Connect with us


IvyGate’s Hibernation a Thing of the Past

Gather round Columbia, it’s time to re-welcome IvyGate into our browsers and into our hearts. Naturally, it has returned dressed to the nines, with a new WordPress redesign and fresh-faced summer editors. Bwogger Justin Vlasits favors the mouse over chalk-underlines in the new masthead (see above), while a Yalie friend of Bwog noticed that clicking on the chalky names re-directs readers to posts about that school.

Now let’s meet the man and woman behind the summer incarnation of IvyGate 2.0. Why look, it’s hometown favorite Nina Shield (BC ’07), and some rising sophomore from Harvard.  After introducing herself, Shield puts together a nice little wrap-up of all Vag-related happenings. She is the first Columbian to helm the good ship IvyGate since the legendary days of Chris Beam and Nick Summers. (Oh, and Andrew Nusca, a former summer editor, was a J-Schooler.) Go Lions. 

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Hmm says:

    @Hmm Nina Shield as a Columbian? I think you mean Barnardian, or whatever you call a Barnard girl.

    Otherwise, yay Barnard for co-editing a site at which your school is not included in the coverage!

  • what is going on says:

    @what is going on the site design looks the same, and neither of these links work.


  • Alvin Noteworthy says:

    @Alvin Noteworthy What? A bwog post without a Dustin Hoffman picture? This is a first.

  • wait says:

    @wait since when are barnard girls ivy leaguers? and don’t give me some technical bullshit about how they can play in the athletic league.

    1. ... says:

      @... i dunno… i think that girls from barnard are uniquely qualified to be throwing stones at the ivy league house of glass.

      1. True says:

        @True This is the only comment in this whole thread that doesn’t sound like it was posted by a self-conscious Barnard student or a bitter Columbia girl. Can we please get past freshman year?

      2. cc student says:

        @cc student cheers to that

  • Barnard pwns IvyGate says:

    @Barnard pwns IvyGate Go Nina! Barnard is seriously representing on the summer editor front at IvyGate. I’m another Barnard girl who will be taking over at IvyGate in a few weeks. :)

    1. hey you says:

      @hey you stfu Barnard.

  • annoyed says:

    @annoyed bwog has the right spirit of congratulating fellow columbia UNIVERSITY students, and of course every commenter fires back with anti-barnard slander. it doesn’t make you look good, and it’s completely unnecessary. the comments undermine every bwog post.

    1. but says:

      @but since when is congratulating affiliates necessary?

  • shall says:

    @shall i heap on the praises when some uts grad speaks with God?

  • i don't get it says:

    @i don't get it of course we have to claim barnard grads as fellow columbia grads! how else are we to deal with lauren graham?

  • bc'08 says:

    @bc'08 Hmmm…. My diploma seems to have been granted by the Trustees of Columbia University and signed by Lee C. Bollinger as well as Judith Shapiro.

    1. sorry says:

      @sorry you still graduated from barnard. embrace it.

      1. bc'08 says:

        @bc'08 I do. Stop making it sound like Barnard is a 4th tier school.

        1. no no says:

          @no no Not at all. Just a second tier school, that’s all we’re saying.

  • columbia girl says:

    @columbia girl i don’t understand why barnard graduates would have their diploma’s granted by the trustees of CU and be signed by PrezBo if barnard has their own trustees…does anyone know how the sister school relationship works at other ivys?

    I don’t think its a matter of which school is better but as a female at columbia, I feel that there were different qualifications for my acceptance into columbia then barnard so i don’t understand why barnard students would get their diploma granted by the trustees of columbia…

  • this debate says:

    @this debate is so old, so stupid, so not-going-to-change.
    columbia students look petty when they diss barnard. that alone should be enough reason to quit the condescending comments.

    1. we may look petty says:

      @we may look petty but barnard students look far worse when they claim to go to columbia.

  • seriously says:

    @seriously the only people who engage in this debate are the incoming freshman and those who post on boredatbutler.

  • more says:

    @more we want more bwog posts!

  • can i just say says:

    @can i just say our diplomas are so fuckin heinous that my mom thought that we were going to get the real one later.

    ps. sorry for ruining any anticipation in underclassmen for graduation.

    pps. i still don’t have a job… yay

  • barnard what? says:

    @barnard what? Bwog, please check your facts. Last time I checked, Barnard is not part of the Ivy League AT ALL.

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    I would recommend CUNY professor William Helmreich's "The New York Nobody Knows." It's a great work of urban sociology (read more)
    What To Listen To, Read, And Watch If You Miss New York
    March 31, 2020
    how did the group name 'beta fish fight club' not make this list (read more)
    March Madness: Housing Edition
    March 30, 2020
    Every Ivy had a decline in applications. There are fewer high school seniors every year as well as fewer international (read more)
    Class Of 2024 Regular Decision Results Have Been Released
    March 30, 2020
    This answered so many questions for me. Thank you. (read more)
    In Defense of Calling The Milstein Center “Millie”
    March 30, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel