Connect with us

All Articles

USenate: A Refresher

Some University Senate members looking intrigued

Some University Senate members looking intrigued

With all this talk of USenate elections, Bwog’s been fielding the same question: so what exactly is the University Senate…? To that, Bwog groans and rolls our eyes: we’ve gone over this already!! To that end, we’re reposting an interview from last month with Jared Odessky, CC’15, about the Senate, just in time for you to cram for the midterm election.

Bwog: Can you tell me a little bit about the Senate as a body–what it is, how it’s structured?

Jared Odessky: Sure, and while doing that I’ll also explain how it’s separate from the student councils. The University Senate is a university-wide body that consists of students, faculty members, researchers, and administrators who work together to pass university-wide policy. While each school, for the most part, has its own council which deals with internal issues and works directly with the deans and student affairs administrators for those schools, the University Senate can only take on an issue if it affects more than one school and if it’s outside of the realm of the trustees. So issues that relate to labor, issues that relate to politics, issues that for the most part relate to general budgeting don’t fall within the Senate sphere, because that’s things the trustees deal with, and any issues that go under an individual school’s jurisdiction are not University Senate policy.

Bwog: What kind of issues does that leave? What’s a typical docket of Senate issues?

JO: Major issues that have been dominating over the past several years include the smoking ban, which has been under external relations as one issue that affects, obviously, multiple schools on the Morningside campus. Another example would be TAs; that affects both undergraduates who deal with TAs as well as graduate students that serve as TAs. Anything having to do with technology [and] the libraries, which are two areas that I’d like to focus on this year too.

Another U Senate meeting

Another U Senate meeting

Bwog: Can you tell me about the history of the Senate? Why does it exist? How long as it existed?

JO: The Senate was created on May 13th, 1969. Basically, after the 1968 riots, many, especially Columbia College, undergraduates saw the administration as this top-down institution that was imposing ideas and policies without any real outlet for input, both among students and faculty. So especially CC students and faculty came together in the ‘68 riots to push back against the adminstration. As a result, the University Senate was created by the trustees as an outlet to deal with those issues so that whenever there was hostility boiling up again, the University Senate could be the place where those issues could be debated and figured out.

Bwog: As an individual University Senator in this huge body, what’s your role?

JO: It’s certainly more difficult for a student senator, because we’re vastly outnumbered by faculty. The faculty number is in the 60s, the student number is in the 20s. Each student senator sits on the student affairs committee, which is where students from all the different schools work together to try to represent the student voice as a whole. That’s where the quality of life survey has been coming from, developing that feedback and presenting it to faculty and administrators and researchers. But for the most part, it’s a lot of coalition building and working with faculty and researchers and the administration to figure out what issues we can work together on.

Bwog: What are some of your individual goals for your tenure as a University Senator?

JO: One of the biggest issues that’s been emerging is space. The Senate, while not directly overseeing the expansion in Manhattanville, has a campus planning committee where we’re able to discuss with the trustees and the administration’s ears open what we would like to see happen to the vacated Morningside space as more of the graduate schools move to Manhattanville. So we’ve been working on the Morningside student space initiative, and I think collecting that data and showing the administration will really help in securing spaces that undergraduate students and our many graduate students need. I would also like to see technology tackled. I’d like to do a full technology report to assess where we stand in terms of technology compared to peer institutions as well as satisfaction regarding technology on campus. Some of that data we already have from the quality of life survey. But I think that working toward having an advisory board to CUIT would be awesome, especially because innovation, I think, is something CUIT’s been lacking in, and I think students have a lot of great ideas for how to innovate technology on campus. And I think that getting that input to CUIT directly would be a really great way to make sure that things are working properly.

Bwog: Anything else you’d like Bwog readers to know about the University Senate?

JO: The Senate only meets once a month, which I think is very different. It doesn’t react to headlines, is kind of the philosophy. Whereas the student councils react directly to maybe something in Bwog or Spec and see things that they should deal with immediately, the Senate counts itself as a deliberative body which is supposed to not react to direct news, but get a feel for the pulse on campus over long periods of time and deal with long-term issues. And the Senate is chaired by PrezBo.

Photos via Columbia’s University Senate

Click to show comments

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • anon says:

    @anon Jho is the best.

  • It's Britney Bitch says:

    @It's Britney Bitch Kenny Durrell, the CC Senate legend lives. Hail Kenny!!!!

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous q for conor skelding: isn’t it a conflict of interest that you’re a bwog editor and running for senate, and would you resign from bwog if you were elected senator

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Seen above: Someone who doesn’t know what a conflict of interest is or how to click on an About page.

      1. Seriously? says:

        @Seriously? See above: The actual person who doesn’t know what a conflict of interest is.

        If you’re going to be a reporter or edit other reporters, you shouldn’t be in a political position. Journalism Ethics 101.

        Secondly, I checked the about page. It says Conor is an editor-at-large. What about the first commenter makes you think he/she didn’t check the about page?

        1. Anonymous says:

          @Anonymous Yeah, for the Blue and White, which is different from Bwog.

          1. Somebody didn't read closely says:

            @Somebody didn't read closely Check that same page again. Check more closely.

            Conor’s listed as EIC of Blue and White, near the bottom of that page. But in the top part of the page, he’s also listed as Editor-at-Large of Bwog.

  • Ad

    Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    I need to know what kind of bread you have. Please. (read more)
    Dress Up As Alma (And Other Statues) For Halloween
    October 29, 2020
    That’s wifey right there (read more)
    Dress Up As Alma (And Other Statues) For Halloween
    October 29, 2020
    funny, can write, AND can model? a triple threat (read more)
    Dress Up As Alma (And Other Statues) For Halloween
    October 29, 2020
    omg! this is such a great article! (read more)
    Dress Up As Alma (And Other Statues) For Halloween
    October 29, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel
    • COVID-19 misinformation