Connect with us

All Articles

Prime Minister Of Malaysia Speaks At World Leaders Forum Amid Controversy

Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, Prime Minister of Malaysia,  joined Columbia’s World Leaders Forum to speak on multilateralism and rule of law. The University received criticism from pro-Israel groups on campus for this invitation of Prime Minister Mohamed, who has long been accused of holding and expressing anti-Semitic views, which became one of the hot topics during the question and answer session. Staff Writer Aditi Misra brings you the highlights.

Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, 93, came out of retirement last year to lead Malaysia’s first party change since 1957. Introduced by Vishakha Desai, Senior Advisor for Global Affairs and Senior Research Scholar, she explained his recent efforts to push Malaysia and other East Asian countries forward to promote their growth. After mentioning the controversy of Prime Minister Mohamed’s presence on campus due to his alleged anti-Semitism, including the expression of controversial comments last year, Desi quoted President Bollinger’s statement released the same morning – “This form of open engagement can sometimes be difficult, even painful. But to abandon this activity would be to limit severely our capacity to understand and confront the world as it is, which is a central and utterly serious mission for any academic institution.”

The rest of the conversation was moderated by Lien-Hang Nguyen, Dorothy Burg Associate Professor in the History of the United States and East Asia. On the subject of rule of law, Prime Minister Mohamad listed his priorities for his time in office as including “abolishing the draconian laws of the past government” and “restoring good governance.”

Nguyen moved the discussion to how the Malaysian vision of multilateralism has evolved over time. Prime Minister Mohamad explained that when the country became independent, it was expected that the indigenous Malaysian population would do what they can to retain their majority. He defined the concept of multilateralism through their decision to instead share with the Chinese and Indian populations in a democratic way.

A recurring theme in the talk was the need for further development in Malaysia and other southeast Asian countries, as he openly described his country as “weak.” When asked about the present challenges they face as a nation, the prime minister responded,  “The strong will take what they will and the weak will yield what they must.” He expanded on this point by emphasizing their non-militarization aim and focus on relationships in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).

During the question and answer portion of the session, the first question from the audience was on actions that could be taken to help the Rohingya refugee crisis. Prime Minister Mohamad responded with criticism, saying, “There is a very clear weakness in the United Nations in that when it sees a government being very brutal to its people, we can do nothing. We can preach and pray, but we cannot help because we do not invade countries.” Another student asked about his efforts to minimize racial tensions within Malaysia. He explained his policy initiative by comparing it to affirmative action in the United States and described its criticism – the poor citizens are in need of training and education to gain access to greater opportunities, while the rich feel as though they are being discriminated against.

Later, a representative of the pro-Israel campus group, Students Supporting Israel, spoke up against his anti-Semitic statements and asked for a clarification on his stance on the Holocaust. Prime Minister Mohamad replied, mentioning “nasty things [said] about me and about Malaysia.” Furthermore, he continued by echoing President Bollinger’s earlier statements regarding free speech, arguing that, “When you say, ‘No, you cannot be anti-Semitic,’ then there is no more free speech.”

On his dispute over the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust, he asked, “Who determines these numbers?” The Malaysian leader continued by explaining that he was around during the war and she was not, to which she responded that her grandmother was in the Holocaust.

The final topics ranged from ASEAN to Kashmir, where his answers reiterated his aforementioned belief that the UN can take no real action. He concluded the discussion by explaining that the only solution to crises like that in Kashmir is persuading member nations to adhere to the UN’s resolutions.

Image via Bwog Staff

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Paul Kurlansky, MD says:

    @Paul Kurlansky, MD “He defined the concept of multilateralism through their decision to instead share with the Chinese and Indian populations in a democratic way.” Is this why the Chinese and Indian populations in Malaysia are treated as second class citizens, discriminated against and send their children abroad for education–and why those children elect not to return to the two class system.
    Those who lie about the Jews, lie about other things as well

  • Ari Hirsch says:

    @Ari Hirsch Bwog is fucking disgusting. Painting Mohamad as having “received criticism from pro-Israel groups” paints this as a political issue surrounding Israel. But Mohamad’s views on Israel have nothing to do with the issue at hand. Mohamad is an anti semite through and through who has advocated for the destruction of the Jewish people. And just the fact that you guys have to mention the fact that the person who questioned him on his anti-semitic views is “a representative of the pro-Israel campus group” shows the gross extent to which you have politicized this issue. Mohamad has described Jews as “hook-nosed,” has claimed the Jews “rule the world by proxy,” has openly questioned and denied the holocaust, going so far to BAN Schindler’s list in Malaysia. He has literally claimed that he is “proud to be labeled anti semitic.” “Alleged anti-Semitism.” What a fucking joke. Bwog should be ashamed of themselves.

    I respect campus policy which allowed him to speak here. That is not what I am criticizing. I am just disgusted with Bwog’s reporting on the event.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Israel has to start allowing people to criticize their government, especially Americans, without being name called. Criticizing Netanyahu and Israel is not being antisemitic , the same way criticizing Trump and his policies is not being anti American. There is a huge difference. If Israel were a true democracy, it would be open and accepting of criticism.

      1. K says:

        @K Dude how fucking stupid can this response be. The guy is talking about anti semitism, the hate towards Jews and your response is related to Israeli policies. Your comment shows you have no understanding of the struggles related to Jewish identities and probably no understanding on the distinction of being a Jew and being an Israeli government official

      2. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Hey NPC tell us which Vox article your plagiarized to put together your irrelevant screed.

  • Vikram says:

    @Vikram Just FYI, the title should read “amid controversy,” not “among.”

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    Discrete math is like baby's first college math class, chill out brother (read more)
    A Bwogger’s Guide To Good First-Year Classes: Fall 2020 Edition
    August 4, 2020
    Thank you for sharing your info. I really appreciate your efforts and I am waiting for your next post thank (read more)
    Email From Columbia Admin Requests That Graduate Students And Faculty Reconsider Teaching Solely Online, Gives Three Days To Decide
    August 4, 2020
    Hi! That's totally fair. We don't condone excess socializing during the pandemic. However, we wrote this based on general freshman (read more)
    Things We Wish We Knew Our First-Year
    August 4, 2020
    It's laughable that there are already "scientific" papers on "long term covid 19 effects" where "long term" means a couple (read more)
    Everything We Know About Columbia’s Reopening Plan (As Of 7/28/2020)
    August 3, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel
    • COVID-19 misinformation