Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

Smoking Should Be Only Sort of Banned

As we speak the Tobacco Working Group, a committee of students, faculty and administrators, is presenting their recommendations and very long report [PDF] to CCSC. Briefly, the group recommends that the university establish (and actually enforce) a “consistent distance rule” delineating a radius around Morningside campus buildings where you can’t smoke. Details to come!

Update 9:52 PM: According to Class of 2011 President Sean Udell, the report will now go to “what’s the Christian name for a waiting room?” The report states that the Tobacco Working Group will submit its recommendations to Vice President Scott Wright, although it is unclear what action will be taken next and by whom.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

23 Comments

  • relevent says:

    @relevent yes please.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous The 20 foot rule right now seems consistent, it’s just not enforced.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous How are they going to enforce this? Issue fines?

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous would it kill someone to put up signs?

    oh right, the non-smokers.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous This is stupid. If it is anywhere outside, then it isn’t a bother. This is unless the smoke is flowing into the building to any noticeable extent. In this case, there will always be a security guard on duty that should be in charge of telling people to move the fuck away.

    to be consistent, we should ban fatties indoors and within 20 feet of a door.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous How is this stupid? I for one hate walking behind a person who’s smoking only and having to breathe in secondhand smoke. I have no issue with them destroying their own lungs, but I’d like to leave my own lungs intact.

      As for fat people, how are they relevant to this?

      1. relevent says:

        @relevent thank you.

        also, people shouldn’t have to go out of their way to avoid the smokers in front of butler because they don’t want to inhale secondhand smoke.

      2. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous *who’s smoking and having to

      3. LOL not fat PEOPLE, silly! says:

        @LOL not fat PEOPLE, silly! fatty: a large, nicely packed joint.

    2. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Also, how is this stupid? For those of us that have life-threatening asthma and start wheezing in the presence of secondhand smoke, the smoking ban is not stupid.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous I think its called purgatory

  • smoking says:

    @smoking is funny

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Maybe I won’t have to walk through a noxious cloud of second-hand smoke in front of Butler *fingers crossed*

  • non smoker says:

    @non smoker smoke outside of butler is nothing compared to smoke in front of dodge.

  • umm says:

    @umm Maybe I won’t have to walk through a noxious cloud of second-hand smoke in front of YOUR MOM *fingers crossed*

  • ... says:

    @... wow that report is kindof a disaster…

    first off, they state that their final recommendation is a “consistent distance rule” but they don’t elaborate on what exactly that is. they spend pages and pages on showing nice graphs of whether or not the community is “for” or “against” some nebulous policy, but they don’t fully define their final recommendation?

    the multi-round voting methodology is bizarre. is it irv? doesn’t look like it. looks more like airv, arbitrary instant runoff voting.

    as far as those going on about having to walk through clouds of smoke outdoors… one day, you’ll have to walk down a real city street, and on those real city streets you’ll find *gasp* people smoking. so you’re really only putting off something that is not only of miniscule importance, it’s also pretty much inevitable. now unless you wanna grow up to be like that weird barnard prof that keeps getting written up in the local media for getting bars in soho shut down, maybe this might be a good time to take things down a notch.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous I’ll agree that the report is a disaster. “Request voluntary compliance”? Meaning that compliance is optional? And absolutely no mention of coordination with public safety? (Oh, wait, they did, they kicked a can down the road — “Develop process to report violations and/or discuss concerns.”)

      How the hell will this be enforced, without some public safety guard literally standing by all the time? Do they really expect us to call in a report, wait 10 minutes for someone of authority to show up, then have that person do nothing because all the smokers are (temporarily) gone? Or do they expect us to take names? Really? Then it boils down to he said/she said, unless you have a shitload of witnesses who are actually willing to be a part of the Dean’s Discipline process. All for a cigarette ban.

      As for putting off the inevitable, that doesn’t make sense. There’s a difference between getting occasionally exposed to second-hand smoke from a city street and constantly having to navigate through the Butler smokers every night.

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Amendment: Okay, enforcement can work if we’re all encouraged to take cell phone pics of violators.
        I’m leery of that.

    2. Person says:

      @Person Why is a comment hidden by default if it has more likes than dislikes?

      1. Hans says:

        @Hans Your comment’s parent is not quite as grey as poorly-rated comments—because it has a high number of votes but the difference in up/down votes is still below a threshold.

  • coob says:

    @coob good thing the rules only apply to tobacco

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous WTF????? omg you cant ban smoking outdoors. nonsmokers- you have all the fresh air you want. nobody is forcing you to stand next to us and inhale everything we exhale

  • non-smoker says:

    @non-smoker eh…I don’t see the need for us to be like Barnard. The idea that non-smokers are inhaling a significant amount of second-hand smoke at Columbia sounds like a load of bull (we’re all breathing NYC air anyways). Just because you don’t like the smell of cigarettes does not mean smoking itself should be effectively banned. I don’t smoke, but I certainly don’t mind the smell of cigarettes. My fellow non-smokers need to quit whining about the smoke outside of Butler

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    is it too late to bully them into letting me take a gap year? :( (read more)
    Academic Calendar Updates, Pre-Orientation Programs Canceled Or Modified
    June 29, 2020
    This is great news Columbia is opening up on schedule. (read more)
    Academic Calendar Updates, Pre-Orientation Programs Canceled Or Modified
    June 25, 2020
    EXPEL ALL RACISTS FROM COLUMBIA! Tod Howard Hawks, Columbia College, Class of 1966 (read more)
    Racist Messages In FIJI GroupMe Surface, Involved Members Asked To Disaffiliate
    June 25, 2020
    It is great Columbia will be opening on time in the fall. (read more)
    Academic Calendar Updates, Pre-Orientation Programs Canceled Or Modified
    June 25, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel