Connect with us

All Articles

SEAS Faculty Expresses Deep Dissatisfaction with Dean Peña-Mora

The leadership of SEAS Dean Feniosky Peña-Mora was brought under intense scrutiny in an article in The New York Times today. The story notes the numerous resignations of department heads since his arrival, citing frustration with his direction. This semester, two letters of no confidence in the Dean—signed by the majority of tenured faculty in SEAS—have been sent to University administrators. The most recent, circulated in October, asserted that “the morale of the faculty and their trust in Dean Peña-Mora are reaching an all-time low,” and that “a quick change in leadership” was needed. The entire letter, while sent to administrators in October, was uploaded to the Times website today. The primary source of dissatisfaction is Peña-Mora’s rapid expansion of the school, whose student body has swelled in size without providing any more space for research, or appropriate increases in faculty. According to the Times:

He arrived at a time when Columbia was determined to raise the profile of its engineering school, which includes bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degree programs. The school had fewer than 1,400 graduate students in 2005, more than 1,900 when the new dean took over, and 2,400 now. The faculty has also grown, but not as fast… Professors say that an effort to reshuffle the available space ignored their input and made matters worse.

More than anything, Peña-Mora was criticized for being unwilling to listen to criticism.

Among professors interviewed, nearly all of whom insisted on anonymity for fear of angering the administration, the most persistent criticism was that Dr. Peña-Mora simply did not listen.

“He’s a control freak, in my opinion,” said Van C. Mow, who said he stepped down as chairman of biomedical engineering because “I got tired of banging my head against the wall.”

Faculty have further suggested that the Dean’s hiring practices favor profits over academic interests. The faculty letter claimed that “candidates with impressive academic records and outstanding recommendations are discounted if their fields do not promise major funding for the school.”

Peña-Mora did not provide much comment, except to say that the culture at Columbia “takes some getting used to.” Interim Provost John Coatsworth conceded that the faculty had “perfectly legitimate concerns” and admitted that Peña-Mora had broken promises he made to them. Coatsworth does not believe these problems are sufficient grounds for dismissing the Dean.

The article also reiterates the Times’ pressing (and inexplicable) need to exploit the racial undertones of the story, suggesting that the only reason PrezBo is keeping him around is because Peña-Mora, who hails from the Dominican Republic, would be the third high-profile minority administrator to step down this year.

When Dr. Peña-Mora was hired, it was the third time in quick succession that the university had filled a high-ranking post with the first minority member to hold that job. That fact drew considerable attention, especially in light of Mr. Bollinger’s national reputation as an advocate of ethnic diversity and affirmative action.

The first two of those appointees, both African-Americans, have left in the last six months: Claude M. Steele, who was provost, departed in June to become dean of Stanford University’s School of Education, and Michele M. Moody-Adams, the dean of Columbia College, quit her administrative post in frustration as school began but remains on the faculty. Some professors speculate that Mr. Bollinger is standing by Dr. Peña-Mora in part out of fear of criticism from minority communities.

Coatsworth dismissed such claims as insulting to those involved, and Peña-Mora declined to comment on the issue.

Click to show comments

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous replace pena-mora in the spring/summer ’12 (after bloomberg makes the announcement on the funding for the new engineering campus)

  • Boli says:

    @Boli Here is why I think the hiring of Pena-Mora is a racial issue:

    Pena-Mora was hired during the take-over of Harlem land for building the future Manhattanville campus. Having a Hispanic Dean was seen by the Trustees and/or the President as an advantage for the negotiations with the black and hispanic communities of Harlem.

    Ask people who were in the Dean search committee. Pena-Mora had an academic record way inferior to the other two candidates that were short-listed to Bollinger by the committee. Ultimately, Bollinger hired him for that one single reason: Pena-Mora would facilitate the take-over of Harlem land.

    Think about it, Bollinger is a lawyer. He was not hired by the trustees for his scholarship nor for his ability to lead a top university. He was hired as a lawyer able to facilitate the Harlem expansion, the last chance of Columbia to expand in Manhattan. In turn, Bollinger hired a hispanic dean to facilitate the Manhattanville project. That’s why Bollinger is still standing with Pena-Mora, whatever the urgency is to remove that incompetent and arrogant man. How long? How long?

    1. alum says:

      @alum who were the other two candidates?

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous navratil. open secret

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous You are seriously entitled.. unless you’re employment future is assured or you have a limitless trust fund, you’re in for a rude awakening once you leave these hallowed grounds behind… speaking of rude… rude or not, I’d do Jenny Mak.. I think she’s incredibly sexy…

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Why Spectator fell behind New York Times?
    How could Spectator not knowing anything for more than two years?
    Was spectator trying to protect some one?

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous “The article also reiterates the Times’ pressing (and inexplicable) need to exploit the racial undertones of the story”

    Wow. Either you don’t realize that this is a race issue because bwog is full of white people blind to their own racism (and/or people of color complicit in it, and still blind), or this quote is sarcastic.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous how is this a race issue? steele left because he wanted to be closer to his family, moody-adams resigned because of policy differences and fenioksy’s uproar is because of his heavy top-down management style. so how is this a race issue? it seems to me you are the one who is blind here. there are real race issues worth debating about, please don’t sully the cause with such baseless insinuations.

      person of color

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Do you really think a high profile administrator would come right out and say it’s a race issue, even if it was? They have their own reputations to think about plus the reputations of the institutions at which they may remain. Especially since – as this bwog post has shown – anyone who brings up even legitimate concerns about racial policies is seen as a whiner who is playing the “race card.”

        Plus, their personal reasons for leaving may have nothing to do with race, but that doesn’t mean that a string of minority administrators leaving the campus doesn’t have racial implications – especially for the students of color on campus.

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Dude, it’s totally a race issue bro. (takes huge rip of acrylic bong, exhales slowly filling the air with a the sensuous aroma of marijuana)

      Like, they’re all not white…(cough cough)….why can’t we learn to love.

      Your friendly neighborhood ad hominem

  • SEAS says:

    @SEAS I’m really glad that this article came out. I’ve felt this way for some time now but I thought it was only me so I never dared to say anything.

  • Mutiny says:

    @Mutiny on the SEAS!

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous OCCUPY LOW

  • i think says:

    @i think All those SEAS guys currently taking time off school for start ups and work should cough up some dough and donate to the school.

    maybe this time we can actually afford a better dean.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous No, they should keep their money far the hell away from Columbia. Donations at Columbia go to:

      1) Pay inflated salaries.
      2) Build expensive buildings with Italian marble.
      3) Pay salaries for professors
      4) Go to emergency fund called “Financial Aid”. Access by raising tuition across the board. Give more “aid” to pay 1, 2, and 3.

      So no. Don’t ever give to Columbia, because it’s already so bloated. You don’t break a coke habit by giving someone enough coke that they can sell it and pay for treatment. No it’ll just be blown. Dumbass.

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous I only know one guy taking off school for a startup. He’s a boss and is most likely going to be val when he comes back. I feel bad for the guy who was (previously) the top contender for SEAS 2014 val.

      1. lolz says:

        @lolz i know at least 6.

        all of them were class of 2010, now to be class of 2012/2013 i think

  • SEAS '11 says:

    @SEAS '11 Dean troubles, SEAS name change, and now Amy the HamDel Lady is gone?!? This school went to shit the minute I left.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous There was no SEAS name change. Student Affairs was/is just being stupid.

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Student Affairs was doing what they were told to do irt calling it Columbia Engineering.

  • hmmm says:

    @hmmm bwog is there a waiting period for comments…why won’t my comment show up”

  • an idea says:

    @an idea Comparison of Degrees bestowed by department in 2011:

    Mechanical Engineering: 38
    Electrical Engineering: 25
    Financial Engineering/Operations Research/Industrial Engineering: 81

    “Whereas in other universities the department of operations research resides in the business school, Columbia’s department of operations research is part of the engineering school…(it) provides its students with a launch pad to lucrative jobs in Wall Street, finance, government, and industry…Graduates from this program often assume positions as business analysts, financial analysts, managers of hedge funds and banks, and executives in investment banks, insurance firms, and other financial firms.”

    In my opinion, the growing importance of IEOR/Financial Engineering/Wall Street Trainee Program in terms of resource and intellectual allocation is a disgrace to the integrity of SEAS and engineering as a whole. I know many at our school are unhappy with the prominence this department has taken.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Good point. That’s probably because a lot of engineers don’t actually want to study engineering but can’t transfer to the College without going through the full transfer process. In that case, why not fill applications out to all other schools.

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous i dunno, instead of maybe filling out ‘applications to other schools’, maybe columbia should fix this? its kinda ridiculous, having such a barrier in place when engineering as a major is known to have a 40% attrition rate. its a disservice to these students who made a commitment to come here and join our community to have them study something they aren’t interested in.

      2. THIS says:

        @THIS I was getting ready to write this. The whole transfer process is BS – and I’m not talking about degrees.

  • IEOR says:


    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous agreed she’s a pretty rude bitch

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous yeah, huge bitch.

      2. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous I’d do her.. I think she’s mad cute.. i wonder if she’s married or has a bf.. but yeah.. she can be bitchy.

    2. WATCHER says:

      @WATCHER Do you realize how hard Jenny Mak works for your program? She is one of the “good” mid level administrators, making sure your ass graduates and unclogging the maze of crap related red tape for students.

      Sure, replace her with someone who goes home at 5 p.m. and doesn’t give a shit about the students.

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous i don’t care how ‘hard’ she works. she needs to tone it down a little when dealing with students, be a little more respectful
        and understanding.

        1. ha says:

          @ha Looking forward to seeing you out in the real world.

          1. Anonymous says:

            @Anonymous the point is that columbia is not the real world. fyi i’m an alum

        2. Anonymous says:

          @Anonymous Respect goes both ways; I’m sure people calling her a “bitch” on BWOG demonstrates the utmost respect.

  • A fundraising school? says:

    @A fundraising school? Man, I don’t know how Columbia gets by on the 8 Billion Dollar Endowment.


    Must be a real struggle to make ends meet.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Makes it all the scarier how they’re still cutting departments and resources left and right according to what will create further profit, right?

  • anonChemEPhD says:

    @anonChemEPhD Sadly many of the TA’s this year in ChemE are not fluent speakers of English …

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Why is that sad? Often these are students who immigrate or study here to make a better life for themselves and are required to TA by their department’s rules. They are probably having a far more difficult time than you.

  • ... says:

    @... this is merely one of the first of a long line of conflicts that will arise as extrordinary manhattanville costs (and overruns) squeeze the university financially in unprecedented ways. combine that with the health of the local and national economies and you have a recipe for a perfect storm. this business with the faculty benefits pool, pena-mora increasing grad student enrollment and whatever else all come from one thing and one thing only: expenses need to go down and revenues need to go up because money is going to be extremely tight around here and the university administration knows it.

    gotta be honest… unless somehow my perspective changes drastically once i’m out of here (which is unlikely, thanks to debt loads), i won’t be shedding any tears.

  • Lumpy Space Princess says:

    @Lumpy Space Princess Oh my glob you guys. Drama bomb.

    1. wait says:

      @wait I love you.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous what is seas

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous A place with lots of water.

  • JJ says:

    @JJ Ayyy Bwog it wouldn’t kill you to write one of these stories once in a while, would it? Why do we have to hear about our problems from the Times?

    1. Yeah bwog says:

      @Yeah bwog Obviously professors who think it’s necessary to anonymously criticize their boss would much rather speak to a blog run by college kids than an internationally-recognized newspaper with one of the best reputations for reporting in the world. So why aren’t you getting these scoops?

      1. really? says:

        @really? realistically, if you’re faculty and you want change to happen, (call for the dean to resign, for example) would you go to an isolated, little-known college blog or to an internationally-recognized newspaper? getting on the times has caused this story to be severely scrutinized across the country. i think this widespread negative media coverage alone can be a cause for the dean to resign

        1. sarcasm, motherfucker says:

          @sarcasm, motherfucker do you speak it?

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous the times is correct in bringing up the issue of race; the fact that two of the first minorty administrators at columbia have left this year, and that a third seems to be heading that directions, is strange. if columbia is serious about advocating ethnic diversity, then having major figure heads of the university be of minority groups is not enough. the university has to do more to address the lack of minorities (women, LGBTQ, and racial) leading the university, not just from the top, but also in the faculty and smaller administrative positions. having another dean resign after Moody-Adams and Steel makes it appear as though minorities in prominent positions are unwelcome at columbia. while bwog might want to ignore the race issue, the fact is that the same dissatisfaction and frustration has not been reflected in leadership positions headed by whites. lots of shit is wrong with this place, and i think it’s reflected in these decisions.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Or maybe they are just doing a shitty job/tired of working in this position/got a better offer? Plenty of other reasons for quitting/being asked to quit besides race. Quit playing the race card.

      1. not anonymous says:

        @not anonymous “Quit playing the race card”

        white people, sigh.

      2. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Of course there are other reasons, but when you notice a pattern like this – it makes you wonder. And the ‘race card,’ seriously?

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous I don’t care what they are as long as they do a good job. Maybe we should focus on that instead?

    3. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Where, in this lengthy article about the fact that Feni is resisting calls to resign, did you read that he is “heading” towards resignation?

      It makes me incredibly angry that every single article the Times has written about Alma Mater’s bureaucratic musical chairs has ended with a paragraph along the lines of “Nobody in connection with this article has said that this has anything to do with race. Both the university and the administrator in question expressed shock and revulsion at our reporter’s insinuation that the great defender of affirmative action is driving people of color away from the Columbia. BUT HEY GUYS, LOOK AT ALL THE MINORITIES!”

    4. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous OR maybe this is what happens when you put race first and capability second…

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Don’t be an ass…

      2. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous I agree. There are very few minorities in higher education. Let’s say those minorities that exist are equally spread out in capability as their caucasian peers. If PrezBo aims for racial diversity then he has to be willing to accept a poor fit given that he cannot hire only the top %1 of minority candidates for reasons of salary, prior employment, etc. etc. There just wouldn’t be enough people.

        So yea, I’m willing to buy the argument that Columbia took less qualified candidates because they were minorities.

        1. sad black kid says:

          @sad black kid oh my god you guys are right! where would i be without my better-performing white peers to make sure i learn everything i have to. boy i sure am grateful.

          jk jk fuck you for thinking i didn’t earn my place here.

          1. Anonymous says:

            @Anonymous lol, well said. how come none of the incompetent white people we have as administrators are quitting? oh, that’s right, they’re obviously compentent cuz they’re white and they have more access, duh.

        2. Anonymous says:

          @Anonymous omg, are people still making these arguments in 2011? I don’t think you understand how diversity recruiting works. It means making more aggressive efforts to find qualified candidates with diverse backgrounds, not hiring any old warm body that happens to have brown skin. If that were the case, Columbia’s ethnic minority reputation of faculty and deans on campus would match population levels – or even just the levels of ethnic minority students getting PhDs and becoming eligible for faculty and administrative positions. But we all know THAT isn’t true.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Time for a new dean and English speaking TA’s

  • chemical engineering says:

    @chemical engineering in that none of the TA’s can speak english

    1. computer science says:

      @computer science you obviously haven’t met our TA’s.

      they are all very fluent… chinese or hindi.

      1. chemical engineering says:

        @chemical engineering but at least you can get jobs after you graduate.

      2. English-native CS TA says:

        @English-native CS TA THERE ARE DOZENS OF US

    2. alum says:

      @alum Some of the SEAS departments should consider having undergrads as TAs… many other schools (and other departments at Columbia) do this. Most grad students hate TAing or see it as a chore, whereas undergrads who sign up (and are then chosen) to TA actually want to be there and teach/help underclassmen. If nothing else, since they’ve already taken that same class at CU, they’d better know how to assist, or at least communicate with, current students. Just a thought.

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous so true

      2. brilliant idea says:

        @brilliant idea unfortunately for us, the columbia engineering administration (can’t speak for other schools) is super conservative and set in their ways. change is like herpes to these people. the idea of undergrads teaching other undergrads would horrify them

      3. totally says:

        @totally AGREE

      4. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous This depends on the course/department.

        I’m an undergrad, and I work as a lab assistant (grade lab reports instead of homeworks). Ialso know seniors in CS and CE can work as TAs.

      5. And says:

        @And Electrical Eng.
        Actually whole electrical engineering labs are run by Undergraduate TA/LAs

      6. agree says:

        @agree I’m a junior and I’m a TA, and all of my fellow TAs are undergrads

      7. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous “Most” graduate students don’t hate TAing. Some of us do, and some of us don’t. Most of us came to get PhDs because we wanted to be professors, which involves teaching, and so we take the TAing as experience towards that.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous This is a problem all across the university: top-heavy administration going against the interests of faculty and students in favor of financial gain. I’ve seen it happen in my department, and to become aware that it’s not an isolated issue is fucking scary.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous What does this mean? What is financial gain in the context you mention? To provide for graduate fellowships? To provide better research facilities? To provide more generous financial aid for undergraduates?

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Nope. Six-figure+ salaries and perks for administrators, investments, etc. Columbia is increasingly being run like a corporation. “Graduate fellowships”? Those are shrinking in many departments. “Better research facilities”? Yeah, but only for certain disciplines that are easily put to the service of the interests of power, and only at the expense of our neighbors up in Manhattanville. “More generous financial aid for undergraduates”? Myself and everyone I know has experienced a decreasing financial aid package over the years, and with no change in familial financial situations.

        1. Anonymous says:

          @Anonymous Trust me, Columbia is not being run like a corporation. Corporations care about their customers and realize the power of word of mouth and reputation. Columbia is being run like the government, not giving two shits about its constituents and looking only at short-term goals without long-term consequences. A bank comparison is fine as well.

          However, even a bank wouldn’t fuck over the revenue generators in their firm. Professors, education, as well as the people draw students to Columbia. All 3 are intimately intertwined, but Columbia looks like it as X + Y + Z, rather than (X|Y,Z) + (Y|X,Z) + (Z|X,Y).

      2. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Graduate fellowships?

        Financial aid for graduate students who aren’t PhD seeking is non-existant in engineering.

  • where are we going says:

    @where are we going Columbia has become a fundraising institution above all. Above the core, above education, above faculty, and most importantly above the students. We have to promote academic pursuits beyond those that bring money and stop looking at dollar signs in everything that gets done. Once you stop caring about the people in the institution then no money in the world can cover up the unsatisfactory conditions that some of the departments at this school are being kept in. Leadership is about leading by example and looking for the best results, but if this money hungry environment continues then how can we expect to provide generous financial aid packages and promote education around the world. In keeping with the values of the school, there has to be greater transparency in the upper levels of administration and there has to be honesty in the goals that are set forth.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous it won’t let me like this, but EXACTLY, THANK YOU.

      1. Lee Bollinger says:

        @Lee Bollinger I have disabled comments on this post pending the implementation of a Barnard-style lockdown on campus.

        1. Lee Bollinger says:

          @Lee Bollinger If there was an edit button, I would remind you that this was decided unilaterally, of course.

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous But who pays for generous financial aid and the resources students enjoy without fundraising?

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous If you think that all of the funds being raised are going towards education, you’re deluded. For example, it strikes me as fucked up that mid- and high-level administrators — of which there is a terrifying number — are making six digits a year and up, while my wonderful life-changing professor who happens to be an adjunct is making less than 20k.

        1. Anonymous says:

          @Anonymous But who will pay for the poster campaigns that tell us which Halloween costumes aren’t multicultural?

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous The letter mentions that a SEAS department abused TA policies or something like that. Any SEAS kids care to elaborate?

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous There was some shuffling of TA funding in some departments. I’m not certain on the details, though.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Glad to see people finally starting to talk about these issues in public, but shame on the Times for the endless race-baiting.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous It’s not “race-baiting”. When two prominent administrators of color leave within a few months of each other, and a third starts having internal problems, people legitimately start asking questions. The fact that they are all the first in their roles makes it even more poignant. Maybe Columbia needs to do more thinking about that.

    1. This says:

      @This coming from the school without an actual dean right now

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous judging by this shit, we’re better off for it.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous did you know they have a poster of dean peña mora in the engineering frat?

    1. senior says:

      @senior there is no engineering frat (recognized by columbia)

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous perhaps he/she is referring to tau beta pi, which is a national engineering honors society

        1. engineer says:

          @engineer TBP has no building. He/She probably means the engineering suite in wallach

          1. Anonymous says:

            @Anonymous every suite in wallach is an engineering suite.

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Engineering Frat?

      You mean Peña-Mora’s Army?

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous favorite? Please?

    3. seas '12 says:

      @seas '12 while wouldn’t put a poster of him up and i can’t comment on faculty relations, i personally like the guy. i feel bad for him.

  • Ad

    Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    Is Barnard ever going to build a gym or pool or work out rooms, or only continue to depend totally (read more)
    New Health And Wellness Center To Open At Barnard
    October 24, 2020
    If Your Childhood Favs Went To Columbia
    October 24, 2020
    Too much passive voice in this piece. (read more)
    An Announcement From Bwog’s Board
    October 23, 2020
    Yes I feel like there always is (read more)
    An Announcement From Bwog’s Board
    October 23, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel
    • COVID-19 misinformation