s the outgoing editor of the Spectator. if i started guessing the actual speccies it could be, it’d just be annoying.
@re: duh again in general, i assume all bwog postings are marc, all esc postings are adam goldberg, and all spec postings are meg. and all anti-shocc postings are that Random Racist Guy who keeps saying things that get deleted.
@mat without exception, whenever marc posts (which is fairly frequent), he signs his initials, as seen above.
@duh specmag will render b&w (although perhaps not bwog) totally worthless
@Umm.. Do we really need another Spec product floating around campus? The B&W will sink you.
@someone in uganda i love steve. and steve loves sausage.
@back to the mag spec mag is going to be weekly. so there’s a difference. and it will also have more than two colors. i think this campus is big enough for the both.
@back to steve i’m late, but i wanted to say he’s like, perhaps the best editor in chief the spec has had in a long time. and i say that including HIM (the one and only NS) because steve isn’t self-serving or too personally ambitious to actually help the paper. i just feel bad because steve was basically thrown into the position while spec was going to shit, and he’s the only one who can save it.
@editors SM vs. MG vs. NS vs. TD. Discuss.
@hmm one of these things is not like the other . . .
@well... …they are kind of competing with BW, but it’s not lik SpecMag is up to it.
@yeah if anything delenda est it’s bwogmago
@BWOGREADER SpecMago Delenda Est.
@hmmm how come? it’s not like its competing with bwog.
@explanation There’s just a little crossover in the publications world. Wanna send in something from the softball party? I want to hear about it too.
@right… Why don’t you make a post about every party that goes on around Columbia– or are you guys a little fixated on the Spec?
@and im not sure other parties are that swank — $1000, geez?
@anyway what a fucking amazing photo.
@Give credit where it’s due. Since it probably came off a facebook album, can you tell us who took the photo?
@speccie in the subway That would be one Morgan Sellers. She’s cool.
STEVE RULES!
@sigh Steve’s the best!
@Ah Steve Moncada = Customer Service Intercom
@?? what??
@kyoto ka-re wa sek-shi
@yep steve moncada is amazing.
@aww oh, steve.
@<3 I think all of spec adores him.
@actually i think everyone who has ever met him adores him.
@someone in london i adore him.
@<3 well we knew _that_!
@someone stuck in new york k8, u r such a loser 4 posting that.
@haha You’re such a loser for writing “k8,” “u r,” and “4.”
@spec Yup. I am pretty sure they do. Good thing he is EIC
@Pete Mistretta Steve Moncada, You’re the man