Connect with us

All Articles

Fireside Chat: #OWS, M’Ville, & WLF

PrezBo generously shared his mansion and manservant with some lucky lottery winners at his first Fireside Chat last night from 6 to 7:30 pm. Bwog’s Conor Skelding, ever eager to enter 60 Morningside Drive, stopped by to watch his fellow students waffle between demonizing and deifying their president-for-life.

Where the magic happens.

5:57 to 6:35 pm was spent mingling around a central snack spread of pastrami finger sandwiches, artisinal cheeses, fruits, vegetables, donuts, candies, sparkling water, soda, and apple cider. KevSho made his rounds, greeting and chatting with students. There was an unusually large representation of freshpeople. By a little after 6:30, whatever force moves people in polite social situations, herded the crowd into PrezBo’s sitting room.

Once everybody had settled, PrezBo, dressed sharply in a navy suit and blue tie, entered stage right. He opened candidly: “You can ask me anything and I’ll say if I can answer it or don’t want to.” The game was afoot.

A student sporting a soul patch pitched the first question, about Columbia’s patents on intellectual property. PrezBo replied that such patents bring in $75 to $100 million a year. He’s ” happy they make money,” but modestly admitted his lack of knowledge on patent issues. Someone else followed up with a comment on the move of scientific scholarship from individual to group, from specific to holistic. PrezBo likes this trend, and wants making more buildings to house all these wonderful holistic happenings.

Next a student asked for the President’s thoughts on Occupy Wall Street. PrezBo mentioned that he’d read David Brook’s opinions and mostly agreed with them. Merely attacking easy targets like the rich or Wall Street is an oversimplification, he explained. “Wall Street firms were significantly responsible, but not the only ones [to blame].” He added that part of blame must be shouldered by the American people and regulators for being “swept up in easy money.” Though Prezbo maintains that “demonstrations are by definition oversimplifications,” he diverges from Brooks because he believes the emotions expressed in protests genuinely valuable and worth listening to.

Finger food! Silver forks!

Throughout the course of the night, PrezBo shifted from standing, to sitting on his stool, to leaning on it, to standing again. He had two small bottles of San Pellegrino and a drinking glass, but only sipped at one throughout the night, straight from the bottle.

Following the OWS discussion, a student inquired about PrezBo’s vision for Columbia and how our humble institution compares to other Ivies. He defined his job as “[creating] the conditions under which great scholarship can be done,” and identified “space” and “resources” as the biggest problems historically facing Columbia. “Anybody who has spent time at Columbia knows the significance of the word ‘gym.'” he joked. Manhattanville and NoCo were meant to alleviate those problems, and “universities must grow.” Part of that growth will come from endowments, and PrezBo noted that Columbia is performing exceptionally in terms of annual growth, but its total nest egg still lags far behind the behemoth that is Harvard’s $32 billion.

Next another guest asked what PrezBo had read lately. ‘Bo likes to revisit Shakespeare, Montaigne, and Thoreau, but recently delved into a book about Pakistan by a Washington Post journalist. “I’ve read three by Washington Post reporters lately. I get them free.” Being on the Pulitzer committee also forces him to read a lot.

In response to the question “to what do you attribute your success to over the years?” PrezBo laughed, and said basically that he believes you can improve yourself and become smarter with work. He was sure to add that “every conversation is a chance to learn.”

Then came politics. A student expressed disillusionment with politicians divorced from the “American people.” PrezBo shares those sentiments, and pondered if “maybe the whole system needs to be restructured,” and ventured “maybe we need a whole new Constitution.” Our current conception of free speech only dates from the 20th century Supreme Court rulings which culminated in a wide interpretation of the First Amendment. For more on this issue, see Bollinger’s fabulously titled book.

Next another guest brought up an evil hotel company which buys hotels, cuts staff, and runs at the same capacity. She said that this hotel company courts Ivy League schools, and wanted to know if we invested in it. He said he doesn’t know, but that the endowment office has people who take care of that.

The conversation moved on to the World Leader’s Forum. Bollinger thinks it’s awesome, as did everyone in attendance. Asked how it could be improved, the audience mainly pointed to the excruciating painful experience of using Sundial to register for any event in high demand. In light of PrezBo’s penchant for inviting controversial, occasionally reviled, leaders, to the Forum, he called for a show of hands to see who believed in brining in such figures. Save a lone dissenting hand, the attendees were firmly in favor of the invitations. Seeing a leader in person is different from watching or reading, PrezBo thinks, because it lets you see their mannerisms and how they carry themselves. This idea helped segue into Columbia’s Global Centers and how he wants to let students spend a week or two in Amman, Santiago, or Beijing.

So much win.

As the clock crept towards 7:30, we reached the inevitable token question on the Core: is it outdated? “The Core, at its core, is brilliant,” he responded, while conceding that, “I also believe it needs to be continually debated.” Then a senior in CC asked if the new special business concentration meant we were “selling out” our liberal arts cred to pre-professionalism. ‘Bo said no. He loves the Core, and wants you to learn everything! “For you to plan your lives and get started on being specialized is a waste of your life.” The Core, and our opportunities for broad study are, he says, “a great privilege, and a luxury.” Besides, you’ll be spending the rest of your life in a cubicle specializing.

PrezBo finished at 7:41 with the epic words, “Get some food!” He’s ended events with those words before, but this time he meant it. There were take out boxes! Between his wisdom and the gourmet snacks, the President had worked his magic: the same skeptics who spoke snidely of him at 6:30 seemed smitten just an hour later.  Weighed down with crudité, we headed out into the night.

Click to show comments

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.



  • Van Owen says:

    @Van Owen PrezBo is a pretentious name dropper and a dick. Don’t expect to get an honest answer out of him if the question is about money.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous In 2006, Bollinger made $700K. He now makes $1.8 million. Meanwhile, the average salaries of americans have DECLINED? Remind me again, Lee, about the people who are “swept up in easy money”… Last time I checked, you’re also on the Fed Reserve of NY. Your job to help regulate. Let me ask you something, Lee: how is it, that “we all share responsibility” but you’re making two and a half times what you did before the crash, and the average American is making less than they did? Boy am I glad this guy is running our university…

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Maybe he’s making that money because the university is growing? The endowment is doing better? Reasearch and prestige are on the upswing?

      We live in a capitalistic society…sometimes people fare differently.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous For some reason this comment really made me laugh.

  • Sigh says:

    @Sigh Fascinating that OWS is “oversimplification,” but Bo’ decides that “maybe we need a whole new Constitution.”

    1. Is that really an oversimplification? says:

      @Is that really an oversimplification? I think it was Jefferson who put forth the idea that every 19 years we should rewrite the constitution from scratch?

      The idea being that as our laws age, they start to cement, and soon you have all these laws that are simply laws for their own sake. People are used to them, so they stay. Redrafting a constitution – constantly having to go back and reevaluate what regulations are truly in the nation’s best interest – would make legislation much more malleable, I think. And isn’t that what we’re all after here? A system that’s firm enough to keep us functioning, yet flexible enough to change as our needs change?

      Of course, a change like that would be difficult to effect – but at this point, most change is. At the very least, it’s an interesting idea.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous wait isn’t he a chair of the federal reserve wait what

    1. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous Lrn2Google

  • huh? says:

    @huh? i found it to be an easy smooth read. actually admittedly, some of it is better written than the stuff i’ve written for UC Writing and have gotten B’s on.

    personal learning opportunity: what part of his/her article did you find “poor”?

    1. cringe says:

      @cringe Things were beginning to end, and he had worked his magic: the same skeptics who spoke snidely about him at 6:30 were enamored of him merely an hour later.

    2. Cringe summed it up pretty well. says:

      @Cringe summed it up pretty well. It’s not like it was hard to digest or anything – the point got across. But you had situations like Cringe’s example, where the individual words were good, but they were put together in unattractive ways. It was like Conor was reaching for this almost mythical tone (The man! the legend! the PrezBo!) but just fell short.

    3. Anonymous says:

      @Anonymous “a sharp peer”

      “a girl”?? I’m assuming that’s a Columbia student you’re referring to.

      1. Anonymous says:

        @Anonymous For some reason this comment really made me laugh

  • This post is a good example says:

    @This post is a good example of rich words used poorly.

  • Anonymous says:

    @Anonymous This is one of the most poorly written articles I have ever read.

  • Ad

    Have Your Say

    What should Bwog's new tagline be?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Recent Comments

    They said no PANTS they didn't say no SHORTS!! Joking ;) Anyways some of these seem like good ideas...o (read more)
    How To Impress Your Class Crush On Zoom
    October 21, 2020
    When is he coming to speak at Columbia? (read more)
    LNB: Lin-Manuel Miranda At Columbia
    October 20, 2020
    didn't know I needed this until now, thank you <3 (read more)
    LNB: Lin-Manuel Miranda At Columbia
    October 20, 2020
    yung nuggies you are my late night homie to bop and vibe with (read more)
    A Conversation With SoundCloud Rapper Yung Nugget
    October 19, 2020

    Comment Policy

    The purpose of Bwog’s comment section is to facilitate honest and open discussion between members of the Columbia community. We encourage commenters to take advantage of—without abusing—the opportunity to engage in anonymous critical dialogue with other community members. A comment may be moderated if it contains:
    • A slur—defined as a pejorative derogatory phrase—based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, or spiritual belief
    • Hate speech
    • Unauthorized use of a person’s identity
    • Personal information about an individual
    • Baseless personal attacks on specific individuals
    • Spam or self-promotion
    • Copyright infringement
    • Libel
    • COVID-19 misinformation