Connect with us

All Articles

ESC Releases Statement Supporting Peña-Mora; We Wax Prosaic

The school year might be over as far as final exams and cat-naps in Butler go, but as we learned last summer, there’s never a dull moment for the admin.

As SEAS seniors and their Dean get ready to tear up South Lawn, their student council remind us that there’s more to the story, with a newly released statement reaffirming their confidence in Dean Peña-Mora’s “commitment to undergraduate students.” You can check out all two paragraphs after the jump, but bear with us for a few bullets if you need a recap.

The quick-and-dirty:

May 12, 2012

To the Editor:

With the academic year wrapping up and summer quickly approaching, the Engineering Student Council would like to make a statement reaffirming our confidence in Dean Peña-Mora’s commitment to undergraduate students. We believe that Dean Peña-Mora has and will continue to maintain his strong and fruitful working relationship with the undergraduate engineering community.

Since becoming the Dean three years ago, he has continuously strived to improve the undergraduate engineering experience. Through his many initiatives to reach out to the students, Dean Peña-Mora has actively maintained both visibility and accessibility to student groups and individual students.

We are confident that the Dean will further enhance the undergraduate engineering student life and educational experience. We look forward to working with the Dean next year.


Tim Qin, President

Bora Kim, VP Policy

Sheila Misheni, VP Student Life

Siddhant Bhatt, VP Finance

Caroline Taylor, VP Communications

Akshay Shah, University Senator

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous I wish ESC would get it through their thick heads, no one gives a fuck what they think about this “scandal”. This isn’t about undergrads. Its about professors.

    1. The Dark Hand says:

      @The Dark Hand >implying anyone gives a fuck what undergrads think.
      >implying the ESC aren’t just an extension of the interests of the University’s powers that be in the form of undergraduate sock puppets.

    2. Anonymous says:


    3. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Alumni do. Administrators do. And students do.

      To replace a Dean of a school involves more than simply the professors. The Dean of a school is not there to serve the professors. He or she oversees all functions of the school, which includes administration, alumni, professors, and students.

      As of right now it would seem that only the professors are against Dean Pena Mora, while he has vast amounts of support amongst the administrators, alumni, and students. Who are you to discount the opinions of students?

      1. admin? says:

        @admin? i heard the opposite about admin, at least from outside SEAS

    4. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Actually, many people do, including Prezbo.

    5. your mom says:

      @your mom cares

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous Pressurized by the Dean as he lobbied for support?
    The best possible title for him is Dean of Student Affairs.
    Think about the welfare of fellow classmates, but not your personal gain by polishing up the CV.

    1. fsda says:

      @fsda do you mean “pressured”? did feni ask studetns to write letters of support?

  • Anonymous says:


    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Did the dean actually claim the faculty is racist? If so, all the more reason for him to go. In either case, he clearly is incompetent and not suited for the job.

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous Where is New York Times? We want to see the letter signed by the politicians claiming racism at Columbia. I said “signed” because I don’t know who was the one who actually wrote the letter.
        ESC please make your stand clear about racism.

        1. signatories says:

          @signatories signatories are listed here in a story about the letter:

        2. La carta está firmada por says:

          @La carta está firmada por por el senador estatal Adriano Espaillat, el Concejal Ydanis Rodríguez, los asambleístas Guillermo Linares y Herman Denny Farrell Jr., el senador estatal Bill Perkins y el Concejal Robert Jackson

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous The engineering faculty operates like a private club that treats students as irrelevant pawns that can be milked at will. This is why they prefer foreign students, whose visas they can threaten and who willingly conspire in grant grubbing shenanigans.

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous you should name the professors or be more specific if there were such cases. no one in the US should have their freedom taken away

  • There's a difference says:

    @There's a difference Between visibility/accessibility, and actually being an active proponent of the undergraduate student body. Which is not to say that he hasn’t done ANYTHING; but which is to say that this letter from the ESC is either uninformed (acknowledging their collective experience on ESC, how long has this board been in place and working directly with PM, again?), praising the wrong virtues or blind to the real problem.

    Importantly, it seems like it would be difficult for the dean to affect much meaningful change in the realm of undergraduate education absent some clout with the tenured faculty, who in my experience are often the barrier to progress here (mainly a fear of the unknown/general resistance to change).

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous What kind of change are you looking for exactly? Your entire response seems be centered on bashing ESC and Pena Mora. ESC members and the Dean have worked on a variety of policies such as public course evaluations (passed by the Senate), new minors for SEAS students, adding more non-technical courses, improving/creating internship programs specifically for SEAS undergraduates, and much much more.

      To merely dismiss these improvements shows that you have a vendetta against ESC & the Dean, you are simply uninformed, or you are blind to the improvements that have been made.

      Supporting the Dean in undergraduate matters does not mean ignoring the faculty. This situation is not “us” vs. the Faculty and it is not a two-sided conversation. There are a range of issues and discussions. Supporting the Dean does not mean ESC members or whoever else does not want to engage the faculty.

      Please do list the “real” problems that you believe the Dean/ESC has missed. It would be enlightening to know. Are you referring to space issues or financial aid? Every school has spacing issues, but last I heard CC had to move classes to 8am in the morning due to a lack of space. I think SEAS has managed quite well. Financial aid? Dean Shollenberger just announced a committee of 8 to look at these issues. CCSC and ESC are also looking at these issues.

      As for meaningful change, the Dean has done an amazing job of turning the school around, building infrastructure for the school, raising money, and helping improve the engineering student experience.

      Please don’t diminish these accomplishments and very tangible results simply because you are ignorant of the facts.

  • no says:

    @no No, the dean has not, actually, “done an amazing job of turning the school around”. Ranking was over 30 in 2001, 20, in 2007, below 20 in 2008, and has been on a generally improving trend for almost 15 years. Thinking that the dean somehow “did” this is really blind.

  • Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    They did Barnard yesterday. But to be fair, this is a Columbia College publication as is Spectator. Most clubs (read more)
    Columbia Announces Reopening Plans For 2020-2021 Year
    July 9, 2020
    :) you're a shining star!!!!! (read more)
    Senior Wisdom: Rania Siddique
    July 8, 2020
    The other deans also sent emails, but guess y'all will just ignore those because y'all think CC is the only (read more)
    Columbia Announces Reopening Plans For 2020-2021 Year
    July 8, 2020
    did you ever get it? :( (read more)
    Fake It Till You Make It
    July 8, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel