MENU CATEGORIES

Connect with us

Submit a Tip
MENU CATEGORIES
Posts Tagged with "andrew gelman"

You may remember when we asked for your professors’ partisan opinions before the election, but now that it’s all over, we’re looking to see what they thought of the results.  Did Andrew Gelman go to sleep at 8:30 or party ’til the early morn?  Is there surprise?  Merriment?  Bleary eyes? Tell us your story by […]

Read More

With the first polls a little under a half-hour away from closing, we know that your election anxiety is mounting. Therefore, to ease your anticipation a bit, Bwog proudly brings you a roundup of its favorite election day liveblogs to keep you ahead of the game tonight as the first polls close up shop for […]

Read More

Columbia statistician/friend-of-Nate-Silver Andrew Gelman has resurfaced on everyone’s new favorite blog, FiveThirtyEight.  Gelman uses FiveThirtyEight’s data to conclude that if Obama wins Virginia and it’s a close race in Indiana — both of which are looking increasingly likely — it’s literally a statistical certainty that Obama will win the race. Additionally, this means that the […]

Read More

Have Your Say

You’ve heard of PresBo, now get ready for…

View Results

Loading ... Loading …
An advertisement for an information session on March 23 for SPS' Master's Program in Political Analytics

Recent Comments

Every year at our high school picnic, science students created fireworks by floating a paper boat with dehydrated sodium in (read more)
Science Fair: Fireworks Edition
March 20, 2023
My heavens, ageism is real. Obviously the young person writing this has the privilege of youth to not understand the (read more)
Rachel Hendrix—The Story Of A Rich, Old, White Woman Who Thinks She’s Special
March 14, 2023
Grief and loss are front and center in this film ..sensitively drawn by the actor The director has a specific (read more)
Rachel Hendrix—The Story Of A Rich, Old, White Woman Who Thinks She’s Special
March 12, 2023

Comment Policy

The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
  • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
  • Hate speech
  • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
  • Personal information about an individual
  • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
  • Spam or self-promotion
  • Copyright infringement
  • Libel
  • COVID-19 misinformation