Connect with us

All Articles

Trustees Approve USenate Changes To Rules Of Conduct

Changes in store

Changes in store

The University has approved major revisions to the Rules of University Conduct for the first time since 1989. The changes are meant to focus on student journalism in Columbia, as well as freedom of expression for every member of the community (the rights to demonstrate, rally, and petition are protected).  The biggest revisions make the court process easier to navigate and establish an independent sanctioning body. See the email below for more information!

From: University Senate <>

Date: October 12, 2015 at 12:32:07 PM EDT
Subject: The Rules of University Conduct | An Announcement from the University Senate

Dear fellow members of the Columbia University community:

Today is a defining day for the Columbia community. Following a unanimous vote by the University Senate on May 1, 2015, the Trustees of the University approved changes to the University Statutes revising the Rules of University Conduct, while also stating their strong support for efforts by the Senate and President Bollinger to protect the rights of student journalists in covering protest activity. The history of the Rules of University Conduct dates back to the Columbia University protests of 1968, following a referendum from the Columbia University Senate and the creation of the Rules of University Conduct Committee. Since 1989, there have been no major changes to the Rules, until now. The revised Rules strengthen the right of freedom of expression for every member of the University and our ability to openly demonstrate, rally, picket, and circulate petitions, while still protecting the rights of others and allowing the University to continue to function normally.

The revised Rules highlight Columbia’s commitment to freedom of speech through an affirmative statement of rights. The new procedures provide greater clarity, choice, and predictability. The most significant revisions to the Rules are changes that (a) streamline the adjudicatory procedure, (b) separate charging from sanctioning, and (c) establish an independent University Judicial Board as the sanctioning body. Together these revisions will result in a process that is more transparent, consistent in application, and uniform.

Under the leadership of Christopher Riano, the Senate Rules Committee undertook an arduous review process, examining our history and that of our peer institutions, holding three town hall meetings, and consulting with numerous student groups, administrators, and alumni to ensure that input from our diverse community was heard. On behalf of the University Senate, I thank every member of the Columbia community who engaged with the Committee during the process of review and revision. I would also like to thank the members of the Rules Committee and in particular Senators Zila Acosta, Angela Nelson, and Jared Odessky for their contributions.

With Trustee approval and their commitment to the rights of student journalists, the Rules Committee will now resume its work, with a focus on the creation of guidelines for implementation. Through the process governing the implementation of the revised Rules, the Rules Committee will continue to engage with the Columbia community, consider diverse experiences across peer institutions, and strive to adopt best practices, reinforcing our pledge to freedom of expression.

To learn more, we encourage you to review the Rules of University Conduct. To get involved in Columbia’s enterprise of shared governance, please contact the University Senate Office.


Sharyn O’Halloran
Chair, University Senate
The University Senate is a University-wide legislature, representing all constituencies, including faculty, students, administration, researchers, librarians, administrative staff, and alumni. It makes policy on a range of issues that affect the entire University or more than one school.


Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • alumnus says:

    @alumnus Over time, many of you will come to learn that Columbia sucks, but that most other places in the world suck a lot more.

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Popular This Week

    Sorry. No data so far.

    Recent Comments

    Ah, yes. Cornell University. Ah, yes yes. Such wonderful trees. You have done it again, BOGW. (read more)
    How To Relive Columbia Arbor Day At Home
    May 27, 2020
    Thanks for writing this! Definitely enjoyed the easy reading part and loved the art! (read more)
    Bwog Book Club: W.I.T.C.H. (The Graphic Novel Series)
    May 23, 2020
    TRULY GREAT TIPS BWOG 🦁❤️🦁❤️🎈 (read more)
    Open Letter To Our Professors: Zoom Do’s And Don’ts
    May 22, 2020
    I thought she was a great CC prof. (read more)
    Happy Grad Students: Part One in a One Part Series
    May 20, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel