That Which Shall Not Be Named is Really Asking to Be Named
Written by Bwog Staff
So everyone and their mother has seen the front page of the New York Times. Our very own f-word team has lost its way to infamy and now Bwog has to do some tricky grammatical gymnastics to report on it.* Sigh.
*Just to be clear, this is not a post about That Which Shall Not Be Named. It as a post about the New York Times article on That Which Shall Not Be Named.
Here’s a little Sparknotes:
- Article is written by a Columbia rowing alum
- Talks about how Columbia f-word has been pretty awful on and off for several decades
- Describes morning practices in strangely romantic language
- Makes wild assumptions about the courses that the f-word players are taking
- Tries to convince us that the team still has hopes of winning
- Says that winning in football is not the same thing as winning in life (because football and life exist in separate spheres?)
- Comes to the grand conclusion that we don’t need to win f-word games because the players have great job prospects and that’s all that really matters (good point…what were we even doing trying to win in the first place?)
- Bonus quote from a really rich Columbia f-word alum: “There’s not one good thing about losing. There are no lessons to be learned.” True.
Really serious dog with hand placed contemplatively on an f-word via Shutterstock.