Menu CATEGORIES

Connect with us

CATEGORIES Menu
All Articles

From the Issue: The Scintillating Death of Stanford White

The summer issue of The Blue & White has introduced you to Brian Greene, an underworld on fire, and Westside ninjas. Now, in the final of three Bluenotes, our field notes from campus, senior editor Claire Sabel scandalizes us with the liebestod of one of the university’s architects.

AND he had a great 'stache!

Illustration by Julia Stern

It’s material that genuinely earnest tour guides dream of: something to titillate the parents, impress the teens, and show off just how cosmopolitan—and lurid—Columbia can be. Yet somehow a particularly lecherous tidbit of campus lore has been left out of the tour guide’s standard narrative. Whilst strolling around our pleasantly right angle-ridden campus, the triumvirate McKim, Mead, and White trips off one’s tongue without knowing, or caring, much about the gentlemen themselves. If anything, students are vaguely aware of their status as relatively important Neoclassical architects. Allow us to enlighten you, because their story is really too salacious to leave by the wayside.

It just so happens that in 1906, six years after his firm’s completion of Columbia’s campus, Mr. Stanford White was shot in the head by Harry K. Thaw. Thaw was an infamous millionaire who was jealous of White’s raunchy relations with his young wife, showgirl Evelyn Nesbit. Their romantic trysts, Nesbit later testified, involved White pushing the young woman back and forth on his notorious velvet swing—in the nude. During a serendipitous performance of the number “I Could Love a Million Girls,” Harry K. Thaw assassinated the architect-playboy on the rooftop of Madison Square Garden. The building was then in its second incarnation and had been designed by White himself. Oh, the irony!

The story caused a sensation at the time due in part to the extraordinary circumstances of the crime, and the subsequent scandal of the trial; Thaw was eventually acquitted by plea of temporary insanity. It has remained a source of fascination for writers, inspiring titles such as The Architect of Desire: Beauty and Danger in the Stanford White Family and American Eve: The Birth of the “It” Girl and The Crime of the Century, which was featured in E.L. Doctorow’s novel Ragtime and exported to France in Claude Chabrol’s film The Girl Cut in Two. That White’s story should be so unfamiliar to those who tread in his footsteps every day should be rectified. Take heed, Undergraduate Recruitment Committee! It’s true stories like this one that the ingénues in your charge will remember, not the myth of Columbia’s “Urban Beach.”

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

 

2 Comments

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous no one reads these.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Yes, but Stanford White had almost nothing to do with Columbia so not really a relevant story. The campus is the work of his partner Charles McKim. The three partners of McKim, Mead and White were quite independent.

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    this is a sarah braner appreciation comment (read more)
    COMIC: Our Semester In One Image
    July 7, 2020
    is it too late to bully them into letting me take a gap year? :( (read more)
    Academic Calendar Updates, Pre-Orientation Programs Canceled Or Modified
    June 29, 2020
    This is great news Columbia is opening up on schedule. (read more)
    Academic Calendar Updates, Pre-Orientation Programs Canceled Or Modified
    June 25, 2020
    EXPEL ALL RACISTS FROM COLUMBIA! Tod Howard Hawks, Columbia College, Class of 1966 (read more)
    Racist Messages In FIJI GroupMe Surface, Involved Members Asked To Disaffiliate
    June 25, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel